Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research

A real-time measurement of general practice workload in the Republic of Ireland: a prospective study

Brendan Crosbie, Michael Edmund O’Callaghan, Stuart O’Flanagan, David Brennan, Gavin Keane and William Behan
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (696): e489-e496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X710429
Brendan Crosbie
Castle Street Surgery, Roscommon.
MRCPI, MICGP, GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Edmund O’Callaghan
Department of General Practice, University of Limerick, Limerick.
BMBS, BEng, MSc, MICGP, GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stuart O’Flanagan
Aranleigh Health Centre, Rathfarnham, Dublin.
MICGP, MFSEM, GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Brennan
Ballyhale Health Centre, Ballyhale, Kilkenny.
MICGP, GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gavin Keane
Morehampton Clinic, Dublin.
MICGP, GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William Behan
Trinity College Dublin GP Training Scheme, Dublin.
GP Trainer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Flow chart demonstrating sample size following the application of exclusion criteria.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Boxplot demonstrating the breakdown of daily activity according to work-type categories for the total population. CME = Continuous Medical Education.

Tables

  • Figures
  • How this fits in

    GP workload is an issue of increasing concern. This study attempted to accurately measure this workload among GPs in the Republic of Ireland (RoI). The use of a real-time recording method aims to address the limitations of survey-based approaches for measuring workload activity. Data were recorded over a 6-week period with the results providing a comprehensive quantification of daily GP workload activity that, to the authors’ knowledge, has not been previously achieved elsewhere. The results have the potential to inform future planning and delivery of general practice in the RoI. This study also demonstrates an efficient and accurate method of capturing workload activity that could be employed in future measurements of workload.
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Characteristics of the sample population, N = 123

    CharacteristicPartner (%)Assistant (%)Registrar (%)Urban (%)Mixed (%)Rural (%)
    Sex
      Male44 (52.4)9 (50.0)7 (33.3)34 (47.2)11 (44.0)15 (57.7)
      Female40 (47.6)9 (50.0)14 (66.7)38 (52.8)14 (56.0)11 (42.3)
    Age, years
      <4516 (19.0)15 (83.3)21 (100)29 (40.3)9 (36.0)14 (53.8)
      45–5435 (41.7)3 (16.7)0 (0)23 (31.9)8 (32.0)7 (26.9)
      ≥5533 (39.3)0 (0)0 (0)20 (27.8)8 (32.0)5 (19.2)
    Location
      Urban47 (56.0)12 (66.7)13 (61.9)72 (58.5)——
      Mixed21 (25.0)2 (11.1)2 (9.5)—25 (20.3)—
      Rural16 (19.0)4 (22.2)6 (28.6)——26 (21.1)
    Role
      Partner84 (68.3)—————
      Assistant—18 (14.6)————
      Registrar——21 (17.1)———
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Time spent completing 10 sessions and the proportional time expenditure on different working activities

