Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editorials

Five principles for pandemic preparedness: lessons from the Australian COVID-19 primary care response

Michael R Kidd
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (696): 316-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X710765
Michael R Kidd
Australian Government Department of Health, Australia; Professor of Primary Care Reform, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia; Adjunct Professor, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Emeritus Director, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre on Family Medicine and Primary Care, Canada; Professorial Fellow, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Honorary Professor of Global Primary Care, Southgate Institute for Health, Society and Equity, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Roles: Principal Medical Advisor and Deputy Chief Medical Officer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

INTRODUCTION

The Australian Health Sector Emergency Response Plan for Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19)1 was activated on 27 February 2020, in response to the evolving global crisis. The national COVID-19 primary care response was then initiated.2 The approach took a broad view of the primary healthcare sector and included general practice, community nursing and allied health, mental health, aged care, disability care, home care, and Indigenous health workers. The primary care response included specific strategies to support Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health services, palliative care services, and services for people with disability.3–5 There was also close alignment with strategies developed for aged care services, both in the home and in residential aged care facilities, recognising the role played by general practice and other primary care providers in these services. The primary care response was developed in partnership with representatives of general practice and the wider primary healthcare sector, and continued to be refined through regular engagement with over 30 peak national organisations.

Australia’s primary care response to COVID-19 acknowledged the strength of the nation’s primary healthcare system and assigned key roles to general practice and the wider primary healthcare sector in responding to the pandemic, based on the essential first contact role of primary care and lessons drawn from previous epidemics and pandemics.6–8 It also placed general practice expertise within the national planning and decision-making processes alongside expertise in public health, infectious diseases, epidemiology, nursing, and mental health.

Australia’s national COVID-19 primary care response is based on a set of principles,2 which form a framework for managing both the current crisis and for future national and international responses to health emergencies, building on the contributions of general practice and primary care in the:

  1. Protection of vulnerable people.

  2. Provision of treatment and support services to affected people.

  3. Continuity of regular healthcare services for the whole population.

  4. Protection and support of primary healthcare workers and primary care services.

  5. Provision of mental health services to the community and the primary healthcare workforce.

Protection of vulnerable people

It is recognised that the members of the community most vulnerable to the effects of COVID-19 are those normally being cared for by GPs and other primary healthcare providers.9,10 People at particular risk from COVID-19 include those who are aged over 70 years, people who are immunocompromised or with specific chronic medical conditions, and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people over 50 years of age with chronic conditions. Dedicated funding for the provision of telehealth consultations was made available to ensure both vulnerable patients and vulnerable healthcare providers were protected from the start of the pandemic.11

In addition, some population groups, including older people living in residential care settings and residents of remote indigenous communities, were identified as vulnerable to COVID-19, and specific strategies were implemented including remote area travel restrictions, targeted COVID-19 point-of-care testing, and pandemic guidance for aged care settings.

Provision of treatment and support services to affected people

As the majority of people infected with COVID-19 experience mild to moderate symptoms and do not require hospitalisation, ongoing medical care can be provided by general practice and other primary care services. A core component of pandemic planning should be facilitating testing and the effective management in community settings of people with symptoms, or a diagnosis of infection, or contacts of those with a diagnosis, and who do not require hospitalisation.

As part of the Australian response, over 130 general practice-led respiratory clinics were established in metropolitan and rural areas nationwide to assess, test, and manage people with mild to moderate symptoms of respiratory tract infection, and divert people with potential infection away from regular general practice clinics and hospital emergency departments.12 These clinics complemented acute services being provided by public hospital fever clinics and have been supported by a national call centre and online symptom checker, which provided advice for individuals with health concerns. The establishment of the national network of clinics was coordinated with the nation’s 31 primary health networks.

Continuity of regular healthcare services for the whole population

Evidence from past epidemics and pandemics demonstrates the added risk to people’s health when the population stops attending healthcare services due to concerns about the risk of infection.7,9,13 It is essential to retain the functional capability of general practices and the wider primary healthcare system to ensure the continued provision of regular primary care services to the whole community for the assessment and management of acute conditions, chronic conditions, mental health conditions, and preventive health measures.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Australian government funded telehealth services for the whole of the population to ensure continued access to general practice and other health services,14 while recognising the financial impact of widespread job losses related to measures required to manage the pandemic.

Protection and support of primary healthcare workers and primary care services

It is essential that healthcare workers in general practices and other primary care settings are protected from infection risk during a pandemic, just as hospital staff are protected.15 Primary healthcare workers in Australia, as elsewhere in the world, were very concerned about the availability of personal protective equipment (PPE), which was in limited supply globally at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Australian government secured supplies and distributed PPE through the primary health networks to general practices, community pharmacies, and other primary healthcare providers.

The Australian government also provided infrastructure payments to ensure business continuity and the viability of the nation’s general practices, especially to support the ongoing employment of members of the primary care teams in general practices.14

Provision of mental health to the community and the primary healthcare workforce

General practices and other primary healthcare services play a critical role in the provision of mental health services. The need for these services has been exacerbated by the impacts of job losses and business closures, and the impact of isolation and quarantine measures on many members of the population. The mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers, including those working in primary care, has also been significant.

