Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Debate & Analysis

Would primary care paediatricians improve UK child health outcomes? Yes

Timothy Peter Newson
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (693): 195-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X709229
Timothy Peter Newson
Director of Undergraduate Medical Education, and Clinical Lead, Kent and Canterbury Hospital, East Kent Hospitals NHS Foundation University Trust, Canterbury.
Roles: Consultant Paediatrician with a special interest in Respiratory Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Present child health outcomes

We are failing our children and young people in the UK. Earlier this year, research showed that UK childhood mortality is higher than in a comparable group of wealthy countries for common infections and multiple non-communicable diseases.1

The UK, for example, has the highest rate of childhood asthma deaths in Europe due to poor chronic disease management despite good national guidelines.2–5 Delays in diagnosis of Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy in the UK are among the longest in Europe, being only marginally better than in the 1970s, mainly due to lack of recognition of delayed motor development in primary care.6,7 Against this backdrop, my own recent experience of a late referral of a child now diagnosed with a brain tumour, who had been symptomatic with red-flag signs for 3 months despite seeking consultation on multiple occasions in primary care, has made me reflect that there is a systemic problem with health care for children in this country.

Healthcare system in the UK versus Europe

How does our healthcare system for children and young people differ from other countries with equivalent wealth but better health outcomes? The answer may well be that children in Europe see primary care paediatricians trained in primary care paediatrics (with a competency-based curriculum) and not GPs, who are generalists with variable training and experience in paediatrics.8

In the UK, when a child is unwell the first interaction with our health service is mainly via a GP who may have no formal training in paediatrics or minimal exposure of just 4 months in a hospital paediatric setting, which is too short.9 Exposure to children will occur during GP training attachments but further reflective learning is reliant on GP trainers who will vary in paediatric experience and expertise. Once in practice a GP’s paediatric knowledge and experience has to compete with the many demands in primary care, for example, mental health issues, adult chronic diseases, and demands of an ageing population. How can a GP with all of these demands of challenging patient groups be up to date with a plethora of guidelines in all areas of medicine?

GP training and consultation time

Present GP training in paediatrics means that many GPs inevitably lack the skills, up-to-date knowledge, and experience to adequately assess and treat many of the common problems in children presenting to primary care.9 This issue is also compounded by the typically short consultation times (average 10 minutes in the UK versus 22.5 minutes in Sweden), which is known to be associated with poorer health outcomes. Short consultations may just focus on detecting gross disease and become little more than a ‘triage and issue of a prescription’.10 In paediatrics it is especially important that enough time is allowed to thoroughly explore concerns of parents, children, and young people, and to examine the patient. The consultation, if good and thorough, can be therapeutic, giving both children and parents/carers confidence in the clinical decision-making process. Without attention to carrying out an adequate consultation the patient’s or parents’ faith in clinical decisions is undermined, often leading to a demand for secondary care referral or search for further healthcare opinions. Our system has unrealistic expectations of what can be achieved during a short consultation; this is exemplified by the British Medical Journal ’s 10-minute consultation series. A model assessment of the poorly controlled adolescent with asthma was expected to be completed in 10 minutes but in practice would take at least 30 minutes.11,12

Primary care paediatricians could revolutionise the workforce in child health

Primary care paediatricians would be a popular option for many doctors who enjoy paediatrics and child health but who do not want to pursue the long programme (8 years) of hospital-based training to become a paediatrician. I have met many excellent paediatric trainees who have left paediatrics, and who have expressed that they would have stayed in paediatrics if this career option with a shorter training period (2–3 years) was available. The recent Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) 2019 meeting had sessions on workforce issues, such as rota gaps, lack of doctors wanting to train in paediatrics, and burnout among trainee and consultant paediatricians. This is worrying for the future workforce, and radical change is needed to address these issues and improve the outlook for child health and paediatricians. One solution is to invest in a new type of primary care paediatrician (akin to our European neighbours) who can work within primary care to improve the standard and quality of care given to children and young people with common conditions such as asthma. Liaison of these paediatricians with primary care colleagues and secondary care paediatric departments could strengthen care pathways, easing the burden on hospital emergency departments.

