Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Finding meaning in the consultation: introducing the hermeneutic window

Rupal Shah, Robert Clarke, Sanjiv Ahluwalia and John Launer
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (699): 502-503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X712865
Rupal Shah
Education Lead Professional Development, Health Education England, London. Email:
Roles: Associate Dean
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rupal.shah@hee.nhs.uk
Robert Clarke
GP and independent medical educator, Hertfordshire.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sanjiv Ahluwalia
Health Education England, London.
Roles: Regional Postgraduate Dean
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Launer
Health Education England, London.
Roles: Programme Director for Innovation
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

INTRODUCTION

The ability to offer individualised care to patients remains a key component of general practice. This is more important now than ever, given that the care we provide as GPs is likely to involve less face-to-face contact even once the threat of COVID-19 has passed. Many consultation frameworks address only generic skills and largely ignore the extent to which the clinician is able to establish a human connection, to understand what an illness means to their patient and to help them navigate through it, particularly when there is uncertainty and complexity within the consultation. This person-centred approach is the bedrock upon which general practice was founded and deserves further analysis. In this article, we introduce a new four-domain model to describe the skills and approaches needed by clinicians in order to encourage consultations that are individualised and create meaning for both patient and clinician. This model could help to guide training, as well as validating these consultation skills for practising clinicians.

WHOLE-PERSON CARE

Iona Heath reminds us that ‘clinicians must see and hear each patient in the fullness of his or her humanity in order to minimise fear, to locate hope (however limited), to explain symptoms and diagnoses in language that makes sense to the particular patient, to witness courage and endurance, and to accompany suffering’.1

In an interview recorded before his death in 2011,2 Dr Kieran Sweeney, a retired GP and Professor of Primary Care, poignantly described what was missing in the outwardly faultless chain of encounters that culminated in his diagnosis of mesothelioma. Although there were no delays at any stage, he didn’t feel that there was enough in the way of human connection or consideration given to what the diagnosis meant for him and for his family, and this absence made a difference to his ability to come to terms with his disease. Yet, if his trajectory were audited, it could reasonably be concluded that everything was done correctly, from the initial referral through to the eventual diagnosis. Earlier in his career, he and other colleagues had written about ‘personal significance’ as an important dimension of the patient encounter.3

Commonly used consultation frameworks fail to capture the humanity inherent within any meaningful encounter between a patient and a clinician adequately; rather we tend to analyse the consultation from a transactional point of view and, in doing so, do not capture the subtleties of communication that add huge value to patients and to clinicians themselves. Doctors who practise with empathy have been shown to have lower rates of burnout.4

As an aid to promoting the values and skills we have described, we propose a model that includes a hermeneutic dimension. The term hermeneutics, derived from the Greek word ‘ hermeneuo’ which means ‘translate’ or ‘interpret’, originally pertained to the interpretation of classical texts. Here we take hermeneutics to signify an approach that seeks to help doctor and patient find and create meaning in a context-specific manner; the perspectives of both are brought together during any consultation, thereby generating new understanding. In this sense, there is a close relation between hermeneutics and narrative practice.5

There is much that has been written on how we can promote a hermeneutic approach6–8 In broad terms, we would suggest that important attributes include curiosity; awareness of the multiple influences on both patient and practitioner; ability to challenge a narrative when it is ‘stuck’; and compassion. Supervisors may wish to encourage trainees to consider multiple possible interpretations of a patient’s story and how each might influence their own management choices.

INTRODUCING THE HERMENEUTIC WINDOW MODEL

We propose a model to describe the skills and attributes that contribute to whole-person care. It is represented as a two-by-two table with four separate but related domains (Figure 1). The first column is labelled biomedical and is supported by the natural sciences, whereas the second column is labelled humanistic and has its foundation within the social sciences. Window 1 consists of clinical skills, such as history taking and physical examination of different systems, underpinned by knowledge, including an awareness of current guidelines.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

The hermeneutic window model.

