Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Debrief: Consultation length matters

Euan Lawson
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (682): 241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X702473
Euan Lawson
Email:
Roles: Deputy Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: euanlawson@gmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

The second BJGP Research Conference went out in style with a stirring keynote from Clare Gerada. She suggested, provocatively, that GPs need to stop being martyrs and decide what they are going to give up. We can’t do it all and we have to let go of something to sustain ourselves.

She offered one idea: we should abandon care of the very frail, very old patients. Let’s give it back to geriatricians and teams with the specialist skills. I’ll leave her to argue that one. She also mentioned, en passant, the problem of 10-minute consultations and I’ll take up the argument.

The 10-minute consultation is a glaring lose–lose that now represents a singular failure in the structure of UK general practice. They are a disservice to our patients and, importantly, to ourselves.

A systematic review of average GP consultation times in 2017 placed the UK firmly in global mid-table mediocrity with an average of less than 10 minutes.1 Most European colleagues enjoy upwards of 15 minutes, with Sweden, Bulgaria, and the US revelling in 20 minutes for their average consultation time. The routine 10-minute consultation is indefensible and getting more unjustifiable with every passing month as complexity and multimorbidity bite. We could, in every practice in the country, simply choose longer consults. It’s in our own hands.

This is the martyrdom to which Clare Gerada referred. I’d suggest it is even a form of groupthink: the desire to avoid conflict among well-meaning GPs has resulted in the perpetuation of an irrational situation. Anxieties about patients waiting for appointments might be raised in opposition to change. So naysayers are shushed and GPs who can’t cope with 10-minute consultations feel instead the cheek-burning shame of personal failure. Undoubtedly some practices have moved to longer consultations. I fear, though this is anecdotal and based on my local experience, that it is the relatively affluent areas where longer consultations are the norm. Tudor Hart is never far away from any discussion in UK general practice.

Why have we allowed this to continue unchallenged? We should be rising up with righteous indignation, pitchforks in hand. One clue may be in our fundamental motivations. The entomologist EO Wilson studied the sociobiology of ants and, like them, we are also eusocial creatures. Humans can be selfish but we regularly commit ourselves to the needs of the larger community. He’d recognise us in his models. Michael Harris would label GPs and the practice model as a classic example of super-cooperators.2 We work together, self-sacrificing, for families, for patients and communities, and for the NHS. Disruption, even one that results in long-term gains, is not welcome.

I’ve sat in several meetings recently where concern about portfolio careers has been raised by senior leaders. It goes like this: young GPs need to buckle down and learn the trade before they diversify. The word ‘lofty’ hangs unsaid but implied when it comes to those career ambitions. These leaders are beacons of excellence and inspiration. They almost all experienced a period of time after qualification where they consolidated their clinical skills. It has face validity but it feels like a manifestation of survivor bias — perhaps we should call it a ‘thriver’ bias. Suggesting that inexperienced colleagues, on a training programme that everyone recognises is too short, with inadequate consultation time, should swallow modern workload pressures is a one-eyed policy of convenience. Blaming them, even indirectly or unintentionally, is beyond the pale when something as basic as consultation length has been left unaddressed.

In those closing moments of the BJGP Research Conference, Norway was held up as one of the few countries where GPs are content. Yet they have a continuing recruitment crisis and the evocatively named Trønder rebellion in 2017 was sparked off as work flowed from secondary care into primary care without the funding and resources.3 Sound familiar?

Workload pressures in general practice are complex, and rebellion may be more than we can stomach, but if we give up anything in primary care it should be 10-minute consultations.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2019

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Irving G,
    2. Neves AL,
    3. Dambha-Miller H,
    4. et al.
    (2017) International variations in primary care physician consultation time: a systematic review of 67 countries. BMJ Open 7:e017902.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Harris M
    (2017) Solitude: in pursuit of a singular life in a crowded world (Penguin Random House, London).
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kjosavik SR
    (2018) Ongoing recruitment crisis in Norwegian general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care 36(2):107–108.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 69 (682)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 69, Issue 682
May 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Debrief: Consultation length matters
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Debrief: Consultation length matters
Euan Lawson
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (682): 241. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X702473

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Debrief: Consultation length matters
Euan Lawson
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (682): 241. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X702473
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • The tortuous path of progress
  • Books: Scattered Limbs. A Medical Dreambook
  • Books: Finding the Mother Tree. Uncovering the Wisdom and Intelligence of the Forest
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242