Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Advertisement
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

Our experience of employing a musculoskeletal practitioner in general practice

Jack Leach and Kurt Lievesley
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (692): 110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X708413
Jack Leach
Edgworth Medical Practice, Bolton. Email:
Roles: GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jack.m.leach@gmail.com
Kurt Lievesley
Edgworth Medical Practice, Bolton.
Roles: Physiotherapist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

We read with interest about physiotherapists as an alternative to GPs.1 We recognised that the management of musculoskeletal (MSK) problems could be improved in our practice. In 2015, we employed an MSK practitioner to work across three practices (total patient population 26 000). It needed to be cost-effective compared with a GP. The salary of an MSK practitioner is around half that of a GP’s. The MSK practitioner should see at least half the number of patients that a GP sees. These patients should not also see a GP for the same problem. The practitioner should provide direct treatment and reduce referrals to physiotherapy and orthopaedics. We evaluated whether our MSK practitioner achieved this and we believe he did.

In March, April, and May 2018 the practitioner saw 789 patients in 58 4-hour sessions, with an average of 13 patients per session. The average number of visits were 1.25. Sixty-two patients were referred to secondary care (8.2%) and 48 to physiotherapy (6.3%).

An audit of 25 peripheral joint injections found 16 carried out by the MSK practitioner and nine by a GP. There were no complications recorded on follow-up.

A 2019 patient satisfaction survey found that 80% of patients preferred seeing the MSK practitioner to the GP or advanced nurse practitioner. Ninety-five per cent said they would see the practitioner again and recommend him to family and friends.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2020

REFERENCE

  1. 1.↵
    1. Downie F,
    2. McRitchie C,
    3. Monteith W,
    4. Turner H
    (2019) Br J Gen Pract, Physiotherapist as an alternative to a GP for musculoskeletal conditions: a 2-year service evaluation of UK primary care data. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X702245.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 70 (692)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 70, Issue 692
March 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Our experience of employing a musculoskeletal practitioner in general practice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Our experience of employing a musculoskeletal practitioner in general practice
Jack Leach, Kurt Lievesley
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (692): 110. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X708413

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Our experience of employing a musculoskeletal practitioner in general practice
Jack Leach, Kurt Lievesley
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (692): 110. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X708413
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCE
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Two-tiered medicine: the increasing disparity in medical care in the UK
  • MRCGP Recorded Consultation Assessment — the hidden fourth construct
  • Prostate-specific antigen testing and opportunistic prostate cancer screening — CAP intervention
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242