Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editorials

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in primary and community care during the COVID-19 pandemic

Kamlesh Khunti, Sebastian Straube, Anil Adisesh, Xin Hui S Chan, Amitava Banerjee and Trisha Greenhalgh
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (697): 374-375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X711797
Kamlesh Khunti
Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Roles: Professor of Primary Care Diabetes & Vascular Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sebastian Straube
Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Roles: Professor and Division Director
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anil Adisesh
Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto and St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Roles: Associate Professor and Division Director
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xin Hui S Chan
Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Roles: Clinical Research Fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amitava Banerjee
Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
Roles: Associate Professor in Clinical Data Science and Honorary Consultant Cardiologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Trisha Greenhalgh
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Roles: Professor of Primary Care Health Sciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), can be spread by droplets or aerosols, particularly through direct or close contact and aerosol generating procedures (AGPs).1 Supplies of personal protective equipment (PPE)2 are limited, raising uncertainties in clinical judgement about the balance between benefit (to the patient) and risk (to the healthcare worker) during medical procedures, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) undertaken without adequate protection during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lack of PPE has caused intense anxiety in view of the increased number of deaths in healthcare workers including in primary and community care.2

CPR can be a complex intervention comprising airway management, ventilation, chest compressions, drug therapy, and defibrillation.3 While the intubation component of CPR is almost universally classified as an AGP, there is controversy around the risk of chest compression (to the person performing it, and to other staff and bystanders).4

Risks to healthcare workers will vary depending on the setting where such individuals work (primary or community care versus hospital-based care); and whether the individual works in an environment where AGPs are performed. The key concern for healthcare professionals is based on the possibility of aerosol generation with chest compressions and the risks associated with close physical contact with the patient. In addition, others who aid in the CPR effort, such as in primary or community care settings, even if not performing chest compressions themselves, may be in close physical proximity so as to be exposed as bystanders. Confusion has arisen because of varied guidance on CPR in different regions. For example, healthcare staff in one UK region were told not to start chest compressions or ventilation in patients having a cardiac arrest if they had either confirmed or suspected COVID-19 unless staff were wearing full (that is, aerosol and droplet protective) PPE, including a respirator mask (FFP3 mask), full gown with long sleeves, gloves, and eye protection.5

Public Health England (PHE) have issued various guidance documents on PPE since January 2020.6 Initial guidance suggested that chest compressions and defibrillation were not AGPs and could be carried out without full PPE. New guidance published on 24 April again designated chest compressions as a non-AGP, but recommended that healthcare organisations may choose to advise their clinical staff to wear FFP3 respirators, gowns, eye protection, and gloves when performing chest compressions. However, the same guidance also strongly advised that there should not be potential delays in delivering this ‘life-saving intervention’.6

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) recently published a systematic review that aimed to identify the risk of potential transmission from chest compression, defibrillation, and CPR.4 Of the 11 studies included in that review, five were case reports (a very weak design) describing a total of nine healthcare workers who developed a serious respiratory disease after performing CPR on a patient with that disease. Three were simulation studies on manikins. Of the other three, two were retrospective cohort studies and one was a case–control study. The review rightly concludes, the quality of primary evidence was thus low or very low, and studies provided only indirect evidence with none directly reporting on transmission of SARS-CoV-2. The review recommended that absence of evidence should not be interpreted as providing evidence that chest compressions are non-aerosol generating.4

The PHE recommendation that chest compression is not an AGP is thus not evidence based. The recommendations in the PHE guidance also conflict with the majority of guidelines and position statements we have reviewed, which classify CPR as an AGP or possible AGP (systematic review in preparation; personal communication, S Straube, 2020). These include the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, and the Society of Critical Care Medicine.7,8 The latest World Health Organization (WHO) COVID-19 specific guidance classifies CPR as an AGP.1 Resuscitation Council UK has also recommended full PPE including FFP3 mask, full gown with long sleeves, gloves, and eye protection, as well as shoe protection for chest compressions.9 They have based their guidance on the WHO and the ILCOR guidance.1,4