Call to arms

We as paediatricians need to do something urgently and differently to address the shocking outcomes for children in the UK. Primary care paediatricians, I believe, are the way forward. I hope the Presidents of the RCPCH and Royal College of General Practitioners can work together to agree a curriculum and training schedule, and make primary care paediatric posts available throughout the UK.

Notes

Provenance

Freely submitted; not externally peer reviewed.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2020

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ward JL,
    2. Wolfe I,
    3. Viner RM
    Cause specific child and young person mortality in the UK and EU15 countriesArch Dis Child2019104Suppl24
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Levy ML,
    2. Fleming L,
    3. Warner JO,
    4. Bush A
    Paediatric asthma care in UK: fragmented and fatally fallibleBr J Gen Pract2019https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X704933.
  3. 3.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    Clinical knowledge summaries: asthma2019cks.nice.org.uk/asthma (accessed 27 Jan 2020).
  4. 4.
    1. British Thoracic Society, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network
    SIGN158 British guideline on the management of asthma: a national clinical guideline2019https://www.brit-thoracic.org.uk/quality-improvement/guidelines/asthma (accessed 27 Jan 2020).
  5. 5.↵
    1. Royal College of Physicians
    National review of asthma deaths2014www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/national-review-asthma-deaths (accessed 27 Jan 2020).
  6. 6.↵
    1. Van Ruiten HJ,
    2. Straub V,
    3. Bushby K,
    4. et al.
    Improving recognition of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a retrospective case note reviewArch Dis Child2014991210741077
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
    Recognising neuromuscular disorders — online learninghttps://www.rcpch.ac.uk/resources/recognising-neuromuscular-disorders-online-learning (accessed 28 Jan 2020).
  8. 8.↵
    1. Newson T
    Curriculum change in general practitioner paediatric training attachment: views from the coalface of professional practiceAMEE 2010 abstracts201049https://amee.org/getattachment/Conferences/AMEE-Past-Conferences/AMEE-Conference-2010/AMEE-2010-Abstract-book.pdf (accessed 28 Jan 2020).
  9. 9.↵
    1. European Confederation of Primary Care Paediatricians
    Curriculum in primary care paediatrics2014https://www.ecpcp.eu/fileadmin/pdf_doc_ppt/Curriculum_in_Primary_Care_Paediatrics_4.12.2014.pdf (accessed 28 Jan 2020).
  10. 10.↵
    1. Johnson E
    Primary care consultations last less than 5 minutes for half the world’s population2017https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2017/11/08/primary-care-consultations-last-less-than-5-minutes-for-half-the-worlds-population (accessed 28 Jan 2020).
  11. 11.↵
    1. Connett GJ,
    2. Connett LA,
    3. Thomas M
    Determining the reasons for poorly controlled asthma in an adolescentBMJ2019364I75
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Syme D
    Rapid response. Re: Determining the reasons for poorly controlled asthma in an adolescent2019https://www.bmj.com/content/364/bmj.l75/rapid-responses (accessed 5 Feb 2020).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 70 (693)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 70, Issue 693
April 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Would primary care paediatricians improve UK child health outcomes? Yes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Would primary care paediatricians improve UK child health outcomes? Yes
Timothy Peter Newson
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (693): 195-196. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X709229

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Would primary care paediatricians improve UK child health outcomes? Yes
Timothy Peter Newson
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (693): 195-196. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X709229
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Present child health outcomes
    • Healthcare system in the UK versus Europe
    • GP training and consultation time
    • Primary care paediatricians could revolutionise the workforce in child health
    • Call to arms
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • SAFER diagnosis: a teaching system to help reduce diagnostic errors in primary care
  • An Australian reflects on the Collings report 70 years on
  • GP home visits: essential patient care or disposable relic?
Show more Debate & Analysis

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242