Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editor’s Briefing

Herd Thinking

Euan Lawson
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (699): 476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X712661
Euan Lawson
BJGP
Roles: Acting Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The daily reporting of the COVID-19 deaths during the pandemic has been a sobering, sometimes emotional, expression of the toll on our community. A reductive perspective on the pandemic has often pitted those lives versus the economy and they have been characterised as mutually exclusive, irreconcilable enemies, locked in a grotesque battle. In recent decades, gross domestic product (GDP) is a single number that dominates our lives. This concept of the ‘economy’ has been described as ‘trying to squeeze a frog into a matchbox’.1 Imagine if we tried to encapsulate the full spectrum of medical activities into a single stat. Losing one’s job is a real and devastating event but beware the numbers: we could raise GDP at a pen stroke by including unpaid care work, a burden shouldered disproportionately by women.

The arrival of any vaccine will doubtless mean conversations with the nervous, the reluctant, and the outright hostile. We will present our case, back it up with solid data, and expect the evidence to do its magic. It’s a natural position for many medics, we’re comfortable (perhaps too much) with the positivist philosophical approach of an objective reality that we can observe and count. That is the appeal of GDP as well. Yet, to our horror, people will resist and we will label them anti-vaxxers. We will then be divided with heated spats sizzling and spitting across social media and in our discussions.

When it comes to these difficult conversations, it could be useful to recall social psychologist Jonathan Haidt’s analogy of the elephant and the rider.2 When it comes to decisions, in reality, the elephant, our initial emotional reaction, is usually deciding the direction of travel. The rider can have an influence, but more commonly, sits astride the elephant, making it clear that the rider wanted, in a happy coincidence, to go this way all along. It can knock our sense of self as autonomous individuals but we mostly use our powers of reason for post-hoc rationalisation. We need to appeal to the elephant and not the rider, if we want someone to change direction.

Eula Biss has written beautifully on vaccination and its role in society noting that ‘immunity’ comes from the Latin munis meaning service or duty.3 Of course, immunity means to be exempted and therefore protected. Herd immunity has already been a controversial topic in this pandemic; the government flirted with it, keen to protect the economy, until someone actually noticed the potential death rate. In the GDP versus mortality contest the Government blinked and plumped for people. Small mercies, you may think. Biss also wrote that ‘Immunity is a shared space — a garden we tend together.’ 3 It could serve us to remember the collective nature of immunisation. Numbers will rarely trump emotion.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2020

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Pilling D
    The growth delusion. The wealth and well-being of nationsLondonBloomsbury Publishing2018
  2. 2.↵
    1. Haidt J
    The righteous mind Why good people are divided by politics and religionLondonPenguin2013
  3. 3.↵
    1. Biss E
    On immunity. An inoculationMinneapolis, MNGraywolf Press2014
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 70 (699)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 70, Issue 699
October 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Herd Thinking
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Herd Thinking
Euan Lawson
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (699): 476. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X712661

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Herd Thinking
Euan Lawson
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (699): 476. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X712661
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Shock Therapy — Disaster Remodelling in the NHS
  • The Global Primary Care Crisis
  • Listen to Your Patient
Show more Editor’s Briefing

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242