Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research

Rehabilitation of patients after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke: pilot feasibility randomised trial of a home-based prevention programme

Neil Heron, Frank Kee, Jonathan Mant, Margaret E Cupples and Michael Donnelly
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (687): e706-e714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X705509
Neil Heron
Department of Primary Care, Keele University, Keele; Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast.
Roles: NIHR clinical lecturer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank Kee
Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast.
Roles: Professor in public health
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan Mant
Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Roles: Professor in public health
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margaret E Cupples
Department of General Practice and Primary Care; Centre for Public Health;
Roles: Professor of primary care
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Donnelly
Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast; UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research, Belfast.
Roles: Professor in public health
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Although the importance of secondary prevention after transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke is recognised, research is sparse regarding novel, effective ways in which to intervene in a primary care context.

Aim To pilot a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of a novel home-based prevention programme (The Healthy Brain Rehabilitation Manual) for patients with TIA or ‘minor’ stroke.

Design and setting Pilot RCT, home-based, undertaken in Northern Ireland between May 2017 and March 2018.

Method Patients within 4 weeks of a first TIA or ‘minor’ stroke received study information from clinicians in four hospitals. Participants were randomly allocated to one of three groups: standard care (control group) (n = 12); standard care with manual and GP follow-up (n = 14); or standard care with manual and stroke nurse follow-up (n = 14). Patients in all groups received telephone follow-up at 1, 4, and 9 weeks. Eligibility, recruitment, and retention were assessed; stroke/cardiovascular risk factors measured at baseline and 12 weeks; and participants’ views were elicited about the study via focus groups.

Results Over a 32-week period, 28.2% of clinic attendees (125/443) were eligible; 35.2% of whom (44/125) consented to research contact; 90.9% of these patients (40/44) participated, of whom 97.5% (39/40) completed the study. After 12 weeks, stroke risk factors [cardiovascular risk factors, including blood pressure and measures of physical activity] improved in both intervention groups. The research methods and the programme were acceptable to patients and health professionals, who commented that the programme ‘filled a gap’ in current post-TIA management.

Conclusion Findings indicate that implementation of this novel cardiac rehabilitation programme, and of a trial to evaluate its effectiveness, is feasible, with potential for clinically important benefits and improved secondary prevention after TIA or ‘minor’ stroke.

  • cardiac rehabilitation
  • pilot study
  • secondary prevention
  • stroke
  • transient ischaemic attack

INTRODUCTION

The immediate period after a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or ‘minor’ stroke is a crucial time to intervene to reduce risk of future cardiovascular events,1,2 with GPs often managing this secondary prevention. Organisational interventions in general practice for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease reduce mortality,3 and participation in cardiac rehabilitation programmes after acute cardiac events are associated with reduced mortality and morbidity.4,5 Home-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes may be as effective as those delivered in hospitals, with better compliance.4 However, although cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease share common pathological mechanisms and risk factors, the impact of cardiac rehabilitation and lifestyle interventions after stroke and TIA requires further research.6–8 Furthermore, physical activity, a core element of cardiac rehabilitation, is supported by different behaviour change methods including goal setting, providing feedback, and monitoring, and by using pedometers,9,10 but there are few studies of pedometer use by patients early after TIA or stroke.11,12

After systematically reviewing the underpinning evidence,7,13,14 The Healthy Brain Rehabilitation Manual, an adaptation of The Heart Manual,9 was developed by following Medical Research Council guidelines,15 and the results of a feasibility study, with service user input.7,14,16

The aim of this study was to conduct a pilot trial of the effectiveness of a revised version of The Healthy Brain Rehabilitation Manual during the acute period following a first TIA or ‘minor’ stroke.

METHOD

This study follows CONSORT reporting guidelines for pilot and feasibility studies,17 and the PREPARE trial guide.18

Study setting and participants

From May 2017 to December 2017, nurses working in ‘drop-in’ TIA clinics and scheduled outpatient clinics in four TIA/‘minor’ stroke assessment units in different Northern Ireland health and social care trusts identified eligible patients and gave them study information. Patients who consented to contact were telephoned by the researcher the next day and invited to participate in the study.

