Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Pride and prejudice in the NHS

Judith Dawson
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (697): 398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X711977
Judith Dawson
Kettering, Northamptonshire; Clinical Lead for Leonard Cheshire, London. Email:
Roles: GP, Weavers Medical
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: judith.dawson3@nhs.net
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Friday lunchtime, on call, mid-pandemic. A message from the midwife asked me to phone a lady requiring referral to the early miscarriage unit as she had a private scan result that showed no detectable fetal heartbeat. It transpired that this patient, in her late twenties, had a distressing obstetric history that included a stillborn child, a neonatal death, and intervening treatment for malignancy. She had sought an early ultrasound in the private sector that had shown a missed miscarriage at 10 weeks’ gestation. Quite naturally she had contacted her midwife to be told that only a GP could refer her to the NHS service.

When I did this, the on-call clinician was scathing about patients who had early scans in the private sector and the problems this caused. It took some persistence to relay the context of this patient and her distress and arrange an assessment. ‘Well, anyway the most likely thing is that we are going to offer no intervention, especially now with coronavirus’ was the final grudging comment.

SUFFERING TAKES PLACE IN FULL VIEW OF CLINICIANS

Working in the NHS, we understandably have a tradition of pride in a system that is free for all at the point of need. Increasingly, however, this is reinforcing an attitude that patients should be grateful for what they are offered rather than a critical evaluation of the type of service available and the effect that it has on the individual. Richard Smith1 has recently written on the neglect of suffering in medical care, making reference to unavoidable suffering (the illness and its sequelae) and avoidable suffering (which our organisation and behaviours impose on patients).2

This lady had already endured exceptional unavoidable suffering and yet was being forced into a circuitous loop to obtain basic care, which, from the telephone demeanour of the clinician, was going to be perfunctory in the extreme. This suffering was increased by a prejudice against her from the outset because she had sought a scan in the private sector, a reassurance not available to her in the normal antenatal routine. We need to acknowledge that, even before COVID-19, the NHS was often barely covering standard care for common clinical conditions, a fact made explicit by NICE, which states that guideline implementation is not mandatory and should be taken in ‘the context of local and national priorities for funding and developing services’.3 The recommendation on the management of early pregnancy loss is clear: ‘Treat all women with early pregnancy complications with dignity and respect. Be aware that women will react to complications or the loss of a pregnancy in different ways. Provide all women with information and support in a sensitive manner, taking into account their individual circumstances and emotional response.’3

Figure1

Landscape with the Fall of Icarus, c.1555, Pieter Bruegel (the Elder). © Bridgeman Art Library / Royal Musuems of Fine Arts of Belgium.

The difficult circumstances of the COVID-19 environment have unfortunately led to a more rigid and unsympathetic approach in many quarters. If your local hospital is unable to offer care that is compliant with NICE guidelines, should you be penalised for seeking this in the private sector? Does seeking compassionate, reassuring, or even recommended care mark you as demanding and difficult?

Richard Smith refers in his article to Auden’s poem written in 1938, ‘Musée des Beaux Arts’, and the concept that suffering takes place out of sight, in the corner of the picture.4 Increasingly it appears to me that this interpretation of the Brueghel painting The Fall of Icarus (c. 1555), to which the poem refers, is not appropriate to current NHS practice. Suffering takes place in full view of clinicians, and we are wilfully blind to it, seeking to hide behind rigid protocols, the sop of generic leaflets, or impersonal group counselling sessions in order to avoid confronting it ourselves.

HOW MUCH DOES IT TAKE FOR US TO GENUINELY EXPRESS SORROW AND COMPASSION FOR THE TERRIBLE TRIALS OUR PATIENTS ENDURE?

Perhaps it is the NHS clinician who is Icarus, flying too close to the sun of belief that we deliver optimal treatment for our patients and ignoring the unmet needs that drive them into the private sector. The suffering patient is the ploughman in the foreground trudging on through the thick clay of sorrow and disease, not the young man engaged in an upwards, coruscating flight or a dazzling dive into an azure sea.

Footnotes

  • This article was first posted on BJGP Life on 11 June 2020: bjgplife.com/NHSprejudice. Some patient details were adjusted to preserve anonymity but full patient written consent was obtained before publication.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2020

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Smith R
    Richard Smith: Healthcare not only fails to respond to suffering but often makes it worseBMJ Opinion202026Mayhttps://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/05/26/richard-smith-healthcare-not-only-fails-to-respond-to-suffering-but-often-makes-it-worse/ (accessed 23 Jun 2020).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mylod DE,
    2. Lee TH
    A framework for reducing suffering in health careHarvard Business Review201314Novhttps://hbr.org/2013/11/a-framework-for-reducing-suffering-in-health-care (accessed 23 Jun 2020).
  3. 3.↵
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: diagnosis and initial management NG126LondonNICE2019https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng126/chapter/Recommendations (accessed 23 Jun 2020).
  4. 4.↵
    1. Auden WH
    Collected poemsLondonFaber & Faber1994
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 70 (697)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 70, Issue 697
August 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pride and prejudice in the NHS
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Pride and prejudice in the NHS
Judith Dawson
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (697): 398. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X711977

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Pride and prejudice in the NHS
Judith Dawson
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (697): 398. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X711977
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • SUFFERING TAKES PLACE IN FULL VIEW OF CLINICIANS
    • HOW MUCH DOES IT TAKE FOR US TO GENUINELY EXPRESS SORROW AND COMPASSION FOR THE TERRIBLE TRIALS OUR PATIENTS ENDURE?
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Depreciating assets: the female experience of health in the UK
  • Yonder: Autism, home visits, suicidal ideation, and young sudden cardiac death
  • Bullying during COVID-19: the impact on child and adolescent health
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242