    DemographicNTotal time, mean hours, %Clinical consultation, hours (%)Clinical paperwork, hours (%)Telephone call, hours (%)Prescription, hours (%)House call, hours (%)CME/research, hours (%)Administrative work, hours (%)
    Total Sample12349.431.64 (64.0)8.36 (16.9)2.20 (4.5)1.73 (3.5)1.43 (2.9)1.52 (3.1)2.52 (5.1)
    Role
      Partner8450.831.77 (62.5)8.50 (16.7)2.39 (4.7)1.71 (3.4)1.63 (3.2)1.61 (3.2)3.21 (6.3)
      Assistant1847.533.97 (71.5)6.61 (13.9)1.51 (3.2)1.64 (3.5)1.36 (2.9)0.95 (2.0)1.47 (3.1)
      Registrar2145.429.13 (64.2)9.31 (20.5)2.02 (4.4)1.88 (4.1)0.71 (1.6)1.67 (3.7)0.68 (1.5)
    Location
      Urban7249.631.56 (63.6)8.95 (18.0)2.08 (4.2)1.82 (3.7)1.22 (2.5)1.30 (2.6)2.67 (5.4)
      Mixed2549.833.28 (66.8)7.12 (14.3)1.97 (4.0)1.57 (3.2)1.61 (3.2)1.90 (3.8)2.35 (4.7)
      Rural2648.530.29 (62.4)7.93 (16.3)2.73 (5.6)1.63 (3.4)1.87 (3.9)1.77 (3.6)2.29 (4.7)
    Age, years
      <455247.732.24 (67.6)7.91 (16.6)1.90 (4.0)1.48 (3.1)0.90 (1.9)1.30 (2.7)1.94 (4.1)
      45–543850.630.42 (60.1)8.78 (17.3)2.51 (5.0)2.07 (4.1)1.51 (3.0)1.95 (3.9)3.39 (6.7)
      ≥553350.832.11 (63.3)8.60 (16.9)2.31 (4.6)1.73 (3.4)2.18 (4.3)1.38 (2.7)2.45 (4.8)
    Sex
      Male6049.431.60 (64.0)7.53 (15.2)2.17 (4.4)1.65 (3.3)2.05 (4.1)1.66 (3.4)2.75 (5.6)
      Female6349.431.69 (64.1)9.16 (18.5)2.22 (4.5)1.81 (3.7)0.84 (1.7)1.39 (2.8)2.30 (4.7)
    • CME = Continuous Medical Education.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Recording start and finish times of the total number of days recorded

    DemographicNRecorded start time, %Recorded finishing time, %
    <9.00 am<8.00 am<7.00 am>5.00 pm>6.00 pm>7.00 pm>8.00 pm>9.00 pm>10.00 pm>11.00 pm
    Total Sample110952.610.51.972.733.818.77.97.05.13.8
    Role
      Partner81557.511.72.573.660.935.920.813.97.93.5
      Assistant13433.34.80.066.340.316.98.26.43.91.2
      Registrar16043.19.00.069.337.114.36.54.00.40.0
    Location
      Urban64249.711.31.571.854.230.717.610.85.62.2
      Mixed20952.17.42.673.554.128.311.88.63.82.4
      Rural25860.610.82.571.857.632.520.215.110.04.0
    Age, years
      <4534548.39.10.971.146.020.210.97.64.52.6
      45–5434256.515.23.673.460.039.922.315.28.33.1
      ≥5542253.77.41.471.960.332.618.612.06.52.5
    Sex
      Male57052.68.32.574.559.733.019.012.47.43.4
      Female53952.712.81.369.749.827.814.810.25.21.9

Supplementary Data

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Supplementary material is not copyedited or typeset, and is published as supplied by the author(s). The author(s) retain(s) responsibility for its accuracy.

  • bjgp20X710429_Suppl.pdf
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 70 (696)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 70, Issue 696
July 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A real-time measurement of general practice workload in the Republic of Ireland: a prospective study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A real-time measurement of general practice workload in the Republic of Ireland: a prospective study
Brendan Crosbie, Michael Edmund O’Callaghan, Stuart O’Flanagan, David Brennan, Gavin Keane, William Behan
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (696): e489-e496. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X710429

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A real-time measurement of general practice workload in the Republic of Ireland: a prospective study
Brendan Crosbie, Michael Edmund O’Callaghan, Stuart O’Flanagan, David Brennan, Gavin Keane, William Behan
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (696): e489-e496. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X710429
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHOD
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • computerised medical records systems
  • general practice
  • referral and consultation
  • planning techniques
  • real-time recording
  • workload

More in this TOC Section

  • Exploration of reasons for primary care testing (the Why Test study): a UK-wide audit using the Primary care Academic CollaboraTive
  • Uptake and adoption of the NHS App in England: an observational study
  • Impact of ACEIs and ARBs-related adverse drug reaction on patients’ clinical outcomes: a cohort study in UK primary care
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

Tweets by @BJGPjournal

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242