Eligibility criteria

Patients were included if they were aged ≥18 years, within 4 weeks of their first TIA or ‘mild’ stroke symptoms, with diagnoses attributed to atherosclerosis or small vessel occlusion.19,20 Patients with unstable cardiac conditions, contraindications for exercise training,21 or a previous cerebrovascular event were excluded. A stroke research nurse recorded their diagnosis and patients with a TIA and/or ‘minor’ stroke diagnosis who were eligible to participate agreed to be contacted, and consented to participate.

Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction reduces the risk of re-infarction, cardiac mortality, and all-cause mortality. However, the value of cardiac rehabilitation after a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or ‘minor’ stroke is untested despite these conditions sharing similar pathology with coronary heart disease. Patients who have experienced a TIA are at high risk of future cardiovascular events but early intervention after a TIA or ‘minor’ stroke may prevent further stroke and disability. As awareness of the importance of lifestyle factors rises, the best approach to implementing secondary prevention remains unknown. The authors therefore developed a novel home-based intervention, The Healthy Brain Rehabilitation, for use in primary care, using core components of cardiac rehabilitation to promote secondary prevention for TIA and patients who have had a ‘minor’ stroke. The results of this pilot study indicate that this home-based intervention has potential for clinically important benefits and improved secondary prevention after TIA or ‘minor’ stroke.

How this fits in

Data collection

At baseline and after 12 weeks, participants attended the NI Clinical Research Facility, Belfast City Hospital, for assessment; a minor protocol amendment, after 5 months’ recruitment, allowed the option of home assessments.

Measurements were taken of height and weight, waist circumference, resting blood pressure, and heart rate (using an automatic blood pressure monitor).22 The heart rhythm was checked for dysrhythmias (radial pulse; 1 minute) and sociodemographic variables, smoking status, alcohol intake (units in typical week before assessment), time from event, educational status, and current employment were recorded. A measure of deprivation (multiple deprivation measure) was derived from home address postcodes (nisra.gov.uk/mapxtreme_deprivation2010/default.asp), a family history was taken, physical activity was assessed (validated international physical activity questionnaire [IPAQ]),23 and a Mediterranean diet score was calculated using a validated questionnaire.24

A 2-minute walk test was performed twice, separated by a rest period of at least 30 minutes.25 Anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]),26 disability (modified Rankin scale),27 ‘readiness to change’,28 and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)29 were assessed, and a timed ‘Up and Go’ test was administered.30 All participants were invited to wear a wrist-worn, tri-axial accelerometer, for 1 week on their dominant wrist for objective measurement of physical activity,31 and to return this in a prepaid envelope.

The intervention

The Healthy Brain Rehabilitation Manual has been described previously.15 Briefly, it includes information about TIA and stroke, advice about healthy lifestyle, and a stroke risk reduction plan that focuses on a different risk factor each week for 6 successive weeks; and it promotes physical activity by setting and reviewing weekly pedometer step count targets. Telephone follow-up calls at 1, 4, and 9 weeks by a GP (Group 2) or stroke nurse (Group 3) supported its use.

Randomisation and blinding

An independent statistician generated random permuted blocks of 3 and placed the allocations in sealed, opaque envelopes, opened only after completion of baseline assessments. A research nurse, blinded to intervention allocation, undertook post-intervention assessments.

Study design

This pilot feasibility randomised trial comprised three study arms: Group 1 (control) received standard post-TIA/minor stroke care.13,32 In addition, at the end of their baseline assessment, Groups 2 and 3 received The Healthy Brain Rehabilitation Manual and a wrist-worn pedometer, with a daily step count and physical activity diary. Groups 2 and 3 were informed about UK physical activity guidelines and how to achieve moderate and vigorous physical activity intensity,33 reduce sedentary time, and set and monitor physical activity goals using the pedometer. All participants were telephoned at 1, 4, and 9 weeks, to address any concerns regarding their care.

Participants in Groups 2 and 3 were also asked to report weekly average step counts and encouraged to self-set step count targets,9 using the ‘5 As’ approach,34 motivational interviewing techniques,35 and a standardised format. Groups 1 and 2 received GP telephone follow-up; Group 3 received stroke nurse telephone follow-up. Diary records were reviewed at 12-week follow-up.