Telehealth has been utilised to provide mental health consultations, and specific resources have been made available for frontline healthcare workers,16 as well as for the general population.17

CONCLUSION

In countries like the UK and Australia, a strong network of general practices forms the essential basis of the national healthcare system. When the community experiences a national health emergency, as has been seen with the COVID-19 pandemic, general practice and other elements of the nation’s primary care services must be supported to ensure optimal continuity of health care for the population, as well as providing an essential component of the health system’s responses to the emergency.

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges the work of Sally Hall, Jane Desborough, and all members of the Australian Government Department of Health COVID-19 Primary Care Response Group.

Notes

Provenance

Commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

Competing interests

Michael R Kidd is employed by the Australian Government Department of Health.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2020

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Australian Government Department of Health
    Australian Health Sector Emergency Response Plan for Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19)2020https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/australian-health-sector-emergency-response-plan-for-novel-coronavirus-covid-19 (accessed 8 Jun 2020).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Kidd M
    Australia’s primary care COVID-19 responseAust J Gen Pract2020doi:10.31128/AJGP-COVID-02
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Australian Government Department of Health
    Management Plan for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Populations2020https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/management-plan-for-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-populations (accessed 8 Jun 2020).
  4. 4.
    1. Australian Government Department of Health
    Management and Operational Plan for People with Disability2020https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/management-and-operational-plan-for-people-with-disability (accessed 8 Jun 2020).
  5. 5.↵
    1. Desborough J,
    2. Hall SL,
    3. de Toca L,
    4. et al.
    Australia’s national COVID-19 primary care responseMed J Aust2020https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2020/australias-national-covid-19-primary-care-response (accessed 8 Jun 2020).
  6. 6.↵
    1. Collins N,
    2. Litt J,
    3. Moore M,
    4. et al.
    General practice: professional preparation for a pandemicMed J Aust2006185S10S66S69
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Health Canada
    Learning from SARS: renewal of public health in Canada, a report of the National Advisory Committee on SARS and Public Health2003https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/phac-aspc/migration/phac-aspc/publicat/sars-sras/pdf/sars-e.pdf (accessed 8 Jun 2020).
  8. 8.↵
    1. Ontario College of Family Physicians
    The mushroom syndrome: SARS and family medicine2003http://www.archives.gov.on.ca/en/e_records/sars/hearings/01Mon.pdf/Mon_2_30_The_Ontario_College_of_Family_Physicians.pdf (accessed 8 Jun 2020).
  9. 9.↵
    1. Runkle JD,
    2. Brock-Martin A,
    3. Karmaus W,
    4. Svendsen ER
    Secondary surge capacity: a framework for understanding long-term access to primary care for medically vulnerable populations in disaster recoveryAm J Public Health201210212e24e32
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Quinn SC,
    2. Kumar S
    Health inequalities and infectious disease epidemics: a challenge for global health securityBiosecur Bioterror2014125263273
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Australian Government Department of Health
    COVID-19 temporary MBS telehealth services2020http://www.mbsonline.gov.au/internet/mbsonline/publishing.nsf/Content/Factsheet-TempBB (accessed 8 Jun 2020).
  12. 12.↵
    1. Australian Government Department of Health
    Coronavirus (COVID-19) GP respiratory clinics2020https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/coronavirus-covid-19-gp-respiratory-clinics (accessed 8 Jun 2020).
  13. 13.↵
    1. Scott V,
    2. Crawford-Browne S,
    3. Sanders D
    Critiquing the response to the ebola epidemic through a primary health care approachBMC Public Health201616410
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Hunt G,
    2. Kidd M
    COVID-19: whole of population telehealth for patients, general practice, primary care and other medical ervices2020https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/media/covid-19-whole-of-population-telehealth-for-patients-general-practice-primary-care-and-other-medical-services (accessed 8 Jun 2020).
  15. 15.↵
    1. McCarthy M,
    2. Rivolta G
    COVID-19: If we can’t protect our workers, we can’t protect our patientsThe BMJ Opinion202017Aprhttps://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/04/17/covid-19-if-we-cant-protect-our-workers-we-cant-protect-our-patients (accessed 8 Jun 2020).
  16. 16.↵
    1. Black Dog Institute
    TEN — The Essential Network for health professionals2020https://www.blackdoginstitute.org.au/ten (accessed 8 Jun 2020).
  17. 17.↵
    1. Hunt G
    Free coronavirus wellbeing support service2020https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/media/free-coronavirus-wellbeing-support-service (accessed 8 Jun 2020).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 70 (696)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 70, Issue 696
July 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Five principles for pandemic preparedness: lessons from the Australian COVID-19 primary care response
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Five principles for pandemic preparedness: lessons from the Australian COVID-19 primary care response
Michael R Kidd
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (696): 316-317. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X710765

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Five principles for pandemic preparedness: lessons from the Australian COVID-19 primary care response
Michael R Kidd
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (696): 316-317. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X710765
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • INTRODUCTION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Socioeconomic deprivation and post-stroke care in the community
  • Advocating for patients through laboratory tests: what do GPs’ use of blood tests for suspected cancer tell us?
  • Diagnosis of prostate cancer in primary care: navigating updated clinical guidance
Show more Editorials

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242