Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Poster presentations

What are the opportunities for cancer care and related research in primary care? A qualitative study of the views of patients, carers, and practice staff

Joseph Clark, Elvis Amoakwa, John Blenkinsopp, Florence Reedy and Miriam Johnson
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (suppl 1): bjgp19X703505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X703505
Joseph Clark
Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: joseph.clark@hyms.ac.uk
Elvis Amoakwa
Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Blenkinsopp
University of Northumbria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Florence Reedy
University of Hull
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miriam Johnson
Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

Background Research to identify the role of primary care in cancer care is important. However, trials in primary care are difficult.

Aim To understand how patients, families, and primary care clinicians view their role in cancer care and identify opportunities for cancer primary care research.

Method Qualitative study embedded within a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of a primary care based needs assessment intervention. The Supportive Cancer Needs Survey (SCNS) was the main outcome. In-depth interviews with patients/carers and focus groups with primary care staff explored views on cancer care and trial participation. Data were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically by three independent researchers.

Results Fifteen cancer patients and three carers were interviewed and four focus groups (n = 11) were conducted. Three themes were generated satisfaction with current care; key time-points for improved cancer care; and information and research. Satisfaction with current care among patients was high in spite of 72% reporting at least one moderate-high unmet need at baseline. Most patients undergoing cancer treatment were unsure when to access primary care. Patients and carers highly valued proactive contact from their practice following diagnosis though this was uncommon. Post-oncology discharge was a key time-point for information needs and support for patients. Patients were reluctant to consider palliative care in spite of palliative care needs. Some felt therapeutic benefit from completing study measures.

Conclusion Patients are satisfied with cancer primary care despite unmet needs. Palliative care is poorly understood by many who may benefit. Research participation may benefit some patients.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2019
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 69 (suppl 1)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 69, Issue suppl 1
June 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
What are the opportunities for cancer care and related research in primary care? A qualitative study of the views of patients, carers, and practice staff
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
What are the opportunities for cancer care and related research in primary care? A qualitative study of the views of patients, carers, and practice staff
Joseph Clark, Elvis Amoakwa, John Blenkinsopp, Florence Reedy, Miriam Johnson
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (suppl 1): bjgp19X703505. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X703505

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
What are the opportunities for cancer care and related research in primary care? A qualitative study of the views of patients, carers, and practice staff
Joseph Clark, Elvis Amoakwa, John Blenkinsopp, Florence Reedy, Miriam Johnson
British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69 (suppl 1): bjgp19X703505. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X703505
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluation of a novel anxiety and trauma intervention at the Edinburgh Fringe
  • Antibiotic resistance of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and ESBL prevalence in general practice patients over 10 years
  • Evaluating the relational continuity of care of four GP practices, one of which uses personalised lists
Show more Poster presentations

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242