Data analysis

It was estimated that data for 40 participants were required to inform planning of a randomised controlled trial (RCT). An independent statistician, blinded to group allocation, used SPSS (version 23) to report descriptive statistics. Accelerometer data were compared with diary records, using a minimum of 72 hours’ wear time to define valid data,31 removing non-wear time (consecutive stationary periods lasting 60 minutes or longer) prior to analysis using the Esliger formula.36

Output data were categorised as sedentary time and light, moderate, and vigorous physical activity, adding the latter categories to calculate mean group moderate and vigorous physical activity.

Qualitative study

Participants, selected purposively by sex, age, clinical condition, and group allocation, were invited to a focus group discussion. Both stroke nurses who delivered Group 3 follow-up were interviewed jointly. The focus group lasted approximately 1 hour and interviews lasted approximately 20 minutes; all were audiorecorded with participants’ consent, and were transcribed verbatim. Primary questions related to research procedures, methods, and the intervention’s acceptability (full details are available from the authors on request). Two researchers coded the transcript content independently, using a deductive approach to content analysis; a third researcher helped resolve any differences in coding and to agree the categories and themes identified before discussion with the research team.

RESULTS

Recruitment, retention, and completion of assessment measures

During the 32 weeks of recruitment between 8 May 2017 and 22 December 2017, 28.2% (125/443) of clinic attendees who were diagnosed with a TIA and/or ‘minor stroke’ were eligible for inclusion (Figure 1). Of these patients, 35.2% (44/125) agreed to research contact, 90.9% of whom (40/44) consented to participate; 60.0% (24/40) were male and all were white British and/or Irish citizens. Previous cerebrovascular events or non-atherosclerotic diagnoses were the main reasons for ineligibility.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

CONSORT flow diagram for pilot study of a novel home-based prevention programme after TIA or minor stroke.

One participant (Group 3) dropped out before beginning the intervention because of work commitments; 97.5% of participants (39/40) completed the study and 12-week follow-up. Two participants completed baseline home assessments and both attended the NI Clinical Research Facility for 12-week follow-up.

Baseline characteristics

Participants included 24 males (60%); 26 participants (65.0%) had a TIA and 14 (35.0%) had a minor stroke diagnosis. Mean time from event onset to enrolment ranged from 15 days (Group 2) to 19 days (Group 1). Participants were aged 38–88 years; 67.5% (27/40) attained only high school level education; 57.5% (23/40) lived in the 50% most disadvantaged areas of Northern Ireland. Nine participants were ex-smokers; 11 currently smoked; and mean alcohol intake was <14 units/week.

Baseline distributions were similar across all groups for mean systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, waist circumference, and body mass index (BMI) (Table 1). For all groups, mean blood pressure was ≤140/90 mmHg; mean waist circumference and BMI reflected that most participants were overweight. Mediterranean diet scores were poor and mean total HADS were elevated, particularly for anxiety. Baseline IPAQ scores indicated that 21 participants (52.5%) were physically inactive, with 72.5% (29/40) reporting sitting for ≥5 hours daily. Accelerometer data were returned by all participants, but one dataset was excluded from analysis (<72 hours’ wear time). All groups showed similar sedentary time (approximately 20.5 hours/day).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Comparison of baseline and post-intervention assessments for pilot study of a novel home-based prevention programme for patients after a TIA or minor stroke

Post-intervention results

Groups 2 and 3 showed greater improvements than Group 1 in mean BMI and waist circumference; in Mediterranean diet, IPAQ (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) (MET [metabolic equivalent of task] minutes/week and sitting time), HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and EQ-5D-5L (quality of life) scores; and in a 2-minute walk test and timed ‘Up and Go’ test (TUGT) performance (Table 1). Mean daily pedometer step counts increased in Groups 2 and 3 (pedometers were not given to Group 1 participants). Three participants, all aged >80 years and frail, believed the pedometer under-counted their steps; five lost their pedometer; and one discontinued using it because of skin irritation. At follow-up, two accelerometers were lost in the post; and 37 returned valid data.

One participant who was a wheelchair user could not use a pedometer: their 2-minute walk test, timed ‘Up and Go’ test, and BMI were not measured. One stroke event occurred during follow-up in the control group. No adverse events were reported.

