Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Bad Medicine: Advanced practitioners versus doctors

Des Spence
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (681): 199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X702041
Des Spence
Maryhill Health Centre, Glasgow.
Roles: GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

We don’t have enough doctors. This is odd because we have plenty of applicants, good universities, and the money spent on training is a fraction of the cost incurred by a limited supply. For example, locum costs in primary care are £500 a day and, incredibly, some consultants are being paid £375 000 a year.1 Scarcity is highly profitable.

Is this scarcity by intent? An attempt over generations by doctors to maintain high pay and the status of the profession with no care for the negative impact on patients? Consider also if the NHS had more doctors and shorter waits, would anyone pay to go private? The profits made in private practice are eye-watering. But scarcity is causing care to break down across the country and patients are suffering. Doctors maintain an air of superiority and entitlement, and the profession isn’t going to change as it is steeped in its own vested interests. The public deserve better from the NHS and our profession.

But becoming a doctor has little to do with ability and everything to do with opportunity and class, with 80% of doctors coming from 20% of schools, and 50% of secondary schools having no applicants for medicine in a 5-year period. A 6-year undergraduate course is simply not an option to the many and is reserved for the privileged few.2 Talent wasted. Something must change and that change is coming. The other professions — nursing, pharmacy, physiotherapy, and our paramedics — are stepping up with the rise of the advanced practitioners (APs). These professions are stuffed with able and motivated people, many of whom were denied the opportunity to study medicine.

So can APs do all the tasks of doctors? Spare me the pseudoscience research base. From my extensive personal experience, and with the right training, they absolutely can.

Doctors are deeply conflicted by the rise of APs, seeing it not only as helping to improve access but also as a threat to their status. The genie in the bottle is prescribing rights, allowing truly independent practice for the first time. Doctors have always wielded all the power in health care, always had the ear of the politicians and the media, and been a brake on real reform. But now there are unstoppable economic pressures blurring the professional barriers between doctors and the other professions. Breaking doctors’ monopoly position will have profound effects on health care and lead to improvement in care and access.

There is a need for APs to organise and assert themselves. These are new roles and need resources and support — the costs are a fraction of those squandered on locums. And, as undergraduate medicine training is only accessible to the privileged few, then allowing new paths to a medical degree through developing AP roles seems an obvious way forward.

It is time to break the outdated mould of medical training, and time to deliver much more equity in status and pay between the professions. Change is the best medicine.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2019

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Press Association
    (Feb 11, 2017) NHS ‘pays £7.5m a year for 20 most expensive agency doctors’ Guardian, https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/society/2017/feb/11/nhs-pays-out-75m-annually-for-20-most-expensive-agency-doctors (accessed 6 Mar 2019).
  2. 2.↵
    1. British Medical Association
    (2015) The right mix. How the medical profession is diversifying its workforce. https://www.bma.org.uk/features/therightmix/ (accessed 6 Mar 2019).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 69 (681)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 69, Issue 681
April 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bad Medicine: Advanced practitioners versus doctors
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Bad Medicine: Advanced practitioners versus doctors
Des Spence
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (681): 199. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X702041

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Bad Medicine: Advanced practitioners versus doctors
Des Spence
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (681): 199. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X702041
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Depreciating assets: the female experience of health in the UK
  • Yonder: Autism, home visits, suicidal ideation, and young sudden cardiac death
  • Bullying during COVID-19: the impact on child and adolescent health
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242