Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Debate & Analysis

Artificial intelligence in medicine: current trends and future possibilities

Varun H Buch, Irfan Ahmed and Mahiben Maruthappu
British Journal of General Practice 2018; 68 (668): 143-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18X695213
Varun H Buch
Cera Care, London.
Roles: Clinical Technology Lead
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Irfan Ahmed
Cera Care, London.
Roles: GP Lead
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mahiben Maruthappu
Cera Care, London.
Roles: CEO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Artificial intelligence (AI) research within medicine is growing rapidly. In 2016, healthcare AI projects attracted more investment than AI projects within any other sector of the global economy.1 However, among the excitement, there is equal scepticism, with some urging caution at inflated expectations.2 This article takes a close look at current trends in medical AI and the future possibilities for general practice.

WHAT IS MEDICAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?

Informing clinical decision making through insights from past data is the essence of evidence-based medicine. Traditionally, statistical methods have approached this task by characterising patterns within data as mathematical equations, for example, linear regression suggests a ‘line of best fit’. Through ‘machine learning’ (ML), AI provides techniques that uncover complex associations which cannot easily be reduced to an equation. For example, neural networks represent data through vast numbers of interconnected neurones in a similar fashion to the human brain. This allows ML systems to approach complex problem solving just as a clinician might — by carefully weighing evidence to reach reasoned conclusions. However, unlike a single clinician, these systems can simultaneously observe and rapidly process an almost limitless number of inputs. For example, an AI-driven smartphone app now capably handles the task of triaging 1.2 million people in North London to Accident & Emergency (A&E).3 Furthermore, these systems are able to learn from each incremental case and can be exposed, within minutes, to more cases than a clinician could see in many lifetimes. This is why an AI-driven application is able to out-perform dermatologists at correctly classifying suspicious skin lesions4 or why AI is being trusted with tasks where experts often disagree, such as identifying pulmonary tuberculosis on chest radiographs.5 Although AI is a broad field, this article focuses exclusively on ML techniques because of their ubiquitous usage in important clinical applications.

WHAT ARE THE CURRENT TRENDS IN MEDICAL AI?

Aside from simply demonstrating superior efficacy, new technologies entering the medical field must also integrate with current practices, gain appropriate regulatory approval, and, perhaps most importantly, inspire medical staff and patients to invest in a new paradigm. These challenges have led to a number of emerging trends in AI research and adoption.

AI excels at well-defined tasks

Research has focused on tasks where AI is able to effectively demonstrate its performance in relation to a human doctor. Generally, these tasks have clearly defined inputs and a binary output that is easily validated. In classifying suspicious skin lesions, the input is a digital photograph and the output is a simple binary classification: benign or malignant. Under these conditions, researchers simply had to demonstrate that AI had superior sensitivity and specificity than dermatologists when classifying previously unseen photographs of biopsy-validated lesions.4

AI is supporting doctors, not replacing them

Machines lack human qualities such as empathy and compassion, and therefore patients must perceive that consultations are being led by human doctors. Furthermore, patients cannot be expected to immediately trust AI; a technology shrouded by mistrust.6 Therefore, AI commonly handles tasks that are essential, but limited enough in their scope so as to leave the primary responsibility of patient management with a human doctor. There is an ongoing clinical trial using AI to calculate target zones for head and neck radiotherapy more accurately and far more quickly than a human being. An interventional radiologist is still ultimately responsible for delivering the therapy but AI has a significant background role in protecting the patient from harmful radiation.7

AI supports poorly resourced services

A single AI system is able to support a large population and therefore it is ideally suited to situations where human expertise is a scarce resource. In many TB-prevalent countries there is a lack of radiological expertise at remote centres.8 Using AI, radiographs uploaded from these centres could be interpreted by a single central system; a recent study shows that AI correctly diagnoses pulmonary TB with a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 100%.5 Furthermore, under-resourced tasks where patients are experiencing unsatisfactory waiting times are also attractive to AI in the form of triage systems.3

AI is a very picky eater

Developing ML models requires well-structured training data about a phenomenon that remains relatively stable over time. A departure from this results in ‘over-fitting’, where AI gives undue importance to spurious correlations within past data. In 2008, Google tried to predict the seasonal prevalence of influenza using only the search terms entered into its search engine. Because people’s searching habits change dramatically with every passing year, the model was so poorly predictive of the future that it was quickly discontinued.9 Additionally, data that are anonymised and digitised at source are also preferable, as this aids in research and development.

FUTURE POSSIBILITIES IN GENERAL PRACTICE

AI will extract important information from a patient’s electronic footprint. At first this will save time and improve efficiency, but following adequate testing it will also directly guide patient management. Take the example of a consultation with a patient with type 2 diabetes; currently a clinician spends significant time reading outpatient letters, checking blood tests, and finding clinical guidelines from a number of disconnected systems. In contrast, AI could automatically prepare the most important risks and actions given the patient’s clinical record. It could also automatically convert recorded dialogue of the consultation into a summary letter for the clinician to approve or amend. Both of these applications would save considerable time and could be implemented very quickly because they assist clinicians rather than replacing them.