Qualitative results

Four participants (1 male, 3 female; 3 in Group 3; 1 in Group 2; age range 50–80 years) attended the focus group. Both stroke nurses (N) (female) were interviewed together.

Three main themes were uncovered as reported below with examples of anonymised supporting quotes.

Use of the manual

Participants and stroke nurses approved the manual, commending its physical dimensions and format: ‘So the size was nice, it was nice to handle, and it was very clearly written. There was good feedback from patients about the manual.’(N1)

In particular, pictorial information was noted in terms of encouraging behaviour change: ‘The easiest thing for me was, with regards eating, the picture of the plate with the proportions you should have on it. So, for example, half your plate should be vegetables.’(60-year-old male, group 2)

Some participants read it once; others re-read it after follow-up contacts: ‘I just read it as a one-off and … that was good enough for me … got an idea about diet and exercise, so the message was there.’(60-year-old male, group 2) ‘When the nurses rang, I was like, oh, I better get the manual out again and read over those sections again.’(83-year-old female, group 3)

Family members viewed it as a useful source for healthy living advice: ‘It works well when you read it and then discuss it with someone. She [the stroke nurse] could point out things … to pick up on.’(57-year-old female, group 3) ‘Yes, my daughter too [read the manual] … she tried to help me with easy to make healthy food.’(60-year-old male, group 2)

Study design

Participants identified no problems with the recruitment process and noted positively that participation provided the benefit of follow-up, which was unavailable within routine NHS care: ‘I thought that was a good thing … to have some aftercare.’(60-year-old male, group 2) ‘I was really glad that there was something there as a back-up because I wasn’t sure about the medication.’(78-year-old female, group 3) ‘I got quite a shock after my stroke … I was glad to have someone follow me up and to know if there is something I can do to avoid having another one.’(83-year-old female, group 2)

The stroke nurses suggested that it would have been appropriate to include patients with cardioembolic and previous cerebrovascular events, as these were ‘two things which restricted our recruitment’.

Few patients were dissuaded by the logistics or challenges of travelling to the assessment centre (travel expenses were covered): ‘It maybe put off some of the more elderly participants, who didn’t have any transport.’(N1) ‘The last time, it was bucketing [raining] … by the time I got home, I was drenched. So today I thought, I’ll take a taxi.’(83-year-old female, group 2)

Conducting assessments in local hospitals was not considered a better option. Baseline assessment and individually tailored goals were regarded as key intervention components: ‘I think the actual meeting is more powerful than reading the manual. The other thing was, you know you’re coming back, so you have that accountability.’(60-year-old male, group 2)

Participants recognised the standardised format of follow-up calls and perceived no differences between stroke nurse or GP delivery; follow-up facilitated compliance with the programme and, on average, lasted 5 minutes: ‘I don’t think it makes a difference if you’re followed up by a GP or stroke nurse because it’s all about the conversation and the questions you were asked.’(57-year-old female, group 3) ‘It was motivating … someone was showing an interest in you.’(60-year-old male, group 2)

Three telephone calls provided sufficient support and participants did not suggest any other format of follow-up.

Stroke nurses said they felt confident about delivering follow-up but commented that access to a patient’s electronic healthcare record would provide reassurance: ‘The thing which I found difficult was that we were phoning people “cold” if you like, there was no background.’(N2)

Pedometers were valued for self-monitoring physical activity, although one participant considered that their measurement was unreliable.

Stroke nurses lacked confidence to address problems regarding pedometers but suggested this could be overcome with appropriate training: ‘I’m not too good with technology plus I hadn’t actually seen the pedometer’(N2)

No issues regarding any assessment measurements were identified: ‘They were fine to do.’(57-year-old female, group 3)

Suggested changes

All participants and stroke nurses were positive about the intervention and the study: ‘It was a very positive thing to be involved with, with lots of positive feedback from the patients.’(N1)

One suggestion was to provide an option of using an electronic or paper version: ‘You would have to give people both options but, yes, it’s [an electronic version] a good idea.’(N2)

Participants described persistent symptoms following their event, including increased anxiety and fatigue, shock following diagnosis, and worry about further events: ‘Anxiety, it’s definitely a factor after my stroke. Just worrying about stupid things, things which might never happen … if I try to do as much as I used to, then the next day I’m very tired. Is that part of the stroke?’(83-year-old female, group 2)

