Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Access to medical records for assisted death: clarifying the guidance

Paul Teed
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (664): 515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X693305
Paul Teed
University of Bristol, Bristol.
Roles: NIHR SPCR-Funded PhD Studentship
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Noel Conway recently lost his appeal at the High Court calling for a judicial review into the blanket ban on assisted dying and stated his intention to seek permission to appeal to the Supreme Court. Regardless of outcome, uncertainty remains surrounding the practice of access to medical records when a patient seeks an assisted death abroad.1

The numbers of British citizens dying in Switzerland is increasing year on year. Last year 47 British citizens died at Dignitas alone and their UK-based membership rose to 1139 people.2 However, Dignitas is only one of three Swiss organisations that accept British citizens and so the true incidence remains unknown.

As part of the request for assistance to die in Switzerland a patient must provide medical verification of their condition. It is this that patients approach their doctors for in the UK to provide in the form of a written report or a copy of their medical records.

Following the Nicklinson, Lamb, and Martin case in 2013,3 the General Medical Council (GMC) clarified guidance on this issue by stating that doctors should be prepared to listen to and to discuss the reasons for the patient’s request. Any advice or information in response should be limited to:

  • an explanation that it is a criminal offence for anyone to encourage or assist a person to commit or attempt suicide; and

  • objective advice about the lawful clinical options (such as sedation and other palliative care).4

However, it is another GMC document5 that provides detail regarding the issue of medical reports and access to records: ‘... writing reports knowing, or having reasonable suspicion, that the reports will be used to enable the person to obtain encouragement or assistance in committing suicide … may also raise a question of impaired fitness to practise.’5

British Medical Association advice mirrors this6 and so if a doctor writes a report then the guidance is clear: doing so may result in a fitness-to-practise proceeding.

However, a second avenue exists that patients utilise: obtaining copies of their medical records.

CAN I REFUSE?

Patients report being refused copies of their medical records because doctors knew their intended purpose. In fact, the Swiss organisations openly advise those seeking an assisted death not to mention the reason for their request out of fear of refusal. Under the Data Protection Act 1998, patients have a right to their medical records, regardless of use or reason. However, access to a patient’s health records may be denied if ‘the information released may cause serious harm to the physical or mental health or condition of the patient’.7

If a doctor contacts their medical defence organisation regarding this scenario they will likely be given two options. Option one: give the medical records with a covering note stating that giving them should not to be construed as support or encouragement. Option two: refuse the request and let the patient appeal to the information commissioner if they so wish. However, if a request for medical records is refused by the GP due to fear of violating the GMC’s professional guidance this would be misguided, as the document goes on to state: ‘Some actions related to a person’s decision to, or ability to, commit suicide are lawful, or will be too distant from the encouragement or assistance to raise a question about a doctor’s fitness to practise.’7

These include but are not limited to providing access to a patient’s records where a subject access request has been made (in accordance with the terms of the Data Protection Act 1998).

I contacted the GMC directly to clarify the scenario whereby a doctor is aware upfront of the intended use for the medical records. The GMC responded very clearly: ‘... we have had legal advice to the effect that a doctor’s compliance with a subject access request even if they knew the reason for that request would be too far removed from the act of suicide to constitute encouragement or assistance’(personal communication, 20 March 2017).

Thus, even if a patient requests copies of medical records with the stated intention of using them for an assisted death abroad and the doctor then complies with this request, this is deemed an action too distant to raise a question about a doctor’s fitness to practise.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2017

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Davies M
    (Oct 25, 2012) GPs asked to provide patients with medical reports for Dignitas. Pulse, http://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/gps-asked-to-provide-patients-with-medical-reports-for-dignitas/20000658.article (accessed 22 Sep 2017).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Dignitas
    (2017) Statistics (Switzerland).
  3. 3.↵
    (Jul 31, 2013) BBC News, Right-to-die campaigners Nicklinson and Lamb lose battle. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-23506186 (accessed 22 Sep 2017).
  4. 4.↵
    1. General Medical Council
    (2015) When a patient seeks advice or information about assistance to die, http://www.gmc-uk.org/18_JUNE_2015_When_a_patient_seeks_advice_or_information_about_assistance_to_die.pdf_61449907.pdf (accessed 22 Sep 2017).
  5. 5.↵
    1. General Medical Council
    Guidance for the Investigation Committee and case examiners when considering allegations about a doctor’s involvement in encouraging or assisting suicide, http://www.gmc-uk.org/DC4317_Guidance_for_FTP_decision_makers_on_assisting_suicide_51026940.pdf (accessed 22 Sep 2017).
  6. 6.↵
    1. British Medical Association
    (2015) Responding to patient requests relating to assisted suicide: guidance for doctors in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
  7. 7.↵
    1. House of Commons Library
    Patient health records and confidentiality. Briefing Paper Number 07103, 25 April 2016. Patient health records and confidentiality, http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN07103/SN07103.pdf (accessed 22 Sep 2017).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 67 (664)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 67, Issue 664
November 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Access to medical records for assisted death: clarifying the guidance
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Access to medical records for assisted death: clarifying the guidance
Paul Teed
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (664): 515. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X693305

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Access to medical records for assisted death: clarifying the guidance
Paul Teed
British Journal of General Practice 2017; 67 (664): 515. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X693305
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • CAN I REFUSE?
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Being philosophical when it’s complicated
  • Sleepwalking into a two-tiered healthcare system
  • Books: 36 Hours
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242