Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editorials

Models of paramedic involvement in general practice

Matthew Booker and Sarah Voss
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (687): 477-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X705605
Matthew Booker
Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Roles: NIHR Clinical Lecturer in Primary Care
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Voss
Centre for Health and Clinical Research, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Roles: Associate Professor in Emergency Care
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

INTRODUCTION

There is a continued increase in demand for both planned and same-day primary care. The reality that the number of qualified full-time equivalent GPs in England fell once more to under 29 000 at the end of 2018,1 means that new models of working are necessary if general practice is to withstand these pressures. In addition to committing to recruit and train more than 3000 additional GPs over the next few years, the NHS England GP Forward View proposes greater development of the multidisciplinary, integrated primary care workforce, capitalising on the value that allied healthcare professionals can bring support to front line service delivery.2 The recent announcement of funding for 20 000 additional allied professionals and clinical support staff over the next 5 years further founds a trajectory that more patient care should be delivered by non-GPs.3 The GP Forward View specifically highlights the skills of paramedics, and suggests that general practice should look to make greater use of this professional group.2 While acknowledging that scope of practice may vary, particular examples of perceived benefit include the management of minor illness, undertaking of home visits, and the provision of same day ‘urgent’ primary care.2

There are already signs that these recommendations are being acted on. The General Practice Workforce dataset indicates that there were 513 paramedics working in practices in England as of December 2018, a 71% increase on the previous year, outnumbering physician associates by more than three to one.1 There are also a variety of community admission-avoidance and ‘early visiting’ services establishing, with some early work underway to try and understand what might drive success in these schemes.4 Despite the clear policy direction, very little is known about the safety, clinical-, or cost-effectiveness, of paramedics working in primary care. Models currently in use include paramedics seeing same-day and urgent problems only, undertaking chronic disease clinics, performing telephone triage, completing home visits, or a hybrid of one of more of these. There are also a variety of employment arrangements and variable degrees of association with other community services. Few models, if any, have been subject to rigorous, academic exploration. Just as the numbers of GPs are squeezed, there is not an inexorable supply of paramedics. It is important to understand the true impact of a potential ‘brain drain’ on other areas of the health infrastructure, such as front-line ambulance services, before whole heartedly endorsing this professional shift.

SUPPORT AT THE COALFACE: THE THEORIES

Theories regarding how paramedics may support primary care centre around three main ideas:

  • paramedics seeing routine patients will release GP time to manage other patients, particularly the more complex patients where continuity matters most;

  • paramedics create additional capacity to see/visit urgent problems in a timely manner throughout the day, perhaps affording greater opportunity to access other community or ambulatory pathways; and,

  • paramedics may improve patient satisfaction and possibly clinical outcomes if they are able to see patients quickly and spend more time with them than GPs can.

The premise that modern day paramedics are also trained as ‘generalists’ from the outset of their careers, arguably makes primary care a suitable and relevant domain in which to practice. The unselected nature of cases across the entire age and demographic spectrum is typical of a paramedic’s sphere of practice, which is an attractive prospect for primary care. There are specialised skills required in a general practice setting that are less likely to be part of a paramedic’s core capabilities. These include the routine management of multimorbidity and chronic disease, a shift towards preventative care, and a mastery of more nebulous concepts as ‘continuity’ and ‘the therapeutic consultation’; argued by some to be the cornerstones of the craft of general practice. Others have suggested that the sheer crisis in primary care capacity at present negates these more nuanced issues, such that the existence of a professional group with an applicable set of core competencies should be wholeheartedly embraced for whatever support it can offer. As with other practitioner groups, paramedics will bring in additional skills and knowledge — particularly in acute care — that may be less developed in the general practice setting. These workforce and skill-mix issues have been well discussed.5

PARAMEDIC PRESCRIBING: DEFINING ‘ADVANCED PRACTICE’

The phenomenon of paramedics working in primary care will imminently step up a further gear, just as the first cohorts of fully-qualified independent paramedic prescribers started to put pen to prescription over recent months.

Prescribing by non-medical professionals is of course nothing new; legislation permitting nurses to prescribe was first drawn up in 1992, and further amended by the Health and Social Care Act 2001 to enable other health professionals such as pharmacists to lawfully independently prescribe. The recent legislation enabling paramedics to prescribe followed an extensive period of public and professional consultation.6 In order to independently prescribe, paramedics must be recorded as such on the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) by completing an approved programme of training.

There is an expectation that paramedics will be working at an ‘advanced level of practice’ before embarking on prescribing. Historically, terminology relating to ‘advanced’ practice has been inconsistently used, and has led to much confusion about specifically what different skills and level of autonomy a ‘specialist’ or ‘advanced’ paramedic might be expected to possess. Titles such as ‘primary care paramedic practitioner’ are also commonly used in job descriptions and policy literature. Important collaborative work has been led by bodies such as the College of Paramedics to standardise post-registration career framework descriptors, but roles such as ‘advanced paramedic’ are not always fully understood by patients or colleagues in primary care. Health Education England suggests advanced practice is ‘… characterised by a high degree of autonomy and complex decision making … underpinned by a master’s-level award or equivalent …’,7 and has also produced a core capabilities framework for specialist paramedics working in primary care.8 Before undertaking prescribing qualifications, paramedics are required to have a minimum of 3 years post-registration experience, and be able to demonstrate that they are working in a setting where there is an identified need to prescribe, with appropriate governance arrangements and support from employers.

