Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Clinical Intelligence

Vitamin D supplementation for women before and during pregnancy: an update of the guidelines, evidence, and role of GPs and practice nurses

Catherine Hynes, Amrita Jesurasa, Patricia Evans and Caroline Mitchell
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (662): 423-424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X692489
Catherine Hynes
NIHR academic clinical fellow GP specialty trainee;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amrita Jesurasa
School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
Roles: Public health specialty registrar and honorary clinical lecturer in public health
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patricia Evans
Page Hall Medical Centre, Sheffield.
Roles: GP partner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline Mitchell
Academic Unit of Primary Medical Care, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
Roles: Senior clinical lecturer and GP partner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

INTRODUCTION

UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance (2014) advises that 10 µg vitamin D should be taken by all women throughout pregnancy, ideally starting prior to conception.1,2 However, the terminology used and practicalities of implementing this advice can be confusing, as can the role of the GP and practice nurse regarding the provision of supplementation; — particularly as their involvement in routine antenatal care is tending to diminish. This article summarises the evidence and related guidance on managing vitamin D status in pregnant women, and provides an update on the ways in which women can obtain the necessary supplements.

BACKGROUND

Vitamin D is not only integral to calcium homeostasis and bone health, but it also has multiple other sites of action throughout the body, including the pancreas, skin, intestine, and immune system. In the UK, dietary sources of vitamin D are limited and account for only 10–20% of the total body store; natural sources include oily fish, egg yolk, and red meat, while fortified foods include infant and toddler formula milks, some breakfast cereals, and margarines. The majority of vitamin D is from skin synthesis following exposure to sunlight, although in the UK the necessary wavelength of ultraviolet radiation is only available between April and mid-October.1,3

Most laboratories measure serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) as a reflection of current vitamin D stores, which equates to the levels produced cutaneously and through diet. Serum levels of 50 nmol/L or higher of 25-hydroxyvitamin D are considered sufficient to maintain adequate bone health in the general population.1 Severe vitamin D deficiency is a serum level of <25 nmol/L 25(OH)D, and results from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey suggest that around one-fifth of adults in the UK are severely deficient.4 Risk factors particularly relevant to pregnant women include having darker skin and wearing clothing that covers most of the skin.2 Among antenatal populations rates of vitamin D deficiency are estimated to range between 13–64%, depending on ethnicity.5

The Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition1 published a report in 2016 examining the most recent evidence regarding vitamin D and health. They concluded that maternal serum 25(OH)D concentration correlates with that of the neonate, and reflects the provision of a ‘store’ of vitamin D to supplement the exclusively breast-fed infant, given that breast milk is not a significant source. Therefore mothers with low levels of vitamin D are more likely to have babies who are also deficient. The consequences of this are less clear. Maternal vitamin D supplementation was found to reduce neonatal hypocalcaemia. However, research findings examining the associations between maternal vitamin D levels and other conditions hypothesised to correlate, such as gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia, low birth weight, and cognitive developmental issues, are inconsistent, with most studies having significant methodological limitations and small sample sizes.

CURRENT GUIDELINES

In light of what is known about the high levels of vitamin D deficiency in pregnant women, and the fact that maternal vitamin D stores reflect those of the neonate, the Department of Health recommends that all pregnant women take a supplement containing 10 µg vitamin D throughout pregnancy .6 Although the effects of vitamin D deficiency and supplementation during pregnancy is an area that still requires further research, supplements are considered very safe and the recommended daily intake is well below levels that have potential to harm.1,4

There is no evidence to support routine screening for vitamin D deficiency in pregnant women, even in high-risk groups. Testing for serum vitamin D costs around £20, so universal supplementation is considered more cost-effective.2 Measuring vitamin D levels during pregnancy should only be done if appropriate as part of routine clinical management; in the antenatal population this will primarily be patients with hypocalcaemia or symptoms potentially attributable to severe deficiency (generalised musculoskeletal pain, proximal muscle weakness, hyperalgesia, a waddling gait). Some of the milder symptoms may occur frequently in pregnant women, but it is worth considering vitamin D deficiency as a common, treatable cause of low-level antenatal morbidity. Those with confirmed vitamin D deficiency will require replacement rather than standard supplementation, which is beyond the scope of this article.3

THE ROLE OF THE GP AND PRACTICE NURSE

All women should receive advice at their booking visit about the importance of vitamin D supplementation throughout pregnancy, but the Department of Health also specifies that healthcare professionals have a responsibility to ‘... take particular care to check that women at greatest risk of deficiency are following the advice during pregnancy ...’.6