Some reported difficulty with expressive language; others identified effects on memory or cognition: ‘One thing I found after my stroke, is struggling over words … I thought it would be better by now.’(60-year-old female, group 3)

Participants suggested that the manual should include information about these problems. One patient commented that outcome measures could include an assessment of cognitive impairment; others suggested giving accelerometer feedback. It was also suggested that more open questions would encourage dialogue in follow-up and that patients should construct questions for subsequent contacts: ‘There were a few things that I would have liked to have been asked … Perhaps, say, before the next time … write down a few questions which you would like to ask me.’(60-year-old male, group 2)

Adding a food diary was suggested, perhaps using smartphone apps, to emphasise patients’ ownership of their lifestyles: ‘You don’t know how bad your diet is until you write it down. I wouldn’t have thought I would eat more than three bars of chocolate a month but when it is written down, it’s more like 10 or 12.’(57-year-old female, group 3) ‘I have an app … it tells you the calories and so on. It’s good for accountability.’(60-year-old male, group 2)

Also, it was suggested that a 6-month follow-up might support maintained behaviour change: ‘As time goes on and you get the confidence that you’re not going to have another one, there is a danger that you can just drift back into bad habits … 6-month review might motivate you further to get into a real life change habit.’(60-year-old male, group 2)

DISCUSSION

Summary

This study reports the use of an adapted home-based cardiac rehabilitation programme in patients within 4 weeks of their first TIA and/or ‘minor’ stroke of atherosclerotic origin. More than one-third of eligible patients consented to research contact; 90.9% (40/44) of these consented to participate and 97.5% (39/40) completed the study. All outcome assessments were positively received and fully completed. These recruitment and retention rates provide evidence of the acceptability of the intervention and research protocol. Baseline assessments indicated participants’ potential for improvement in stroke risk factors. Changes observed in intervention groups (improvement in cardiovascular risk factors, including reduction in blood pressure and improvement in levels of physical activity) suggested that the programme may impact positively on stroke risk reduction. Focus group findings indicated that the intervention was acceptable to, and welcomed by, patients, and that the programme addressed a perceived gap in their healthcare provision. Participants suggested that some additional information, particularly regarding symptoms after a TIA, and outcome measures such as cognitive assessment, would contribute to the intervention’s further development and appraisal.

Strengths and limitations

The intervention was developed within a theoretical and evidence-based framework. Physical activity was assessed objectively using an accelerometer and blood pressure was measured using an automatic blood pressure monitor, which is equivalent to 24-hour blood pressure monitoring,22 a current standard for diagnosing hypertension.37 Patients were recruited from various levels of socioeconomic deprivation and educational attainment, and from different healthcare trusts, including urban and rural settings. The sample size of 40 was appropriate for a pilot study. Some authors have argued that pilot studies should have at least 9% of the main study’s sample size,38 while others advocate having a minimum of 12 patients in each treatment arm,39 giving a total potential sample size of 36 for this current study.

A GP led the study, including conducting the interview and focus groups, and it is possible that participants’ responses were affected in terms of limiting adverse comments. Blinding of participants, GP, and stroke nurses was not possible because of the nature of the intervention. However, engaging independent statisticians in randomisation and analysis, and blinding of the review assessor, avoided bias in group allocation and outcome measurements. Consideration should be given to adjusting the intervention and research methods appropriately for participants with a disability and to collecting resource use data, to assess cost-effectiveness. Participants had an electrocardiogram carried out as a routine clinical investigation at their TIA clinic appointment to check for dysrhythmias as well as being referred for a 24-hour event recorder, although these investigations are outwith the current research project. There is evidence that a radial pulse check is an acceptable method of detecting atrial fibrillation,40 although it does have limitations, so that it would be appropriate to use more novel methods of detecting arrhythmias in future research studies.

