Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editorials

Home visits for vulnerable older people: journeys to the ‘Far End’

Gordon Macdonald, Gervase Vernon, Duncan McNab and JC Murdoch
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (699): 479-480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X712685
Gordon Macdonald
NHS Education Scotland (West), Glasgow, UK.
Roles: GP and Associate Advisor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gervase Vernon
John Tasker House and Felsted Surgery, Dunmow, UK.
Roles: Retired GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Duncan McNab
NHS Education Scotland (West), Glasgow, UK.
Roles: GP and Assistant Director
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JC Murdoch
Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; Emeritus Professor of Rural and Remote Medicine, Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Roles: Retired GP; Honorary Fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

INTRODUCTION

Health care has seen a seismic shift to the utilisation of telehealth, remote consulting, and virtual meetings. Through the use of this technology many practices have seen a significant reduction in home visits, an acceleration of existing trends.1 However, at the boundaries of such acceleration we find older patients, people at the ‘Far End’.

This newly named Far End cohort may experience further marginalisation if the existing decline in home visits continues.2 Therefore, this Far End concept, the nature of home visits, a blended model of delivery, and virtual visits should now be considered to ensure the equitable, efficient, and safe provision of home visits to those at the Far End.

FAR END

Our older patients represent this Far End and are analogous to Deep End patients.3 They experience the same levels of multimorbidity and associated drivers of the inverse care law, such as permeability of service access, candidacy, and health-seeking behaviour.4 Moreover, Far End older patients often have the associated burdens of sensory losses, declining capacity, reduced social capital, sarcopenia, and frailty. Undoubtedly, COVID-19 has exacerbated some of these Far End factors and reduced home visits. Therefore, it seems timely to review our provision of home visits in terms of their benefit, who should provide them, and the impact of virtual visits, particularly in the Far End population.

HOME VISITS OR HOUSE CALLS?

Being allowed into the home of people from every section of society is a rare privilege. It is surely more than the brief impersonal interaction suggested by a ‘house call’. A ‘home visit’ conveys concepts of relationship and welcome. Doubtless they are time expensive, but this investment speaks of dignity and value that transcend time. Home visits remind us that our ‘histories with patients are novels not unconnected short stories’.5

Patients are the host; they are put at ease as the power dynamic tips more in their favour. While research shows inconsistent outcomes from home visits it is known that trust is enhanced, and patients are seen in their psychosocial context.6

Through intuitive observations and healthy curiosity, we gain insights into medication compliance (those cupboards overflowing with untaken drugs), functional status and family support (the foot-long front lawn), and executive function (that pile of unopened bills). The furniture and decoration, especially the pictures and photographs, are like a projection of a person’s mind. Patients become more readily seen, as people, with an illness. This fuller picture allows us to discern ‘what matters most’ to our patients.7

Perhaps these insights matter most for our Far End patients where this deeper knowledge of our patients enhances our empathy and advocacy? Perhaps those moments of transitional care planning are made easier as shared decision making is more fully informed?

A BLENDED MODEL

Home visit provision is, however, a contentious issue, and who should provide these home visits also remains a moot point with a limited evidence base.8 Paramedics and advanced nurse practioners are increasingly used for home visits in primary care in the UK, but there is wide variation.

A recent systematic review reported a reduction in GP workload in some studies where paramedics provided urgent care to non-complex patients, including home visits; whereas other studies showed patients may require or expect the input of a doctor after paramedic assessment.9 Some paramedic-led consultations have been shown to be longer than other primary care clinicians’ and currently there is no evidence base supporting the role of paramedics in long-term condition care or multimorbidity.10 These factors may suggest the efficiency and added value of paramedic care within primary care needs further study.

There is some evidence to suggest advanced nurse practioners provide effective home visits in an urgent care out-of-hours setting, with similar patient outcomes to GP consultations, but the role of advanced nurse practioners in scheduled long-term condition visits is less clear.11 As the delegation of home visits develops, practioners will need clarity around boundaries and understanding of roles.12

Therefore, a blended model of home visits may be appropriate with acute presentations being delegated to paramedics or advanced nurse practioners. Long-term conditions or more complex Far End cases may be best retained by the GP until the evidence base and ways to implement recommendations have been established.

