Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editor’s Briefing

The Mind Gap

Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (680): 107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X701357
Roger Jones
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Getting on for 50 years ago, after his presentation to an undergraduate medical society, I had dinner with William Sargent, the great proponent of insulin therapy, ECT, and psychosurgery. It was not exactly a light-hearted occasion. I don’t think that evidence-based medicine or the transparent reporting of the harms, as well as the possible benefits, of interventions were on anyone’s agenda in those days. Not long before that I had read the subversive work of RD Laing, who viewed psychosis as something else altogether. Labelled an anti-psychiatrist, Laing was a cult figure in the sixties, although his views on the causes and treatments of psychosis appear, from today’s perspective, as weird and muddled. Both men had themselves suffered from mental illness. Yet, in a recent book about depression written from the standpoint of Darwinian evolutionary psychology,1 Randolph Nesse, an academic psychiatrist at Arizona State University, says that the treatment of schizophrenia has hardly changed in the last 50 years and depression scarcely in the past 20. We still have not found the fundamental cause of any of the major mental disorders.

This creative uncertainty forms the backdrop to what I think is an outstanding issue of the British Journal of General Practice, on the theme of Mental Health, and I hope you can find time to read through some really excellent contributions. Sir David Goldberg opens the batting with a trenchant critique of the current classification systems for anxiety and depression and of their relevance and utility in primary care. He proposes re-thinking and re-labelling common problems such as medically unexplained symptoms and hypochondriasis with less pejorative descriptors, and also advocates the use of simpler rating scales to detect anxiety and depression in primary care. This editorial is accompanied by two related articles which look, in different but overlapping ways, at how depressive symptoms develop, emerge, are experienced, and can best be confronted.

An editorial by Richard Byng and his colleagues and a Debate & Analysis article by Ella Bekhuis and her co-authors both report the development of a ‘network’ model to conceptualise and understand depressive syndromes which, they believe, can lead to more collaborative, personal approaches to treatment. Their ideas certainly make intuitive sense.

In an important editorial, Elizabeth England and Faraz Mughal reflect on the parlous state of community mental health services for children and young adults in this country, a topic that has received a good deal of media coverage in recent months. Despite the rhetoric, they aren’t convinced that the development of joined up services for children and young people at CCG/Local Transformation Plan level is progressing anything like quickly enough and also recognise that the NHS workforce problem is a significant barrier to achieving waiting list and other targets. Ten months is far, far too long for the distressed family of a disturbed child to wait for expert help.

There is more: a comprehensive look at which first-line antidepressant to choose, and guidance on the prescription of benzodiazepines in primary care. The mental health of older people is another subject of research. A systematic review carried out by Rachael Frost and colleagues, found that despite being open to and benefiting from psychological therapies, older patients with depression are far less likely to be referred for these therapies than younger people with depression. In the time-constrained general practice consultation the physical health of older people is frequently prioritised over their mental health. In a similar vein, Dan Liu and colleagues report that, although incentive schemes designed to increase the diagnosis of dementia were associated with a positive impact on QOF outcomes, they also appear to have some negative effects, including evidence of diminished patient-centredness of consultations, and poorer access to care.

Finally, Sanju George and Clare Gerada sound a warning note about the stresses affecting the medical profession itself, the importance of being personally aware and able to recognise the warning signs, and most of all, to do something about it. Doctors should take more responsibility for their mental health.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2019

REFERENCE

  1. 1.↵
    1. Nesse RM
    (2019) Good reasons for bad feelings: insights from the frontier of evolutionary psychiatry (Allen Lane, London).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 69 (680)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 69, Issue 680
March 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Mind Gap
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Mind Gap
Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (680): 107. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X701357

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The Mind Gap
Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (680): 107. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X701357
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCE
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Shock Therapy — Disaster Remodelling in the NHS
  • The Global Primary Care Crisis
  • Listen to Your Patient
Show more Editor’s Briefing

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242