Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Oral Presentations

A qualitative evaluation of a Clinical Effectiveness Scheme in London

Guy Shefer and Maria Kordowicz
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (suppl 1): bjgp19X703241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X703241
Guy Shefer
King’s College London Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: guy.1.shefer@kcl.ac.uk
Maria Kordowicz
King’s College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

Background Clinical Effectiveness Southwark (CES) is a London-based primary care Quality Improvement (QI) scheme with the aim of improving clinical quality across local general practice. In order to improve patient outcomes in selected long-term conditions, a team of four GPs, working with other professionals, developed condition-based short guides, clinical templates, and other educational interventions.

Aim A mixed methods evaluation of the processes and impact of CES in its implementation and operation phases.

Method In the first year, qualitative methods were used which included 18 interviews, one focus group and observation of 53 meetings, educational events and teleconferences. The data were analysed thematically using NVivo software. The result of surveys with local clinicians about their use of CES guides are reported.

Results In the first year since formation, CES produced seven clinical guides and three templates. Six months after the launch of the first three guides, 57% of the survey responders reported using at least one guide in their practice. Electronic templates took longer than expected to develop. The existence of other (typically online) guidelines and a wish for even shorter, more concise, guides were among the reasons reported by those who did not use the guides on a regular basis.

Conclusion There is a demand from GPs and nurses for high quality, well-written, short, easy to use, local guides for various conditions.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2019
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 69 (suppl 1)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 69, Issue suppl 1
June 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A qualitative evaluation of a Clinical Effectiveness Scheme in London
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A qualitative evaluation of a Clinical Effectiveness Scheme in London
Guy Shefer, Maria Kordowicz
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (suppl 1): bjgp19X703241. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X703241

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
A qualitative evaluation of a Clinical Effectiveness Scheme in London
Guy Shefer, Maria Kordowicz
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (suppl 1): bjgp19X703241. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X703241
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters

More in this TOC Section

  • GPs’ experience of safeguarding in care homes: what do they see and what do they do?
  • If GPs who teach medical students were assisted to be good role models might this influence the medical career the students choose?
  • Preventative health screening community events, a mechanism to target minority ethnic populations in improving primary care utilisation to improve health outcomes
Show more Oral Presentations

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242