Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

Reduction in face-to-face GP consultations

Denis Pereira Gray, Kate Sidaway-Lee, Alex Harding and Philip Evans
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (696): 328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X710849
Denis Pereira Gray
Exeter. Email:
Roles: St Leonard’s Research Practice
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: denis.pereiragray@btinternet.com
Kate Sidaway-Lee
St Leonard’s Research Practice, Exeter.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex Harding
St Leonard’s Research Practice, Exeter.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip Evans
St Leonard’s Research Practice, Exeter.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The COVID-19 pandemic has produced the biggest change in consultation patterns in British general practice for at least 200 years. The St Leonard’s Practice in Exeter has for years recorded and analysed consultation data.1,2

After NHS guidance to reduce face-to-face consultations, there was an immediate reduction. During March the number of face-to-face consultations fell from a mean of 52.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 35.2 to 67.1) per weekday in the 2 weeks before the change to a mean of 3.9 (95% CI = 1.9 to 5.9) for the second half of the month, that is, a 92.5% decrease (P<0.001). The number of telephone consultations increased on average by 85.6% (P = 0.0013) in the same time period, with a mean of 50.1 (95% CI = 40.7 to 57.5) per weekday in the first two weeks of March to a mean of 93.0 (95% CI = 70.5 to 115.5) in the final weeks of the month.

We have produced a table showing appointments per 100 patients by patient age group, before and after (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Consultations per 100 registered patient by patient age group and consultation type before and after instigation of lockdown

The practice also began using eConsults and the use of these by age groups is shown on the right-hand side of the table with proportionately more use of eConsults by patients aged <65.

Patients in the lowest two national deciles of the Index of Multiple Deprivation numbered 1324 (14% of the list) and their consultations formed 17.2% of all consultations in the first half of the month and 16.8% afterwards, showing no significant difference (P = 0.8).

This big reduction in face-to-face consultations as a result of the pandemic will have occurred in many other practices. We hope this quantification will assist future planning.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2020

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Pereira Gray DJ
    The key to personal careJ R Coll Gen Pract197929208666678
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Sidaway-Lee K,
    2. Pereira Gray D,
    3. Evans P
    A method for measuring of continuity of care in day-today general practice: a quantitative analysis of appointment dataBr J Gen Pract2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X701813.
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 70 (696)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 70, Issue 696
July 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reduction in face-to-face GP consultations
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Reduction in face-to-face GP consultations
Denis Pereira Gray, Kate Sidaway-Lee, Alex Harding, Philip Evans
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (696): 328. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X710849

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Reduction in face-to-face GP consultations
Denis Pereira Gray, Kate Sidaway-Lee, Alex Harding, Philip Evans
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (696): 328. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X710849
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • It’s time to look again at GP funding
  • Inequalities in CKD management can be overcome
  • Changes in patient experience associated with growth and collaboration in general practice
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242