The Wass report: moving forward 3 years on

John Gillies; Maggie Bartlett; Jon Dowell; Karen Fairhurst; Ken Lawton; Lindsey Pope; Rebecca Walmsley

doi:10.3399/bjgp20X709493

The editorial by Lawson and Kumar¹ on the lack of progress in implementing the recommendations of the 2016 Wass report is timely and welcome.² We would like to highlight the response in Scotland. In early 2018, Scottish Government Health Workforce Directorate established a short-life working group on increasing undergraduate medical education in primary care. The membership comprised senior civil servants from Health Workforce, Primary Care and Health and Care Analysis, NHS Education Scotland, Scottish Funding Council, Undergraduate Deans, RCGP Scotland, Scottish GPs’ Committee of the BMA, NHS Scotland Health Boards, medical students, and all GP Heads of Teaching (HoT) or equivalent in Scottish medical schools. This group was supported by an NHS Education Scotland group examining Additional Cost of Teaching (ACT) in primary care in Scotland.

The issue of funding for practices, as discussed in the editorial, was crucial. The methodology of Rosenthal et al³ was validated in Scottish practices, and a median figure of 85 GBP per student per session was identified.

The final report — Undergraduate Medical Education in Scotland: Enabling More General Practice Based Teaching — comprised 10 recommendations covering capital investment, improving digital access and connectivity, a rise in the tariff as set put above, growing the GP educator workforce, strengthening the leadership role of GP HoTs, and monitoring and research, and was published in October 2019.⁴ It was endorsed by the Board for Academic Medicine and supported by Ms Jeane Freeman, Cabinet Secretary for Health.⁵ Support includes the increase in funding for practices, which starts in April 2020.

This is an important step forward in Scotland. However, delivering on Professor Val Wass’s report was always going to be challenging, and much remains to be done in Scotland and elsewhere. Evaluating the impact and monitoring the delivery of all 10 Scottish recommendations is under discussion but, of course, will have to await the resolution of the COVID-19 emergency.

REFERENCES

1.↵
1. Lawson E,
2. Kumar S
The Wass report: moving forward 3 years onBr J Gen Pract2020https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X708953.
2.↵
1. Wass VJ,
2. Gregory S,
3. Petty-Saphon K
By choice — not by chance: supporting medical students towards future careers in general practice2016https://www.hee.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/documents/By%20choice%20-%20not%20by%20chance.pdf (accessed 16 Apr 2020).
3.↵
1. Rosenthal J,
2. McKinley RK,
3. Smyth C,
4. Campbell JL
The real costs of teaching medical students in general practice: a cost-collection survey of teaching practices across EnglandBr J Gen Pract2020https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X706553.
4.↵
Scottish GovernmentUndergraduate medical education in Scotland: enabling more general practice based teaching2019https://www.gov.scot/publications/undergraduate-medical-education-scotland-enabling-more-general-practice-based-teaching/pages/11 (accessed 16 Apr 2020).
5.↵
Scottish GovernmentGrowing the next generation of GPs2019https://www.gov.scot/news/growing-the-next-generation-of-gps (accessed 16 April 2020)