Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Debrief: The political doctor

Euan Lawson
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (690): 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X707489
Euan Lawson
. Email:
Roles: Deputy Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: euan@euanlawson.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

Objective or idiotic

Why are so many doctors idiots? I don’t mean in the modern sense of the word describing the foolish and unwise but from the original meaning, idiotes. The Greek word used in Athenian democracy described those who chose to avoid the daily politics of the square and public life. Over the years the word has taken on a pejorative meaning, though there was always a hint of Greek reproach for those too selfish to engage. I sense that doctors have been groomed to think of medicine as apolitical, maybe in part due to the Popperian principles of objectivity. A steady erosion of respect in political discourse has scarcely helped.

We’ve let studied neutrality bleed into our entire profession and doctors often seem to believe that we should be aloof, above politics. And yet, Christopher Hitchens described how, on the left at least, many middle-class doctors were drawn to socialism through their: ‘Experience of doctors in the slums: forced to confront the raw injustice and maldistribution that dominated the life and death question of healthcare.’ 1

How did we become so supine? We are too often spectators, if we see at all, gazing passively on the slow-motion car crash of austerity.

Politics with a small p

It is hard with a general election hangover still throbbing in our temples but we need to embrace politics. I don’t mean, at least not necessarily, party politics. The party political system bundles up policies and the individual plans can’t be disaggregated. Instead, think of the dozens of smaller niche topics upon which we can exercise political pressure. As doctors we can excel at this lower-case politics, the local and the targeted. Think of it as the micro-political. It might be supporting a local foodbank, advocating for better services for a vulnerable group, or just tweaking the practice protocols to improve accessibility. By all means get involved in the big-picture politics — but it’s the community level that needs us.

And the NHS needs us to exercise our collective political will too. Unknown to many, Enoch Powell was Minister of Health from 1960 for just over 3 years and wrote a slim volume, A New Look at Medicine and Politics.2 It’s a remarkable book and much of it remains eerily pertinent.

Many think the best policy for the NHS would be for it to be removed from politics altogether. Powell puts a persuasive case that it is almost impossible to disentangle the NHS from politics. In which case, if we want to support the NHS, we’ve no choice but to enter the political fray.

Shouting down the snollygosters

If we don’t do it who will? The BMA does good work but the recent damning report on sexism in the BMA from Daphne Romney, QC, recommended, inter alia, that ‘Shouting is completely unacceptable in any place of work.’ 3

They had to be told that? The Local Medical Committees are trying but they are hardly a shining political beacon, more of a raging bin fire, with their lamentable conference motion to hand back home visits and throw the most vulnerable under the bus.

We each have the tools for these micro-political battles. We know how to communicate and let’s utilise one of our best weapons: evidence. We understand evidence should always trump ideology and we should demand it, insist on it, resist when it is absent.

This month’s Debrief exists in a curious political limbo: the general election snuggles, clutching some seasonal eggnog, between writing and publication. I’ll leave you with an aside and a new political word to fill this odd lacuna: snollygoster.

A helpful editor in 1895 used this definition: ‘… a fellow who wants office, regardless of party, platform or principles, and who, whenever he wins, gets there by the sheer force of monumental talknophical assumnacy.’4

By now you will know if a snollygoster got in. It doesn’t matter; we can still pursue our politics. And, whatever the future holds, let’s not be the idiots.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2020

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Hitchens C
    (2016) And yet … essays. (Atlantic Books, London).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Powell JE
    (March 11, 1966) A new look at medicine and politics (Socialist Health Association), https://www.sochealth.co.uk/national-health-service/healthcare-generally/history-of-healthcare/a-new-look-at-medicine-and-politics/ (accessed 5 Dec 2019).
  3. 3.↵
    1. Romney D
    (2019) Report into sexism at the BMA, https://www.bma.org.uk/-/media/files/pdfs/aboutthebma/equalityandinclusion/bma-daphne-romney-qc-report-oct-19.pdf (accessed 5 Dec 2019).
  4. 4.↵
    1. Snollygoster
    (1999) World Wide Words. http://www.worldwidewords.org/weirdwords/ww-sno1.htm (accessed 5 Dec 2019).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 70 (690)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 70, Issue 690
January 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Debrief: The political doctor
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Debrief: The political doctor
Euan Lawson
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (690): 23. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X707489

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Debrief: The political doctor
Euan Lawson
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (690): 23. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X707489
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Objective or idiotic
    • Politics with a small p
    • Shouting down the snollygosters
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • A groundhog century? Collings and the crisis in general practice
  • How much does a GP cost?
  • Opening up the black boxes of our primary care systems
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242