Free antenatal vitamins containing the recommended dose of vitamin D are available through the UK ‘Healthy Start’ scheme, to eligible women from their 10th week of pregnancy (Box 1). This scheme provides coupons to exchange for vitamins (as well as vouchers for free fruit, vegetables, cow’s milk, and infant formula). Women need to fill in a form, which can be obtained from midwives and health visitors, by calling the helpline, or printing it off online, and it must be signed by a healthcare professional. Women then receive coupons in the post to exchange for vitamins at distributing organisations, such as Children’s Centres, although local availability varies.7 Limited evidence on the uptake of ‘Healthy Start’ supplements suggests it is lower than 10% of those entitled;2 reasons cited include lack of awareness of the scheme among both healthcare practitioners and eligible women, difficulty of access, and a complex distribution system. Furthermore, women can only claim the coupons from 10 weeks’ gestation, contrary to guidance, which recommends vitamin D supplementation throughout pregnancy. Women who do not qualify for the ‘Healthy Start’ scheme can purchase vitamin D supplements over the counter. The national position regarding the prescription of vitamin D for those ineligible for ‘Healthy Start’ is ambiguous; it is not explicitly recommended and yet NICE guidelines advise that at-risk groups should receive free supplements.2

Box 1.

Eligibility for the UK ‘Healthy Start’ scheme

At least 10 weeks pregnant or have a child aged <4 years and they or their partner claim:

  • Income Support; or

  • income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance; or

  • income-related Employment and Support Allowance; or

  • Child Tax Credit (with a family income of £16 190 or less per year); or

  • Universal Credit (with a family take home pay of £408 or less per month)

Additionally: all pregnant women and girls aged <18 years, irrespective of benefit claims.

CONCLUSION

Maternal vitamin D deficiency is common and can result in low vitamin D levels in the newborn. Universal vitamin D supplementation of 10 µg/day is recommended to all pregnant women and preferably periconceptually, regardless of risk factors. Testing of vitamin D levels should be reserved for women with symptoms suggestive of deficiency. GPs and practice nurses should encourage women to take vitamin D supplementation throughout pregnancy and signpost eligible women to the Healthy Start scheme. Ineligible women can purchase vitamin D supplements over the counter but there is a need for clarity in the national position of whether or not they can also receive them on prescription.

Notes

Funding

This work was undertaken while Catherine Hynes was employed as an NIHR Academic Clinical Fellow in Primary Care.

Provenance

Freely submitted; externally peer reviewed.

Competing interests

The authors have declared no competing interests.

Discuss this article

Contribute and read comments about this article: bjgp.org/letters

  • Received December 5, 2016.
  • Revision requested December 27, 2016.
  • Accepted March 27, 2017.
  • © British Journal of General Practice 2017

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition
    (2016) Vitamin D and health, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/537616/SACN_Vitamin_D_and_Health_report.pdf (accessed 10 Jul 2017).
  2. 2.↵
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    (2014) Vitamin D: increasing supplement use in at-risk groups. PH56, https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph56 (accessed 10 Jul 2017).
  3. 3.↵
    1. National Osteoporosis Society
    (2013) Vitamin D and bone health: a practical clinical guideline for patient management, https://nos.org.uk/media/2073/vitamin-d-and-bone-health-adults.pdf (accessed 10 Jul 2017).
  4. 4.↵
    1. Food Standards Agency,
    2. Public Health England
    National Diet and Nutrition Survey Results from Years 5 and 6 (combined) of the Rolling Programme (2012/2013–2013/2014). https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/ndns-results-from-years-5-and-6-combined (accessed 28 Jul 2017).
  5. 5.↵
    1. Robinson S,
    2. Nelson-Piercy C,
    3. Harvey NC,
    4. et al.
    (2014) Vitamin D in pregnancy. Scientific impact paper no. 43 (RCOG, London).
  6. 6.↵
    1. Davies SC,
    2. Jewell T,
    3. McBride M,
    4. Burns H,
    5. UK Chief Medical Officers
    (2012) Vitamin D — advice on supplements for at risk groups. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/213703/dh_132508.pdf (accessed 10 Jul 2017).
  7. 7.↵
    1. Department of Health
    (2017) Healthy start. https://www.healthystart.nhs.uk/ (accessed 10 Jul 2017).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 67 (662)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 67, Issue 662
September 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Vitamin D supplementation for women before and during pregnancy: an update of the guidelines, evidence, and role of GPs and practice nurses
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Vitamin D supplementation for women before and during pregnancy: an update of the guidelines, evidence, and role of GPs and practice nurses
Catherine Hynes, Amrita Jesurasa, Patricia Evans, Caroline Mitchell
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (662): 423-424. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X692489

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Vitamin D supplementation for women before and during pregnancy: an update of the guidelines, evidence, and role of GPs and practice nurses
Catherine Hynes, Amrita Jesurasa, Patricia Evans, Caroline Mitchell
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (662): 423-424. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X692489
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • INTRODUCTION
    • BACKGROUND
    • CURRENT GUIDELINES
    • THE ROLE OF THE GP AND PRACTICE NURSE
    • CONCLUSION
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • How to manage low testosterone level in men: a guide for primary care
  • Hyperparathyroidism (primary) NICE guideline: diagnosis, assessment, and initial management
  • The atypical presentation of COVID-19 as gastrointestinal disease: key points for primary care
Show more Clinical Intelligence

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242