Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

The absurd general practitioner

Sati Heer-Stavert
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (697): 394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X711929
Sati Heer-Stavert
Birmingham, with an interest in philosophy and its relevance to health care. Email:
Roles: GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: heerstavert@gmail.com@SatiHeerStavert
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

I’ll always remember consoling a couple who had recently lost their child to leukaemia. Less than 10 minutes later a lifelong smoker was telling me they were expecting their centenary birthday card from the Queen.

An individual working as a GP runs the risk of becoming an automaton. Evidence-based medicine and professional standardisation contribute to uniformity and, by definition, a reduction in diversity. It is both risky and strenuous to act outside of established clinical behaviours, and instead we acquiesce. The automaton GP is unable to deviate from the prescribed sequence of actions but can sleep easy at night without contemplating the true terror of clinical life. Nevertheless, it may only take one tragic clinical outcome to change a clinician and undermine their entire mode of practice. This brief moment of reflection is dangerous: we decide whether working in a familiar yet obscure world is more preferable than becoming a stranger in our own profession.

Of all professionals, it is perhaps the GP who most witnesses the full spectrum of human life. We are well poised to witness intergenerational medicine with all its banality and eccentricities. Despite our prestigious position, attempting to fathom the untimely death of a child using statistics or genetics is to debase the universe to a level where a human might understand it. In reality, there is no reconciliation but our appetite to find invisible patterns cannot be satiated.

Greek mythology tells us of Sisyphus, who is forever pushing a boulder up a hill only for it to roll back down again. This was his eternal punishment for evading death. Within health care this myth has become analogous with the endless task of helping patients. Existing interpretations reveal two major themes. First, the patient (the boulder), is considered a burden and, second, that healthcare professionals (Sisyphus) can reduce the burden through teamwork. I hope to propose an alternative interpretation, one that is based upon the absurdist philosophy of Albert Camus (1913–1960). The absurd refers to the constant conflict humans encounter when searching for meaning and order in a meaningless and chaotic universe. In this version, the task of healthcare provision is no longer tiresome or futile.

Figure

Sati Heer-Stavert

Feeling sentimental about the golden era of medicine when life was straightforward is a dangerous thing, especially when we know that it never existed. Yet many of us believe it. The use of the word nostalgia in absurdism describes our yearning for a unified clarity. GPs are rational individuals trying to make logical sense of the things presented to them. But the world is complex and we make artificial connections between events that are beyond human comprehension. Children inexplicably develop leukaemia. The universe of the prion is very different from that of the cow. Our nostalgia juxtaposed with the unreasonable silence of our universe is the substrate for absurdism.

It is interesting that Sisyphus himself tried to escape death, the very thing health care is designed to do. Perhaps there is a natural attraction for the GP to view themselves as a Sisyphean character. When we gaze upon our computer monitor to see the appointment slots laden with names we recognise, it is human to question whether the task is pointless. Hope with its simplicity becomes our thoughtless crutch. On the contrary, the absurd practitioner acknowledges the struggle and like a chronic illness recognises that there is no cure but constant friction. Life without hope or meaning becomes better. Accepting and revolting against our own obscurity gives life value.

Primary care coerces us to act with a concern for the future as if we can direct it, despite the facts highlighting the contradiction in our liberty. Freedom only arrives when we are released from being responsible for the future. Once the absurd is realised the illusion is shattered and instead we develop passion for life as it really is. We conclude that maximising life’s rich experiences regardless of how deplorable they may be is the only option. Both doctor and patient can live the adventure that is their life.

Managing uncertainty is perhaps the defining characteristic of general practice. At a time when doctors and patients seek simple solutions to increasingly complex problems, an absurdist approach to health care has never been more relevant. Camus said that ‘if the world were clear, art would not exist’, and I would suggest that if health was straightforward there would be no primary care. Each patient experience contributes a stroke to our masterpiece.

As GPs we need not imagine whether Sisyphus was happy; we need only ask ourselves.

Footnotes

  • This article was first posted on BJGP Life on 10 June 2020: bjgplife.com/absurdGP

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2020
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 70 (697)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 70, Issue 697
August 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The absurd general practitioner
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The absurd general practitioner
Sati Heer-Stavert
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (697): 394. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X711929

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The absurd general practitioner
Sati Heer-Stavert
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (697): 394. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X711929
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • A groundhog century? Collings and the crisis in general practice
  • How much does a GP cost?
  • Opening up the black boxes of our primary care systems
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242