Comparison with existing literature

The results of this study may indicate that this intervention promotes physical activity, endurance, and balance, as reflected in the self-reported physical activity questionnaire, step count, timed ‘Up and Go’ test, and 2-minute walk test data in intervention groups. These findings concur with a 2016 Cochrane Systematic review,41 which found that cardiorespiratory and mixed exercise training was effective in reducing disability in survivors of stroke and that promoting walking increased mobility. The findings of the current pilot study confirmed the importance of managing post-TIA/‘minor’ stroke symptoms, including fatigue, mental health, and focal neurological symptoms.42 This intervention could be delivered by GPs to help maximise secondary prevention after a TIA or ‘minor’ stroke, particularly with the current emphasis on greater community management of these common conditions.43,44

Implications for research and practice

This pilot study of an innovative secondary prevention intervention, using core components of cardiac rehabilitation, for those experiencing a first TIA or minor stroke within the preceding month, has shown that an RCT to test its effectiveness is feasible, with minor changes to the intervention and outcome measures. The Healthy Brain Rehabilitation Manual is a patient-centred rehabilitation programme, suitable for use in primary care, with potential for important clinical benefit in a patient cohort with a high risk of stroke. This programme could be initiated by either primary or secondary care following the diagnosis of a TIA and/or ‘minor’ stroke. The patients could then be followed up and supported by the stroke nurse over the telephone, similar to the home-based cardiac rehabilitation model.

For the next stage in the evaluation of the intervention, the authors plan to undertake an RCT to compare the intervention with ‘usual’ post-TIA/‘minor’ stroke management. This trial will be powered to detect reductions in systolic blood pressure, which is one of the most important risk factors for stroke.45 Based on ANCOVA (analysis of covariance),46 and the current pilot study sample data, using a baseline standard deviation of 25.5 mmHg with correlation between baseline and follow-up measurements of 0.55, in order to detect a between-group difference in systolic blood pressure of ≥5 mmHg at 12 months, with 90% power and a 5% two-tailed significance level, 382 participants are required per group. To account for 15% loss to follow-up, 450 participants should be recruited per group (900 in total).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr Christopher Cardwell for statistical support and Professor Philip Reilly, the patient and public group, participants, physicians, and stroke nurses in participating hospitals for their support.

Notes

Funding

The National Institute for Health Research and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine provided funding for this study.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Office for Research Ethics Committees, Northern Ireland (REC reference 15/NI/0001) and registered as a clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02712385).

Provenance

Freely submitted; externally peer reviewed.

Competing interests

The authors have declared no competing interests.

Discuss this article

Contribute and read comments about this article: bjgp.org/letters

  • Received January 3, 2019.
  • Revision requested February 1, 2019.
  • Accepted March 11, 2019.
  • © British Journal of General Practice 2019