The European Resuscitation Council further recommends full PPE prior to starting chest compressions even if this results in a brief delay that may be associated with increased mortality and morbidity.9 They highlighted that the safety of staff is paramount. This comment should be interpreted in the light of a case series of 136 COVID-19 patients who required CPR, of whom only 18 ever had return of spontaneous circulation; four survived for at least 30 days and only one patient achieved a favourable neurological outcome at 30 days.10 This extremely poor prognosis is because most cardiac arrests in COVID-19 are pre-terminal events secondary to respiratory failure or multiorgan failure.3

In conclusion, the potential for recovery of the patient needs to be carefully balanced with the significant risk to the healthcare worker. In view of the intense anxiety of healthcare workers and in the absence of definitive evidence, we strongly recommend applying the precautionary principle and support the use of full PPE before giving chest compressions during the pandemic.

Acknowledgments

Kamlesh Khunti is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands (ARC EM) and the NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Notes

Provenance

Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Competing interests

The authors have declared no competing interests

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2020

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. World Health Organization
    Modes of transmission of virus causing COVID-19: implications for IPC precaution recommendations2020https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/modes-of-transmission-of-virus-causing-covid-19-implications-for-ipc-precaution-recommendations (accessed 10 Jul 2020).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Majeed A,
    2. Molokhia M,
    3. Pankhania B,
    4. Asanati K
    Protecting the health of doctors during the COVID-19 pandemicBr J Gen Pract2020DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X709925.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Fritz Z,
    2. Perkins GD
    Cardiopulmonary resuscitation after hospital admission with covid-19BMJ2020doi:10.1136/bmj.m1387
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Couper K,
    2. Taylor-Phillips S,
    3. Grove A,
    4. et al.
    COVID-19 in cardiac arrest and infection risk to rescuers: a systematic reviewResuscitation20201515966
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Mahase E,
    2. Kmietowicz Z
    Covid-19: doctors are told not to perform CPR on patients in cardiac arrestBMJ2020doi:10.1136/bmj.m1282
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Public Health England
    COVID-19: infection prevention and control guidance UK2020https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/886668/COVID-19_Infection_prevention_and_control_guidance_complete.pdf (accessed 10 Jul 2020).
  7. 7.↵
    1. Center for Disease Control and Prevention
    Interim infection prevention and control recommendations for patients with suspected or confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in healthcare settings2020https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/infection-control-recommendations.html (accessed 10 Jul 2020).
  8. 8.↵
    1. European Resuscitation Council (ERC)
    European Resuscitation Council COVID-19 guidelines2020
  9. 9.↵
    1. Resuscitation Council UK
    Updated RCUK statement on PHE PPE guidance: 28April20202020https://www.resus.org.uk/media/statements/resuscitation-council-uk-statements-on-covid-19-coronavirus-cpr-and-resuscitation/statement-on-phe-ppe-guidance (accessed 10 Jul 2020).
  10. 10.↵
    1. Shao F,
    2. Xu S,
    3. Ma X,
    4. et al.
    In-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes among patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, ChinaResuscitation20201511823
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 70 (697)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 70, Issue 697
August 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in primary and community care during the COVID-19 pandemic
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in primary and community care during the COVID-19 pandemic
Kamlesh Khunti, Sebastian Straube, Anil Adisesh, Xin Hui S Chan, Amitava Banerjee, Trisha Greenhalgh
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (697): 374-375. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X711797

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in primary and community care during the COVID-19 pandemic
Kamlesh Khunti, Sebastian Straube, Anil Adisesh, Xin Hui S Chan, Amitava Banerjee, Trisha Greenhalgh
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (697): 374-375. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X711797
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Stroke: time to address cognition
  • Was enough, and is enough, being done to protect the primary care workforce from COVID-19?
  • Primary care networks: are they fit for the future?
Show more Editorials

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242