Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Books: Handbook of Primary Care Ethics

Brave New Ethics

David Jewell
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (681): 200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X702053
David Jewell
Bristol, and Former Editor, . Email:
Roles: Locum GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mdjewell99@gmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
Andrew Papanikitas, John Spicer CRC Press, 2018, PB, 454pp, £40.99, 978-1785230905
Figure1

Back in the Devonian era when I was a medical student, ethics simply did not figure in the curriculum. Shortly before that a new law permitting abortion had been passed; renal transplants were becoming commonplace (cardiac transplants soon to follow); huge advances were improving survival of premature babies; and in vitro fertilisation was around the corner. But there was no felt need for undergraduates to learn about ethics. It wasn’t that ethical questions didn’t arise, but in the paternalistic atmosphere of the time doctors didn’t expect to be questioned, or to have to justify the grounds on which they made decisions. Universal agreement that we all need to understand and grapple with the moral dimension of medicine has forced the subject onto the syllabus everywhere. With that has come increasingly varied ways of examining medical ethics, together with a growing understanding that moral questions abound, and not just the big beasts of abortion, brain stem death, and euthanasia. It’s one of the many changes that have transformed medical practice in the last 50 years.

To emphasise the change, here is this book; 44 chapters by 49 authors, all 420 pages of it. As if to drive the point home, this is not a book of medical ethics in general: it’s only about ethics for primary care. After initial admiration at the editors’ completion of this task, one immediately looks to see how they have managed to fill the space. It’s all here: general principles, including the need for compassion; thoughts about complementary medicine; application in routine consultations; learning and teaching; mental health; children and older patients; research; multidisciplinary teams; narrative; and much else besides. Keeping up with the kind of work GPs are now called upon to do, the final section of the book deals with distributive justice, commissioning, self-care, and regulation.

As in any multi-author work there is some repetition, but the overall standard is high and consistent. There are some gems: a chapter on caring for families by the late Micky Weingarten; another by Paquita de Zulueta discussing our obligations towards migrants; a warning about teaching students in our practices; and a guide about the ethics of research in which Jonathan Ives advises any reader who ‘… is yet to be convinced of the need to pay attention to research ethics … to seek a new profession’.

In contrast there are places where the ethical content is less easy to discern. A chapter on benefits and harms seems, at first, to owe little to moral principles. Similarly one on musculoskeletal problems. There’s one chapter where the word ethics never appears. But the key to such content is there. In a chapter on ‘Fat politics and medical education’ Jonathon Tomlinson spells out that this is not directly about medical ethics, but about the ethical behaviour of primary care professionals, how it’s learnt, and how it can be improved. The editors supply the key to the book in their introduction. What we do is defined by the breadth of problems we deal with and the skills we use to solve them. The book tries to cover a range of topics as wide as primary care and reminds us, time and again, that there is a moral dimension to everything we do. It doesn’t matter much that some of the chapters seem a bit peripheral. They add to the overall message, and that does matter a great deal.

Does all the learning mean we are doing so much better than our forebears? I wish I knew. They had rough and ready ways of recognising and dealing with ethical matters. My own beloved teacher told me that if he saw any difficulty he always imagined the patient as a close relative and asked himself what that person would want. Even then I could see the weakness of such an approach. But recent medical experiences of friends and relatives suggest that many doctors still take too much for granted, such as assuming consent for investigations and referrals. Perhaps the general level of understanding is better. There does seem to be much more awareness of the need to respect patients’ autonomy. Understanding the need for compassion makes practice without it indefensible. Change does happen, though more slowly than we might want. This book won’t transform medical practice instantly but it adds its collective voice to the forces pulling us all in the right direction.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2019
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 69 (681)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 69, Issue 681
April 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Books: Handbook of Primary Care Ethics
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Books: Handbook of Primary Care Ethics
David Jewell
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (681): 200. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X702053

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Books: Handbook of Primary Care Ethics
David Jewell
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (681): 200. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X702053
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Ambivalent sexism within medicine: reflections from four medical students
  • Books: long read: The Doctor Who Fooled The World. Andrew Wakefield’s War On Vaccines
  • Lady Pereira Gray: an appreciation
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242