VIRTUAL WARDS OR VIRTUAL HOME VISITS

A logical extension of our COVID-19 induced acceleration to video consultations may be towards virtual home visits. Virtual wards and integrated home-based care have existed for several years. It is difficult to draw firm conclusions that they achieve their aim of reducing hospital admission rates.13 Studies in the UK, Canada, and the US do show a reduction but require ‘meso’ levels of integration, are more secondary care led, and require resources not typically available to primary care.14–16

As primary care recovers from COVID-19, virtual home visits are likely to develop more organically, requiring only micro-integration and minimal additional resource. Expressions of this are being trialled, with GPs visiting patients (sometimes during the district nurse visit) by video links, often augmented by basic medical equipment. Further strategies (for example, family involvement and a practice tablet) need trialling to mitigate the inverse care law in Far End patients with less ability to utilise such technology

There will always be a need for home visits (in person or remotely). Their optimal provision requires further research, most critically in our Far End patients. What seems clear is that the additional knowledge we gain about our patients combines with an expression of compassion as the GP ‘is out on home visits’ — Cum Scientia Caritas.

Notes

Provenance

Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Competing interests

The authors have declared no competing interests.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2020

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Macdonald G
    Establishing ‘Far End’ practices in the wake of COVID-19BJGP Life20206Mayhttps://bjgplife.com/2020/05/06/the-far-end-of-coronavirus (accessed 1 Sep 2020).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Thornton J
    COVID-19: how coronavirus will change the face of general practice foreverBMJ2020368m1279
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Watt G
    Reflections at the deep endBr J Gen Pract2012DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp12X616210.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Dixon-Woods M,
    2. Cavers D,
    3. Agarwal S,
    4. et al.
    Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groupsBMC Med Res Methodol2006635
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Frey J
    General practitioners at the deep end: the experience and views of general practitioners working in the most severely deprived areas of ScotlandBr J Gen Pract2012DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp12X652427.
  6. 6.↵
    1. van Kempen JAL,
    2. Robben SHM,
    3. Zuidema SU,
    4. et al.
    Home visits for frail older people: a qualitative study on the needs and preferences of frail older people and their informal caregiversBr J Gen Pract2012DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp12X653606.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Gawande A
    Being mortal: medicine and what matters in the endNew York, NYMetropolitan Books2014
  8. 8.↵
    1. Bower E
    LMCs vote to remove home visits from GP contractGPonline201922Novhttps://www.gponline.com/lmcs-vote-remove-home-visits-gp-contract/article/1666629 (accessed 1 Sep 2020).
  9. 9.↵
    1. Eaton G,
    2. Wong G,
    3. Williams V,
    4. et al.
    Contribution of paramedics in primary and urgent care: a systematic reviewBr J Gen Pract2020DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X709877.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Halter M,
    2. Marlow T,
    3. Mohammed D,
    4. Ellison GTH
    A patient survey of out-of-hours care provided by emergency care practitionersBMC Emerg Med200774
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Collins D
    Assessing the effectiveness of advanced nurse practitioners undertaking home visits in an out of hours urgent primary care service in EnglandJ Nurs Manag2019272450458
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Abrams R,
    2. Wong G,
    3. Mahtani KR,
    4. et al.
    Delegating home visits in general practice: a realist review on the impact on GP workload and patient careBr J Gen Pract2020DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X710153.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Lewis G,
    2. Vaithianathan R,
    3. Wright L,
    4. et al.
    Integrating care for high-risk patients in England using the virtual ward model: lessons in the process of care integration from three case sitesInt J Integr Care201313e046
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Leung DYP,
    2. Lee DTF,
    3. Lee IFK,
    4. et al.
    The effect of a virtual ward program on emergency services utilization and quality of life in frail elderly patients after discharge: a pilot studyClin Interv Aging201510413420
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.
    1. Low LL,
    2. Tan SY,
    3. Ng MJM,
    4. et al.
    Applying the integrated practice unit concept to a modified virtual ward model of care for patients at highest risk of readmission: a randomized controlled trialPLoS One2017121e0168757
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Akhtar S,
    2. Loganathan M,
    3. Nowaczynski M,
    4. et al.
    Aging at home: a portrait of home-based primary care across CanadaHealthc Q20192213035
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 70 (699)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 70, Issue 699
October 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Home visits for vulnerable older people: journeys to the ‘Far End’
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Home visits for vulnerable older people: journeys to the ‘Far End’
Gordon Macdonald, Gervase Vernon, Duncan McNab, JC Murdoch
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (699): 479-480. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X712685

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Home visits for vulnerable older people: journeys to the ‘Far End’
Gordon Macdonald, Gervase Vernon, Duncan McNab, JC Murdoch
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (699): 479-480. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X712685
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • INTRODUCTION
    • FAR END
    • HOME VISITS OR HOUSE CALLS?
    • A BLENDED MODEL
    • VIRTUAL WARDS OR VIRTUAL HOME VISITS
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Socioeconomic deprivation and post-stroke care in the community
  • Advocating for patients through laboratory tests: what do GPs’ use of blood tests for suspected cancer tell us?
  • Diagnosis of prostate cancer in primary care: navigating updated clinical guidance
Show more Editorials

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242