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Rothwell PM,
    2. Giles MF,
    3. Chandratheva A,
    4. et al.
    (2007) Effect of urgent treatment of transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke on early recurrent stroke (EXPRESS study): a prospective population-based sequential comparison. Lancet 370(9596):1432–1442.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Selvarajah JR,
    2. Smith CJ,
    3. Hulme S,
    4. et al.
    (2008) Prognosis in patients with transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and minor stroke attending TIA services in the North West of England: the NORTHSTAR Study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79(1):38–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Murphy E,
    2. Vellinga A,
    3. Byrne M,
    4. et al.
    (2015) Br J Gen Pract, Primary care organisational interventions for secondary prevention of ischaemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp15X685681.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lawler PR,
    2. Filion KB,
    3. Eisenberg MJ
    (2011) Efficacy of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation post-myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Heart J 162(4):571.e2–584.e2.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Rauch B,
    2. Davos CH,
    3. Doherty P,
    4. et al.
    (2016) The prognostic effect of cardiac rehabilitation in the era of acute revascularisation and statin therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies — the Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS). Eur J Prev Cardiol 23(18):1914–1939.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Lennon O,
    2. Galvin R,
    3. Smith K,
    4. et al.
    (2014) Lifestyle interventions for secondary disease prevention in stroke and transient ischaemic attack: a systematic review. Eur J Prev Cardiol 21(8):1026–1039.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Heron N,
    2. Kee F,
    3. Cardwell C,
    4. et al.
    (2017) Br J Gen Pract, Secondary prevention lifestyle interventions initiated within 90 days after TIA or ‘minor’ stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of rehabilitation programmes. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X688369.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Deijle IA,
    2. Van Schaik SM,
    3. Van Wegen EE,
    4. et al.
    (2017) Lifestyle interventions to prevent cardiovascular events after stroke and transient ischemic attack: systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 48(1):174–179.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Clark AM,
    2. Haykowsky M,
    3. Kryworuchko J,
    4. et al.
    (2010) A meta-analysis of randomized control trials of home-based secondary prevention programs for coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 17(3):261–270.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Heron N,
    2. Tully MA,
    3. McKinley MC,
    4. Cupples ME
    (2014) Steps to a better Belfast: physical activity assessment and promotion in primary care. Br J Sports Med 48(21):1558–1563.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Carroll SL,
    2. Greig CA,
    3. Lewis SJ,
    4. et al.
    (2012) The use of pedometers in stroke survivors: are they feasible and how well do they detect steps? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93(3):466–470.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Stoller O,
    2. de Bruin ED,
    3. Knols RH,
    4. Hunt KJ
    (2012) Effects of cardiovascular exercise early after stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurol 12:45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
    (2013) Myocardial infarction: cardiac rehabilitation and prevention of further cardiovascular disease CG172, https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg172 (accessed 14 Aug 2019).
  14. 14.↵
    1. Heron N,
    2. Kee F,
    3. Donnelly M,
    4. et al.
    (2016) Br J Gen Pract, Behaviour change techniques in home-based cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X686617.
  15. 15.↵
    1. Craig P,
    2. Dieppe P,
    3. Macintyre S,
    4. et al.
    (2013) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Int J Nurs Stud 50(5):587–592.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Heron N,
    2. Kee F,
    3. Mant J,
    4. et al.
    (2017) Stroke Prevention Rehabilitation Intervention Trial of Exercise (SPRITE): a randomised feasibility study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 17(1):290.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Eldridge SM,
    2. Chan CL,
    3. Campbell MJ,
    4. et al.
    (2016) CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ 355:i5239.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Bandholm T,
    2. Christensen R,
    3. Thorborg K,
    4. et al.
    (2017) Preparing for what the reporting checklists will not tell you: the PREPARE Trial guide for planning clinical research to avoid research waste. Br J Sports Med 51(20):1494–1501.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Siket MS,
    2. Edlow JA
    (2012) Transient ischemic attack: reviewing the evolution of the definition, diagnosis, risk stratification, and management for the emergency physician. Emerg Med Clin North Am 30(3):745–770.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Amort M,
    2. Fluri F,
    3. Weisskopf F,
    4. et al.
    (2012) Etiological classifications of transient ischemic attacks: subtype classification by TOAST, CCS and ASCO — a pilot study. Cerebrovasc Dis 33(6):508–516.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. American College of Sports Medicine
    (2018) ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription (Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia, PA), 10th edn.
  22. 22.↵
    1. Myers MG,
    2. Godwin M,
    3. Dawes M,
    4. et al.
    (2011) Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in primary care patients with systolic hypertension: randomised parallel design controlled trial. BMJ 342:d286.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Craig CL,
    2. Marshall AL,
    3. Sjöström M,
    4. et al.
    (2003) International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35(8):1381–1395.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Martínez-González MA,
    2. Fernández-Jarne E,
    3. Serrano-Martínez M,
    4. et al.
    (2004) Development of a short dietary intake questionnaire for the quantitative estimation of adherence to a cardioprotective Mediterranean diet. Eur J Clin Nutr 58(11):1550–1552.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Connelly DM,