As these systems become better validated, they will be given more responsibility. For the patient with type 2 diabetes, the threshold of statin commencement could be determined by AI on an individualised basis given nuisances of the patient’s history rather than a rigidly defined ‘one-size-fits-all’ algorithm. The research required for this ‘personalised’ medicine would only be possible through AI intelligently summarising enormous quantities of medical information. Furthermore, because AI is able to simultaneously monitor millions of inputs, it will have a significant role in preventative medicine. AI could proactively suggest consultations when it determines that the patient’s risk of developing a particular diabetic complication warrants intervention. In contrast, it would be impractical to task a human being with the responsibility of closely monitoring every test result and appointment of every diabetic patient in a practice in real time.

AI-based systems will also bring specialist diagnostic expertise into primary care. If an image of a skin lesion is sufficient to capably diagnose its aetiology, images could be captured at a GP practice and sent to a specialist dermatology AI system for instant analysis. Patients identified as low risk would receive instant reassurance while high-risk patients would experience lower referral waiting times because clinics would only be receiving selected cases. This concept is not limited to skin lesions, AI has shown potential in interpreting many different types of image data including retinal scans,10 radiographs,5 and ultrasound.11 Many of these images can be captured with relatively inexpensive and widely available equipment.

Future AI research should be directed towards carefully selected tasks that broadly align with the trends outlined in this article. Integrating these systems into clinical practice necessitates building a mutually beneficial relationship between AI and clinicians, where AI offers clinicians greater efficiency or cost-effectiveness and clinicians offer AI the essential clinical exposure it needs to learn complex clinical case management. Throughout the process it will be critical to ensure that AI does not obscure the human face of medicine because the biggest impediment to AI’s widespread adoption will be the public’s hesitation to embrace an increasingly controversial technology.12

Notes

Provenance

Freely submitted; externally peer reviewed.

Competing interests

The authors have declared no competing interests.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2018

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. CB Insights Research
    (2017) Healthcare remains the hottest AI category for deals. https://www.cbinsights.com/research/artificial-intelligence-healthcare-startups-investors/ (accessed 15 Jan 2018).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Chen JH,
    2. Asch SM
    (2017) Machine learning and prediction in medicine — beyond the peak of inflated expectations. N Eng J Med 376(26):2507–2509.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Burgess M
    (Jan 5, 2017) Wired, The NHS is trialling an AI chatbot to answer your medical questions. http://www.wired.co.uk/article/babylon-nhs-chatbot-app (accessed 15 Jan 2018).
  4. 4.↵
    1. Esteva A,
    2. Kuprel B,
    3. Novoa RA,
    4. et al.
    (2017) Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 542(7639):115–118.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Lakhani P,
    2. Sundaram B
    (2017) Deep learning at chest radiography: automated classification of pulmonary tuberculosis by using convolutional neural networks. Radiology 284(2):574–582.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Oppenheim M
    (Oct 20, 2016) Independent, Stephen Hawking: artificial intelligence could be the greatest disaster in human history. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/stephen-hawking-artificial-intelligence-diaster-human-history-leverhulme-centre-cambridge-a7371106.html (accessed 15 Jan 2017).
  7. 7.↵
    1. Chu C,
    2. De Fauw J,
    3. Tomasev N,
    4. et al.
    (2016) Applying machine learning to automated segmentation of head and neck tumour volumes and organs at risk on radiotherapy planning CT and MRI scans. F1000Research 5:2104.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Hoog AH,
    2. Meme HK,
    3. van Deutekom H,
    4. et al.
    (2011) High sensitivity of chest radiograph reading by clinical officers in a tuberculosis prevalence survey. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 15(10):1308–1314.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Lazer D,
    2. Kennedy R,
    3. King G,
    4. Vespignani A
    (2014) The parable of Google flu: traps in big data analysis. Science 343(6176):1203–1205.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Shead S
    (Aug 3, 2017) Business Insider, Google DeepMind is funding NHS research at Moorfields Eye Hospital. http://uk.businessinsider.com/deepmind-is-funding-nhs-research-2017-7 (accessed 15 Jan 2018).
  11. 11.↵
    1. Chen H,
    2. Wu L,
    3. Dou Q,
    4. et al.
    (2017) Ultrasound standard plane detection using a composite neural network framework. IEEE Trans Cybern 47(6):1576–1586.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Naughton J
    (Jul 9, 2017) Guardian, Giving Google our private NHS data is simply illegal. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/09/giving-google-private-nhs-data-is-simply-illegal (accessed 15 Jan 2018).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 68 (668)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 68, Issue 668
March 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Artificial intelligence in medicine: current trends and future possibilities
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Artificial intelligence in medicine: current trends and future possibilities
Varun H Buch, Irfan Ahmed, Mahiben Maruthappu
British Journal of General Practice 2018; 68 (668): 143-144. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X695213

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Artificial intelligence in medicine: current trends and future possibilities
Varun H Buch, Irfan Ahmed, Mahiben Maruthappu
British Journal of General Practice 2018; 68 (668): 143-144. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X695213
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • WHAT IS MEDICAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?
    • WHAT ARE THE CURRENT TRENDS IN MEDICAL AI?
    • FUTURE POSSIBILITIES IN GENERAL PRACTICE
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • An Australian reflects on the Collings report 70 years on
  • SAFER diagnosis: a teaching system to help reduce diagnostic errors in primary care
  • Emergencies in general practice: could checklists support teams in stressful situations?
Show more Debate & Analysis

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242