Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Grey matter

Saul Miller
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (681): 202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X702089
Saul Miller
Wooler, Northumberland.
Roles: GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
Figure1

Despite the confident claim by (Bournemouth-based) the Echo that its Christchurch borough has ‘the highest population of over 85s in the UK’,1 I can’t shake the feeling that my practice patch is in the running on this one. As the young continue their flight to the cities, it is predominantly retirees moving out in the opposite direction. No matter though that most might be fit and active when they come, time takes its toll.

Life expectancy may have stalled2 in the UK in recent years but a recent study shows that the number of tests ordered in primary care continues to rise.3 Between 2000 and 2015, the average rate of increase was 8.5% apparently. The hallowed ‘test of time’ would appear to be fading from view.

An accompanying editorial4 to the tests study focuses on over-testing and over-medicalisation despite noting that the data itself say nothing about what is driving the rise. Though written by GPs (albeit Irish academics so not working in the NHS), their article does not mention the idea of shifting roles. This is a mistake.

My own perception is that, though I am sure plenty of test ordering goes beyond what is strictly necessary in all medical disciplines, this century has already seen a significant further shift in the role of the GP towards being physician generalists.

Some examples of what I mean: with long-stay geriatric beds closed, the patients who once occupied them are now cared for beyond the ken of hospital medicine; the rise and rise of day-case surgery means that most of the post-operative problems that arise do so in primary care, not on the hospital ward; and primary care has had its own flowering in the form of chronic disease management and toxic drug monitoring.

To focus too hard on the idea that most testing is needless is to risk missing this point of how much is appropriate to the role as it now is.

A target that Northumberland practices were asked to meet this year is to reduce antibiotic prescribing levels to the mean for England 5 years ago, in 2013–2014. At first hearing, it might seem it ought not to be too difficult to revert to a pattern of behaviour only so recently the norm. Yet with most of the year gone, it appears that virtually no practice will meet this target. So why are we all failing on that?

The truth is that the context always changes. This applies to me personally: I am not the same doctor I was, and the experiences and influences of the past 5 years will necessarily have made a difference. It is also true for each of my patients: they too are constantly changing. Crucially, though, the medicine I practise on them is also constantly evolving — I am investigating and managing illness more actively than I have ever done.

Grudgingly, I might perhaps concede that more is going on in hospitals too, though only to highlight that their customers mostly return not cured but with something new added to their problem list.

The future does not look like the past, even the recent past. Trust the Echo on this.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2019

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. News
    (Apr 30, 2018) Daily Echo, Christchurch ‘has highest population of over 85s in UK’ https://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/16192874.christchurch-now-has-the-highest-population-of-over-85s-in-uk/ (accessed 5 Mar 2019).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Office for National Statistics
    (2018) National life tables, UK: 2015 to 2017, https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/lifeexpectancies/bulletins/nationallifetablesunitedkingdom/2015to2017 (accessed 5 Mar 2019).
  3. 3.↵
    1. O’Sullivan JW,
    2. Stevens S,
    3. Hobbs FDR,
    4. et al.
    (2018) Temporal trends in use of tests in UK primary care, 2000–15: retrospective analysis of 250 million tests. BMJ 363:k4666.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Wallace E,
    2. Fahey T
    (2018) Use of tests in UK primary care. BMJ 363:k4895.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 69 (681)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 69, Issue 681
April 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Grey matter
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Grey matter
Saul Miller
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (681): 202. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X702089

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Grey matter
Saul Miller
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (681): 202. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X702089
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Ambivalent sexism within medicine: reflections from four medical students
  • Books: long read: The Doctor Who Fooled The World. Andrew Wakefield’s War On Vaccines
  • Lady Pereira Gray: an appreciation
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242