Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Viewpoint: Resilience training, really?

Sarah Evans
British Journal of General Practice 2018; 68 (667): 80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18X694625
Sarah Evans
Currently not working in general practice, ongoing roles with organisations outside the NHS as Hospice Officer (Luton) and Out-of-Hours GP (Bucks Urgent Care). E-mail:
Roles: Ex-partner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sarahevans78@hotmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

‘Resilience training’ that includes yoga and mindfulness is one reason I despair of the RCGP.

It is unfashionable to say the good GPs burn out or leave. I regard delivering a surgery in the traditional ‘proper’ way, as a complex interaction between physical symptoms and emotions, held within the relationship of ongoing consultations with a nod to prevention and review of chronic illness, as now overwhelming. Reasons, aside from me being older, are multiple and discussed ad infinitum: increased workload; increased consultation rate; more intervention; people living longer; and they older and more frail. Secondary and community services are slipped into elastic, unmeasured, un-costed primary care.

Is burnout due to the GP becoming over-involved? If I could learn detached compassion, empathy without feeling, perform interpretive consultations without transference, then perhaps that would make me more resilient. However, my sense is that GPs who achieve this — who cheerfully meddle in their patients’ lives and deliver a decision in the space of 8–9 minutes — risk becoming patronising, judgemental, and formulaic.

In my view, if you do the job in the traditional way, it is an impossible burden. You will burn out. Clare Gerada’s ‘A new kind of doctor’ offers another, practical career path.1 Pick jobs where your time and capacity are respected.

Who can honestly say they accept the current contract, based on one doctor and 1800–2000 list size, and consistently deliver a reasonable service? Good luck to all you GP principals who soldier on at the front line, daily going over the top, with as many support and back-up staff as you can muster. In my view, this open-ended contract, based on head count, is now a folly, a mirage.

At Care UK, I can do a 5-hour shift and see patients at 15-minute intervals. They give me catch-up time, breaks, and double for mental health issues. There are no past medical records but every single patient is triaged and there is definitely one problem per slot.

As a locum, I can set my surgery length and ensure that, for every 150-minute surgery, there is an hour for catch up and admin — just for the 12–15 people seen.

These doable sessions are not available in daytime general practice, not for GPs and sometimes not for nurse practitioners either.

Many colleagues feel they have to sit it out for the sake of primary care, for the sake of our patients, for ‘continuity’. Has no one explained? General practice is being dismantled, just like the coal mines were.

We were generalists but the future will hold primary care specialists. These may be nurses, for instance, managing chronic diseases in an improved, patient-centred way. Surgical trainees will be in urgent care, adjacent to A&E. Community geriatricians will work in teams managing frail older people. Pharmacists will oversee the increasingly complex prescribing seen among the over-50s.

The RCGP, as well as our LMCs, understand this direction of travel, another reason for my distrust. What will be left for us old-style GPs are patients with chronic pain, MUPS, and other complex or multiple morbidities. These are the patients who are at most risk of falling further through the net of our new, Kaiser-style, NHS.

The NHS no longer wants us to do this work. Our targets are aimed at responding promptly to inter-current illness, reducing the risk of heart disease, managing chronic disease, supporting the informal carer, picking up cancer early, and keeping the healthy fit. Our health service is in re-design, to keep well people at work and in pace with available technologies.

The complex consultation that we struggled to learn and hone could hold, contain, and help our most needy patients. This work, rewarding while creating the risk of GP burnout, is now history.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2018

REFERENCE

  1. 1.↵
    1. Gerada C
    (2017) Br J Gen Pract, The William Pickles Lecture 2017: A new kind of doctor. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X693017.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 68 (667)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 68, Issue 667
February 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Viewpoint: Resilience training, really?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Viewpoint: Resilience training, really?
Sarah Evans
British Journal of General Practice 2018; 68 (667): 80. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X694625

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Viewpoint: Resilience training, really?
Sarah Evans
British Journal of General Practice 2018; 68 (667): 80. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X694625
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCE
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Reflections on COVID Christmases
  • Books: The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows
  • Ideas, Concerns, and Expectations for peace in the Middle East
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

Tweets by @BJGPjournal

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242