Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

Clinical pharmacists in general practice

Louise S Deeks, Sam Kosari and Mark Naunton
British Journal of General Practice 2018; 68 (672): 320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18X697625
Louise S Deeks
University of Canberra, Canberra. Email:
Roles: Pharmacist Researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: louise.deeks@canberra.edu.au
Sam Kosari
University of Canberra, Canberra.
Roles: Pharmacist Lecturer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Naunton
University of Canberra, Canberra.
Roles: Head of Discipline of Pharmacy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

All letters are subject to editing and may be shortened. General letters can be sent to bjgpdisc{at}rcgp.org.uk (please include your postal address for publication), and letters responding directly to BJGP articles can be submitted online via eLetters. We regret we cannot notify authors regarding publication.

For submission instructions visit: bjgp.org/letters

The recent article by Williams et al estimated that one clinical pharmacist post in Westbourne Medical Centre saves a GP 80 hours a month.1 Researchers in Dudley determined that 769.6 GP hours were saved by 5.4 full-time equivalent pharmacists over 4 months between September and December 2015.2 This equates to one post saving a GP 35.6 hours per month.2 We estimated the potential time saved for GPs by tasks being undertaken by part-time pharmacists in three general practices in Canberra, Australia, at 23% from May to December 2017. Assuming that a full-time pharmacist works 37.5 hours per week, our data suggest that 37.4 hours per month of GP time may be saved by one full-time pharmacist.

This comparison suggests that differences in GP hours saved may depend on the different activities undertaken by the pharmacists, their clinical experience, or the different methods of coding activities as a GP task.

Making a cost-effectiveness case for pharmacists in general practice is complex. Using GP hours saved alone underestimates the health economic value of pharmacists in general practice. Other contributions that can be considered include hospital admission avoidance due to safer prescribing,1,3 reduced drug costs,2 involvement in government payments for quality or specific services,1,4 and improved clinical outcome measures.5

We agree that using GP hours saved implies that pharmacists are ‘cheap doctors or expensive nurses’1 but feel that using GP hours saved will be a necessary component of cost-effectiveness calculations until pharmacists are universally accepted as essential to the general practice team.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2018

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Williams S,
    2. Hayes J,
    3. Brad L
    (2018) Br J Gen Pract, Clinical pharmacists in general practice: a necessity not a luxury? DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18X694697.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bush J,
    2. Langley CA,
    3. Jenkins D,
    4. et al.
    (2017) Clinical pharmacists in general practice: an initial evaluation of activity in one English primary care organisation. Int J Pharm Pract doi:10.1111/ijpp.12426.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Avery AJ,
    2. Rodgers S,
    3. Cantrill JA,
    4. et al.
    (2012) A pharmacist-led information technology intervention for medication errors (PINCER): a multicentre, cluster randomised, controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet 379(9823):1310–1319.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Deeks LS,
    2. Naunton M,
    3. Tay GH,
    4. et al.
    (2018) What can pharmacists do in general practice? Activities of pharmacists within general practice: a pilot. Aust J Gen Pract, in press.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Tan EC,
    2. Stewart K,
    3. Elliott RA,
    4. et al.
    (2014) Pharmacist services provided in general practice clinics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Res Social Adm Pharm 10(4):608–622.
    OpenUrlPubMed
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 68 (672)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 68, Issue 672
July 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical pharmacists in general practice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Clinical pharmacists in general practice
Louise S Deeks, Sam Kosari, Mark Naunton
British Journal of General Practice 2018; 68 (672): 320. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X697625

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Clinical pharmacists in general practice
Louise S Deeks, Sam Kosari, Mark Naunton
British Journal of General Practice 2018; 68 (672): 320. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X697625
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Recommendations for the recognition, diagnosis, and management of long COVID
  • Author response
  • Development and external validation of a new clinical prediction model for early recognition of sepsis
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242