Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Viewpoint: Treatment not Trident

Lesley Morrison
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (681): 190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X701945
Lesley Morrison
Scottish Borders. Email:
Roles: Retired GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lesleyjmorrison3@gmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
Figure1

On 22 September 2018, health professionals from all over the country, among them many GPs, joined thousands of people at Faslane base on the Clyde to protest about Trident and make the point that the resources being squandered on nuclear weapons are resources desperately needed by health and social services, and to combat climate change. ‘Treatment not Trident.’

As the General Medical Council states, the duty of a doctor is to ‘Protect and promote the health of patients and the public’ 1 and such are the potentially catastrophic health effects of nuclear weapons that we have a duty to ensure that they are never used, either intentionally or by accident. And the only way to do this is to get rid of them, to be leaders in international nuclear disarmament.

Disarmament is inextricably intertwined with climate change, the environment, militarism, and health and human rights. The poor will suffer most from the effects of climate change, the amount of land globally available for food reduction will reduce, and mass migration and increased risk of conflict will result. If a state involved in such a conflict possessed nuclear weapons and a lack of its leaders’ judgement and wisdom caused them to be used, the result would be total devastation.

In the same way that smoking was regarded as a normal part of life until doctors began to speak out about the risks and people’s behaviour began to change, doctors and health professionals are speaking out about the risks of nuclear weapons. And, in the same way that the tobacco industry did not like what they had to say, the arms industry resists the evidence about the profit motive and the lack of regard for human health and wellbeing behind the arms industry.

Trident has been an obscene presence in the beautiful Firth of Clyde for too long. And for so long that people have generally stopped thinking about it: it has become the elephant, not in the room, but in the Clyde. The message from the Faslane demonstration was that we are going to ensure that people no longer ignore it.

Many of the health professionals spreading this message are members of Medact (https://www.medact.org/), an organisation working for a better, fairer, safer world and campaigning to get rid of Trident. Medact’s disarmament work is supported by the position of the British Medical Association and the World Medical Association, and it is the British affiliate of International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (https://www.ippnw.org/), winner of the Nobel Peace Prize in 1985, and an affiliate of the International Campaign for the Abolition of Nuclear Weapons (https://www.icanw.org/), this year’s Nobel Peace Prize winner. Medact members believe that it is their professional responsibility to care, not just for individual patients, their families, and their community, but for the global community.

At the RCGP conference in October 2018, a session chaired by Dr David Blane, Clinical Academic Fellow at the University of Glasgow, discussed general practice communities and the connections between global health and local networks. To be actively engaged in global health you don’t need to travel and work overseas: you can contribute from your base in this country. A member of the RCGP Junior International Committee described how, by joining it, she had ‘found her tribe’. Many members of Medact and similar organisations feel that they belong to a family of like-minded people who see health in a wider context. At a time when so many GPs and junior doctors feel isolated and stressed, offering such support and connection is valuable and important.

On the evening before Faslane, a meeting in Glasgow of those going to the demo heard Pete Ritchie, Executive Director of Nourish Scotland (http://www.nourishscotland.org/), speak about food as an issue of human rights. The world has enough food to feed all its people. The fact that it is used as a profit-making commodity means that millions starve.

Putting people before profit is fundamental to health care and it is a message that the military industrial complex exemplified by Trident on the Clyde needs to hear.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2019

REFERENCE

  1. 1.↵
    1. General Medical Council
    (2019) The duties of a doctor registered with the General Medical Council. https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/good-medical-practice/duties-of-a-doctor (accessed 7 Mar 2019).
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 69 (681)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 69, Issue 681
April 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Viewpoint: Treatment not Trident
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Viewpoint: Treatment not Trident
Lesley Morrison
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (681): 190. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X701945

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Viewpoint: Treatment not Trident
Lesley Morrison
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (681): 190. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X701945
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCE
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Ambivalent sexism within medicine: reflections from four medical students
  • Books: long read: The Doctor Who Fooled The World. Andrew Wakefield’s War On Vaccines
  • Lady Pereira Gray: an appreciation
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242