Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Bad Medicine: Nofreelunch

Des Spence
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (689): 620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X706997
Des Spence
Maryhill Health Centre, Glasgow.
Roles: GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

I am a nobody. A bang average medical student who found a home working in the inner city of Glasgow. I also felt like a square peg in a round hole but I tried hard to fit in with my chosen profession. Twenty years ago drug reps were omnipresent in general practice, providing lunch and restaurant nights out, paying for Christmas parties, and offering international trips and endless freebies. I accepted the status quo because it was all I knew, for the hospitals had been just the same. Doctors were entitled.

And when I became the local prescribing lead this largess escalated with offers of a lot more hospitality and highly paid ‘teaching’ opportunities. In the late nineties during the statin wars, a rep cupped my ear and simply said ‘money’, wanting me to promote Lipobay. I heard stories of far, far worse excess too. Money slewed everywhere. Doctors bragged that they were too intelligent to be influenced by the largess, but the prescribing numbers told a very different story. I stopped seeing reps because it just seemed the right thing to do. I then stumbled across nofreelunch. org, started speaking out, and wrote some complaints to the ABPI. Never did I imagine anyone would listen or take notice. But it was a message that many wanted to hear and things began to change. Freebies were limited, rules were tightened, and fewer drug reps were employed. It was certainly different from the past. I hoped it had all gone away.

But business is business and money is money. The industry retreated and regrouped. The industry certainly is less visible but no less active now. I hear the rising chatter of the hospitality culture again. This is not in primary care in the main, for our prescribing is limited greatly through the use of formularies and inspections. Money is focused in the hospital sector, which authors much of the guidance. It was supposed to be different, with a code for disclosure through the APBI, but new transparency is opaque as the code is voluntary.1

The industry is still spending big, with £50 million a year paid directly as cash to NHS doctors or as benefits in kind. Cash enveloped as ‘consultancy’ or ‘adviser’ fees amounts to around £30 million a year, equating to £1500 for each adviser contact. The rest is spent on supporting ‘education’ through the payment of conference fees and providing accommodation and travel — the average course fee is £450 and the average travel and accommodation gifts come to £500. In total there are 50 000 recorded payments to doctors, but there is no record of the huge number of unpaid contacts with the industry.2 Let’s also remember the old practice of ‘astroturfing’, where companies use charities and patients’ advocacy groups for product placement; the industry spends over £10 million a year on this.3

The policing of it is all voluntary, with no mandatory disclosures, so it is highly likely that the self-reporting does not reflect the real situation. And doctors are predictably hidden behind data protection legislation, so as little as 55% of payments can actually be attributed to individual doctors.

What to do? If doctors think their advice is so important to advance medical research, why not give it for free? Or give this cash directly back to the NHS? If consultants want to attend conferences then they should pay for them themselves. The conference circuit is just hospitality masquerading as education, and has little more value than a simple webinar. It takes two to tango, so why is there no mandatory obligation about disclosure from the GMC?

This is no way for public servants to behave and after two decades the situation still stinks. It’s time for nobody doctors to speak out; post your stories of excess because there is no such thing as a free lunch.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2019

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Disclosure UK, Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry. https://search.disclosureuk.org.uk/ (accessed 8 Nov 2019).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mulinari S,
    2. Ozieranski P
    (2018) Disclosure of payments by pharmaceutical companies to healthcare professionals in the UK: analysis of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry’s Disclosure UK database 2015 and 2016 cohorts. BMJ Open 8:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/8/10/e023094.full.pdf (accessed 8 Nov 2019).
  3. 3.↵
    1. Ozieranski P,
    2. Rickard E,
    3. Mulinari S
    (2019) Exposing drug industry funding of UK patient organisations. BMJ 365:DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1806.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 69 (689)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 69, Issue 689
December 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bad Medicine: Nofreelunch
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Bad Medicine: Nofreelunch
Des Spence
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (689): 620. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X706997

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Bad Medicine: Nofreelunch
Des Spence
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (689): 620. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X706997
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Being philosophical when it’s complicated
  • Sleepwalking into a two-tiered healthcare system
  • Books: 36 Hours
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242