Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Psychological tyranny prescribed by the DWP: preventable harm is government policy

Mo Stewart
British Journal of General Practice 2018; 68 (677): 579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18X700001
Mo Stewart
Wisbech, Cambridgeshire, UK. Email:
Roles: Independent Disability Studies Researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Mozzas01@gmail.com
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

GP’S OPINION OF PEOPLE’S SICKNESS NOW RENDERED MEANINGLESS

Influenced by corporate America, the commonly labelled ‘welfare reforms’ began in July 2006 with the introduction of the Welfare Reform Bill by the New Labour government, and guaranteed that claimants of long-term out-of-work sickness and disability benefit were to be coerced and intimidated by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) simply for committing the ‘crime’ of being too ill to work.

In October 2018 it will be 10 years since the DWP replaced Incapacity Benefit with the Employment and Support Allowance (ESA), adopted the Work Capability Assessment (WCA) to be conducted by an unaccountable private contractor to resist funding the ESA, and guaranteed that GP opinion would be rendered meaningless for chronically ill patients in need of financial support by the DWP.1

ALL MEDICAL EVIDENCE DISREGARDED

Access to medical history is not available to the private contractor who conducts the WCA, and the DWP administrators who allocate the ESA admitted to Professor Malcolm Harrington as long ago as 2010 that they don’t understand the medical paperwork provided by claimants to support their ESA applications.2 These DWP ‘Decision Makers’ confirmed that they disregard all medical evidence and simply confirm the findings of the WCA, which is described as a ‘non-medical functional assessment’.3

ALLOWING PREVENTABLE HARM

The former DWP Chief Medical Officer, Mansel Aylward, moved from the DWP in 2005 to the then named UnumProvident Centre for Psychosocial and Disability Research at Cardiff University, with funding by the American corporate giant who sponsored the new research centre with £1.6 million. Together with Gordon Waddell, Aylward produced discredited ‘policy based’ research4 in the 2005 DWP commissioned report: The Scientific and Conceptual Basis of Incapacity Benefits5 which supported the DWP’s planned course of action to demolish the welfare state.

DWP Ministers insisted that they were helping chronically sick and disabled people to take responsibility for their own financial future by searching for employment. In reality, various reforms to social welfare policies allowed preventable harm by the State to creep into disabled people’s lives. The flawed Waddell and Aylward biopsychosocial (BPS) model of assessment1 was used by the DWP to justify the use of the WCA, and the excessive use of sanctions against ESA claimants are known to cause identified preventable harm, including starvation, for those least able to protest.6

CREATING FEAR WITHIN THE DISABLED COMMUNITY

The previous psychological security of the welfare state, which had guaranteed an income for chronically ill and disabled people who are unable to work, has been totally demolished. It has been replaced by psychological tyranny, which escalated since the coalition government adopted austerity measures alongside the ongoing reforms to social security benefits. Resisting funding long-term sickness benefit was the principal goal of the DWP, which included the reduction of income for ESA claimants to the equivalent of the unemployment benefit known as Jobseeker’s Allowance; thus disregarding the additional costs of living with a disability.

Guided by the 2001 Malingering and Illness Deception Conference, there is a strong ideological resistance within the DWP as to the reality of the lives of chronically ill and disabled people who are not in paid employment. Influenced by the American corporate giant Unum (Provident) Insurance since 1992,7 future social welfare policies would create fear within the disabled community, with an NHS report advising that 50% of ESA claimants had attempted suicide at some point.8 The Waddell and Aylward BPS model of assessment disregards diagnosis, prognosis, past medical history and prescribed medicines. So does the WCA.

Footnotes

  • Author of Cash Not Care: The Planned Demolition Of The UK Welfare State. New Generation Publishing, 2016.

    https://www.mostewartresearch.co.uk

    https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mo_Stewart/publications

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2018

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Stewart M
    (2018) Preventable Harm and the Work Capability Assessment. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324587956_Preventable_harm_and_the_Work_Capability_Assessment (accessed 17 Oct 2018).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Harrington M
    (2010) An Independent Review of the Work Capability Assessment. (The Stationery Office, London) https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/70071/wca-review-2010.pdf (accessed 17 oct 2018).
  3. 3.↵
    1. Stewart M
    (2018) State Crime by Proxy: UPDATE. Corporate influence on state sanctioned social harm. An independent report. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325013167_STATE_CRIME_BY_PROXY_UPDATE_corporate_influence_on_state_sanctioned%20social_harm_An_independent_report (accessed 17 Oct 2018).
  4. 4.↵
    1. Shakespeare T,
    2. Watson N,
    3. Alghaib OA
    (2016) Blaming the victim, all over again: Waddell and Aylward’s biopsychosocial (BPS) model of disability. Critical Social Policy 37(1):22–41.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Waddell G,
    2. Aylward M
    (2005) The Scientific and Conceptual Basis of Incapacity Benefits. (The Stationery Office, London).
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ryan F
    (Aug 27, 2015) The Guardian, Death has become a part of Britain’s benefits system. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/aug/27/death-britains-benefits-system-fit-for-work-safety-net (accessed 17 Oct 2018).
  7. 7.↵
    1. Stewart M
    (2016) Cash not care: the planned demolition of the UK welfare state. (New Generation Publishing, London).
  8. 8.↵
    1. Pring J
    (Nov 30, 2017) Disability News Service, ‘Shocking’ NHS stats show nearly half ESA claimants have attempted suicide. https://www.disabilitynewsservice.com/shocking-nhs-stats-show-nearly-half-esa-claimants-have-attempted-suicide/ (accessed 17 Oct 2018).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 68 (677)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 68, Issue 677
December 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Psychological tyranny prescribed by the DWP: preventable harm is government policy
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Psychological tyranny prescribed by the DWP: preventable harm is government policy
Mo Stewart
British Journal of General Practice 2018; 68 (677): 579. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X700001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Psychological tyranny prescribed by the DWP: preventable harm is government policy
Mo Stewart
British Journal of General Practice 2018; 68 (677): 579. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X700001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • GP’S OPINION OF PEOPLE’S SICKNESS NOW RENDERED MEANINGLESS
    • ALL MEDICAL EVIDENCE DISREGARDED
    • ALLOWING PREVENTABLE HARM
    • CREATING FEAR WITHIN THE DISABLED COMMUNITY
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Rescued by a Reception Revolution?
  • Television: This Is Going to Hurt
  • Southgate’s sign
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242