The ‘need’ is likely to be uncontested if the paramedic is working in a general practice or community primary care setting, and GP surgeries that employ other non-medical prescribers are likely to have all the necessary governance arrangements already in place. Some caution has been levelled against the interpretation of the ‘advanced’ practice benchmark, as some institutions appear to take a broader interpretation of what constitutes advanced practice when offering places on prescribing courses. While there are those who voice caution about potential increases in unnecessary prescriptions (such as antimicrobials), there is no compelling evidence that this is any more of a problem for one professional prescribing group than another.

ALL PARAMEDICS AND GP SURGERIES ARE NOT EQUAL

For primary care, the challenge will be in embedding these practitioners into the system in the most appropriate manner for a given context. Different models are likely to be required to take account of the different professional backgrounds, capabilities, experience, and skill sets. The types of patients seen, the clinical problems managed, and the relationships with other acute and community services, will almost certainly need to be tailored to specific local need. The impact of the transition of a skilled workforce from ambulance services to primary care services must also be evaluated, particularly at a time where policy advocates the treatment of more ambulance cases ‘at scene’.9 It seems likely that there will be no ‘one size fits all’ approach to how paramedics are best deployed to support general practice, with different practice sizes, workforce composition, and demographics, requiring a range of ways of working. This presents a significant challenge for robust evaluation of what is most cost- and resource-effective, or which model improves access and clinical outcomes.

It has been argued that, with paramedicine becoming an increasingly academic discipline in its own right, the evaluation of the emerging role of the prescribing ‘advanced primary care paramedic’ should be driven by the profession itself.10 Understanding the impacts of the ever more closely overlapping professional remits will require a collaborative and flexible research approach that can adapt to a constantly shifting landscape. While the face value arguments for paramedics in general practice may seem logical and clear, research is needed to understand if and why it works, how it can be sustainably scaled, and what the impacts are on other parts of the system. Research by our team and others is underway to address this.

Notes

Provenance

Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Competing interests

The authors have declared no competing interests.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2019

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. NHS Digital
    (2019) General practice workforce, England, December 2018 final: experimental statistics. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/general-and-personal-medical-services/final-31-december-2018 (accessed 30 Aug 2019).
  2. 2.↵
    1. NHS England
    (2016) General practice forward view, https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/gpfv.pdf (accessed 30 Aug 2019).
  3. 3.↵
    1. NHS England
    (2019) Investment and evolution: a five-year framework for GP contract reform to implement the NHS Long Term Plan, https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/gp-contract-2019.pdf (accessed 30 Aug 2019).
  4. 4.↵
    1. Abrams R,
    2. Wong G,
    3. Mahtani KR,
    4. et al.
    (2018) Understanding the impact of delegated home visiting services accessed via general practice by community-dwelling patients: a realist review protocol. BMJ Open 8(11):e024876.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Nelson P,
    2. Martindale A,
    3. McBride A,
    4. et al.
    (2018) Br J Gen Pract, Skill-mix change and the general practice work-force challenge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18X694469.
  6. 6.↵
    1. NHS England
    (2016) Summary of the responses to the public consultation on proposals to introduce independent prescribing by paramedics across the United Kingdom, https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Paramedics-summary-consult-responses.pdf (accessed 30 Aug 2019).
  7. 7.↵
    1. Health Education England.
    (2017) Multi-professional framework for advanced clinical practice in England, https://www.hee.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/documents/Multi-professional%20framework%20for%20advanced%20clinical%20practice%20in%20England.pdf (accessed 30 Aug 2019).
  8. 8.↵
    1. Health Education England.
    Paramedic specialist in primary and urgent care core capabilities framework, https://www.hee.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/documents/Paramedic%20Specialist%20in%20Primary%20and%20Urgent%20Care%20Core%20Capabilities%20Framework.pdf (accessed 30 Aug 2019).
  9. 9.↵
    1. Limb M
    (2018) Ambulances should treat more and transport fewer patients, NHS Improvement says. BMJ 362:k4106.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Eaton G,
    2. Mahtani K,
    3. Catterall M
    (2018) The evolving role of paramedics — a NICE problem to have? J Health Serv Res Policy 23(3):193–195.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 69 (687)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 69, Issue 687
October 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Models of paramedic involvement in general practice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Models of paramedic involvement in general practice
Matthew Booker, Sarah Voss
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (687): 477-478. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X705605

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Models of paramedic involvement in general practice
Matthew Booker, Sarah Voss
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (687): 477-478. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X705605
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • INTRODUCTION
    • SUPPORT AT THE COALFACE: THE THEORIES
    • PARAMEDIC PRESCRIBING: DEFINING ‘ADVANCED PRACTICE’
    • ALL PARAMEDICS AND GP SURGERIES ARE NOT EQUAL
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Antibiotic stewardship: where next?
  • What needs to be done to address staffing shortages in health and social care?
  • Primary care and bipolar disorder
Show more Editorials

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242