Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

‘Bad old habits’ … and what really matters

Deborah Swinglehurst, Chris Dowrick, Iona Heath, Stefan Hjörleifsson, Sally Hull, David Misselbrook and Joanne Reeve
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (699): 485-486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X712745
Deborah Swinglehurst
Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. Email:
Roles: Professor of Primary Care
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: d.swinglehurst@qmul.ac.uk
Chris Dowrick
University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Roles: Professor of Primary Medical Care
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Iona Heath
Former President of the Royal College of General Practitioners, UK.
Roles: Retired GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan Hjörleifsson
Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Roles: Associate Professor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sally Hull
Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Roles: Clinical Reader in Primary Care Development
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Misselbrook
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Bahrain.
Roles: Associate Professor of Family Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joanne Reeve
Hull-York Medical School, Hull, UK
Roles: Professor of Primary Care Research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Matt Hancock has urged GPs (30 July) that ‘all consultations should be teleconsultations’ and that we mustn’t ‘fall back into bad old habits’, thus freeing up clinicians to concentrate on what ‘really matters’.1

Teleconsultations are potentially dangerous for patients and professionals. It is vitally important not only to be able to listen to the patient, but also to see them and to touch them. Without the ability to examine patients and pick up other clues, diagnoses will be missed or delayed.

Teleconsultations may also prevent those who are disadvantaged or in danger at home from seeking appropriate help. Although they may offer convenience for some patients with discrete, clearly defined problems, teleconsultations are incapable of embracing the inherent ‘messiness’ of most clinical situations.

What really matters is that we maximise opportunities for meaningful therapeutic engagement with patients. It really matters that we do not assume that what has been necessary in a crisis represents what patients or clinicians want or need beyond.

The consultation really matters. It is not simply an exchange of facts, diagnoses, and prescriptions. Done well, the consultation is of therapeutic value, especially when embedded within an enduring relationship. If, as Hancock suggested, we are to ‘encourage and celebrate generalist skills’,1 then we must retain the consultation at its centre.

We urge caution in mandating a wholesale shift towards teleconsultations without thorough evaluation. Existing research suggests that telephone triage increases workload with no cost savings, and the value of e-consultation and video-consultation remains controversial.

GPs and patients across the UK are on a steep learning curve, working out how to ‘do’ remote consultations out of necessity, and it is highly likely they will find their place within mainstream practice. However we do believe that some ‘bad old habits’ may be worth holding on to.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2020

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Hancock M
    The future of healthcare2020https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-future-of-healthcare (accessed 10 Sep 2020).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 70 (699)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 70, Issue 699
October 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
‘Bad old habits’ … and what really matters
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
‘Bad old habits’ … and what really matters
Deborah Swinglehurst, Chris Dowrick, Iona Heath, Stefan Hjörleifsson, Sally Hull, David Misselbrook, Joanne Reeve
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (699): 485-486. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X712745

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
‘Bad old habits’ … and what really matters
Deborah Swinglehurst, Chris Dowrick, Iona Heath, Stefan Hjörleifsson, Sally Hull, David Misselbrook, Joanne Reeve
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (699): 485-486. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X712745
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination: a wake-up call from case reports
  • Who is your doctor?
  • Jacquet erosive dermatitis in an era of ‘going green’
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242