Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Reflective practice and gross negligence manslaughter

Nathan Hodson
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (680): 135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X701561
Nathan Hodson
College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester; Foundation Doctor, Northampton General Hospitals NHS Trust, Northampton.
Roles: Honorary Fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The collective imagination of the junior doctor workforce was captured by the case of Dr Hadiza Bawa-Garba, a paediatrics registrar given a 2-year suspended sentence for gross negligence manslaughter. Up and down the country, outrage and half-truths circulated in the doctors’ mess. The rumour that the GMC had used Dr Bawa-Garba’s written reflections against her was particularly difficult to dispel. It was not strictly true — Dr Bawa-Garba’s portfolio reflections had not been used by either side — but nevertheless resulted in many doctors discovering that theoretically the GMC could use their own reflections against them.

THE WILLIAMS REVIEW

The backlash that followed was at the top of the agenda in February 2018 when Jeremy Hunt commissioned a rapid review of medical gross negligence manslaughter, led by Professor Sir Norman Williams. The review, which released its report on 11 June, aimed to support the creation of a ‘just and learning culture’.1 Although the report promises significant improvements to the investigation of gross negligence manslaughter, including the collaborative creation of an explanatory statement for this easily misunderstood area of law, and the removal of the GMC’s power to appeal tribunal decisions on the status of junior doctors’ reflections, many will be disappointed.

The review heard that, in a survey of 1000 junior doctors, 81% had changed their reflective style following the Bawa-Garba case.2 The GMC and BMA argued that doctors’ reflective practice should be protected by law, preventing it from being used against doctors in court, and thereby promoting frank engagement with this central aspect of training.2,3

The panel disagreed, arguing that justice demands that no evidence is withheld from the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS): ‘Where any evidence is material to a case, it is right that it should be considered.’ 1

However, in the interests of learning, the panel recommended that the GMC lose its right to access reflective practice (a right that it recently committed never to use).3

RISK AVERSION

This is unlikely to reverse trainees’ increasing reticence towards the portfolio. Even if the GMC cannot use written reflections in fitness to practise tribunals, the CPS can use reflections against a doctor who is being prosecuted. It is hard to envisage anybody risk averse enough to change their reflective style in view of the small risk of GMC involvement not doing the same in light of the smaller (but potentially much more severe) risk of CPS investigation. The report suggests that doctors’ wariness of reflection is based on a ‘misunderstanding of this power’,1 but this is unfair: an acute awareness of the potential consequences might make one wary of reflecting frankly on a case that had gone seriously wrong.

ENCOURAGING HONEST ENGAGEMENT WITH REFLECTIVE PRACTICE

The panel have attempted to reassure junior doctors. They comment, ‘it is possible to carry out reflection in a way that minimises the likelihood of it being used by either prosecuting authorities or professional regulators’ and note that ‘reflective notes are far more likely to be used in support of an individual rather than against them.’ 1

The problem with this is that it emphasises the potential use of reflection in court. The justification for denying the GMC the use of reflections was that reflection ought to focus on professional development. When reflective style is defensive and events are recalled with a jury in mind, the exercise has been fundamentally undermined. Such ‘defensive reflection’ serves neither justice nor education.

The outcry over the Bawa-Garba case arose from an underlying sense of constant threat, even permeating the apparent privacy of the portfolio. The Williams review tried to redeem the current system but its valiant efforts only perpetuate trainees’ siege mindset.

A change in the law on gross negligence manslaughter, perhaps introducing a condition of ‘intent’ or ‘recklessness’ as advocated by the Medical Protection Society,4 may be the only way to reassure junior doctors that the law is fair and thereby encourage honest engagement with reflective practice.

The damage to trainees’ trust in the reflective process may not be beyond repair, but bold action is required to create a truly ‘just and learning culture’.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2019

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    (2018) Gross negligence manslaughter in healthcare. The report of a rapid policy review. Department of Health and Social Care, http://qna.files.parliament.uk/ws-attachments/921290/original/180611%20Williams%20Report%20FINAL.pdf (accessed 22 Jan 2019).
  2. 2.↵
    1. BMA Medico-Legal Committee
    (2018) BMA response to Sir Norman Williams review. https://www.bma.org.uk/collective-voice/committees/medico-legal-committee/medical-manslaughter/bma-response-to-norman-williams-review (accessed 22 Jan 2019).
  3. 3.↵
    1. General Medical Council
    (2018) Williams review into gross negligence manslaughter in healthcare — GMC written submission, https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/Written_submission_Williams_Review_74084026.pdf (accessed 22 Jan 2019).
  4. 4.↵
    1. Hendry R
    (Mar, 2018) Gross negligence manslaughter does not exist in Scotland — is it time to move English law towards the Scottish position? BMJ 13:https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2018/03/13/rob-hendry-gross-negligence-manslaughter-does-not-exist-in-scotland-is-it-time-to-move-english-law-towards-the-scottish-position/ (accessed 22 Jan 2019).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 69 (680)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 69, Issue 680
March 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reflective practice and gross negligence manslaughter
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Reflective practice and gross negligence manslaughter
Nathan Hodson
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (680): 135. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X701561

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Reflective practice and gross negligence manslaughter
Nathan Hodson
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (680): 135. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X701561
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • THE WILLIAMS REVIEW
    • RISK AVERSION
    • ENCOURAGING HONEST ENGAGEMENT WITH REFLECTIVE PRACTICE
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Books: The Only Book I’ll Ever Write: When The Doctor Becomes The Patient
  • Being philosophical when it’s complicated
  • Sleepwalking into a two-tiered healthcare system
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242