    2. Thomas BK,
    3. Cliffe SJ,
    4. et al.
    (2009) Clinical utility of the 2-minute walk test for older adults living in long-term care. Physiother Can 61(2):78–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Zigmond AS,
    2. Snaith RP
    (1983) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67(6):361–370.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Burn JP
    (1992) Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale. Stroke 23(3):438.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Prochaska JO,
    2. Velicer WF,
    3. Rossi JS,
    4. et al.
    (1994) Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Health Psychol 13(1):39–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Devlin NJ,
    2. Shah KK,
    3. Feng Y,
    4. et al.
    (2018) Valuing health-related quality of life: an EQ-5D-5L value set for England. Health Econ 27(1):7–22.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. Podsiadlo D,
    2. Richardson S
    (1991) The timed ‘Up & Go’: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39(2):142–148.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Doherty A,
    2. Jackson D,
    3. Hammerla N,
    4. et al.
    (2017) Large scale population assessment of physical activity using wrist worn accelerometers: the UK Biobank Study. PLoS One 12(2):e0169649.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.↵
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
    (2019) Stroke and transient ischaemic attack in over 16s: diagnosis and initial management NG128, https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng128 (accessed 14 Aug 2019).
  33. 33.↵
    1. Department of Health and Social Care.
    (2011) UK physical activity guidelines, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-physical-activity-guidelines (accessed 14 Aug 2019).
  34. 34.↵
    1. Goldstein MG,
    2. Whitlock EP,
    3. DePue J
    (2004) Multiple behavioral risk factor interventions in primary care. Summary of research evidence. Am J Prev Med 27(2 suppl):61–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Rollnick S,
    2. Butler CC,
    3. Kinnersley P,
    4. et al.
    (2010) Motivational interviewing. BMJ 340:c1900.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Hammerla N,
    2. Ploetz T
    Open movement Standard procedures for (wrist worn) accelerometry, https://axivity.com/files/resources/StandardProceduresforAccelerometry.pdf (accessed 20 Aug 2019).
  37. 37.↵
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
    (2011) Hypertension in adults: diagnosis and management CG127, https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg127 (accessed 7 Aug 2019).
  38. 38.↵
    1. Cocks K,
    2. Torgerson DJ
    (2013) Sample size calculations for pilot randomized trials: a confidence interval approach. J Clin Epidemiol 66(2):197–201.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Julious SA
    (2005) Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Stat 4(4):287–291.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. 40.↵
    1. Hobbs FD,
    2. Fitzmaurice DA,
    3. Mant J,
    4. et al.
    (2005) A randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness study of systematic screening (targeted and total population screening) versus routine practice for the detection of atrial fibrillation in people aged 65 and over. The SAFE study. Health Technol Assess 9(40):1–74.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Saunders DH,
    2. Sanderson M,
    3. Hayes S,
    4. et al.
    (2016) Physical fitness training for stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD003316.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.↵
    1. Croot EJ,
    2. Ryan TW,
    3. Read J,
    4. et al.
    (2014) Transient ischaemic attack: a qualitative study of the long term consequences for patients. BMC Fam Pract 15:174.
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    1. Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety.
    (2011) Transforming your care A review of health and social care in Northern Ireland, http://www.transformingyourcare.hscni.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Transforming-Your-Care-Review-of-HSC-in-NI.pdf (accessed 7 Aug 2019).
  44. 44.↵
    1. NHS England
    (2014) Five year forward view, https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/5yfv-web.pdf (accessed 7 Aug 2019).
  45. 45.↵
    1. O’Donnell MJ,
    2. Chin SL,
    3. Rangarajan S,
    4. et al.
    (2016) Global and regional effects of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with acute stroke in 32 countries (INTERSTROKE): a case-control study. Lancet 388(10046):761–775.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Borm GF,
    2. Fransen J,
    3. Lemmens WA
    (2007) A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol 60(12):1234–1238.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 69 (687)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 69, Issue 687
October 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rehabilitation of patients after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke: pilot feasibility randomised trial of a home-based prevention programme
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Rehabilitation of patients after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke: pilot feasibility randomised trial of a home-based prevention programme
Neil Heron, Frank Kee, Jonathan Mant, Margaret E Cupples, Michael Donnelly
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (687): e706-e714. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X705509

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Rehabilitation of patients after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke: pilot feasibility randomised trial of a home-based prevention programme
Neil Heron, Frank Kee, Jonathan Mant, Margaret E Cupples, Michael Donnelly
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (687): e706-e714. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X705509
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHOD
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • cardiac rehabilitation
  • pilot study
  • secondary prevention
  • stroke
  • transient ischaemic attack

More in this TOC Section

  • The impact of remote care approaches on continuity in primary care: a mixed-studies systematic review
  • Performance of ethnic minority versus White doctors in the MRCGP assessment 2016–2021: a cross-sectional study
  • Trends in the registration of anxiety in Belgian primary care from 2000 to 2021: a registry-based study
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242