The second window directly above this, evidence-based practice, represents the application of such knowledge and skills to a specific patient in a specific context, rather than being based on a population in a clinical trial. This usually entails an increase in complexity and is frequently also accompanied by an increase in uncertainty because the ‘right’ answer for an individual patient may not be certain, even in the face of clear evidence from the scientific literature.

Within the humanistic column, communication skills in window 3 go beyond basic history taking to include some of the skills of person-centred consulting, for example, eliciting a patient’s ideas and concerns about their symptoms and using patient expectations as a basis for negotiating a shared management plan.

Finally, we reach the hermeneutic window of window 4 where assumptions, meanings, and roles are interpreted in a way that is particular to the individual. This is often the area of greatest complexity and uncertainty, where questions about what it means to be a healthcare professional are asked and relationships with individual patients are examined. It entails reflective practice and the exploration of values and beliefs. What are the assumptions, biases, and judgements that are informing clinical decision making? What are the external influences on the consultation, for example, performance incentive schemes, external quality regulators, fear of litigation, and time pressures? This is where validation of a patient’s experience (Heath’s ‘doctor as witness’)9 is important and where a GP may uncover a web of meanings,10 trigger a new insight (Heron’s ‘catalytic intervention’),11 or may help a patient to move on from a stuck autobiographical narrative.12 Central to this is a view of individuals as having both agency and creative capacity.6 A hermeneutic gaze can be equally powerful in supporting, challenging, and transforming both clinicians and patients during the consultation and beyond (Figure 2).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Case study. Mrs T is a 52-year-old woman who is a frequent attender at the practice. In the last year she has presented with multiple symptoms including lower back pain, tennis elbow, and low abdominal pain. This time she attends with a headache, which the GP diagnoses as a migraine.

IMPLICATIONS

The model we propose encourages us to notice the particularities of each encounter we have with our patients and to recognise when there are deviations from usual patterns. It prompts us to examine our values, challenge our assumptions, and to practise with empathy. It should make us ask not just the generic question: ‘What sort of a doctor am I?’ but also the more specific: ‘What is my role with this particular patient at this time?’ Entering the hermeneutic window requires both an investment of time and a willingness to navigate uncertainty. By identifying and legitimising the skills included in the hermeneutic window, we hope to preserve the whole-person care that is central to general practice. This may become even more pertinent if we do move away from traditional models of care.

SUMMARY

Hermeneutic approaches involve the interpretation of meaning, roles, and values, and are particularly important when dealing with complexity or uncertainty. They are an essential complement to the biomedical model, influencing and framing many discussions between practitioners and patients. A four-domain model emphasises the importance of the hermeneutic window in providing whole-person care.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2020

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Heath I
    How medicine has exploited rationality at the expense of humanity: an essay by Iona HeathBMJ2016355i5705
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Sweeney Kieran, Dr
    6Nov2012YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TignNvHNx4&t=301 (accessed 4 Sep 2020).
  3. 3.↵
    1. Pereira-Gray D,
    2. Evans P,
    3. Sweeney K,
    4. et al.
    Personal significance: the third dimensionLancet19983519096134136
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Wilkinson H,
    2. Whittington R,
    3. Perry L,
    4. Eames C
    Examining the relationship between burnout and empathy in healthcare professionals: a systematic reviewBurn Res201761829
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Launer J
    Narrative-based practice in health and social care: conversations inviting changeAbingdonRoutledge2018
  6. 6.↵
    1. Reeve J
    Interpretive medicine. Supporting generalism in a changing primary care worldOccas Pap R Coll Gen Pract201088iviii120
  7. 7.
    1. Royal College of General Practitioners
    The RCGP Curriculum Being a general practitioner2019https://www.rcgp.org.uk/-/media/Files/GP-training-and-exams/Curriculum/curriculum-being-a-gp-rcgp.ashx?la=en (accessed 4 Sep 2020).
  8. 8.↵
    1. Leder D
    Clinical interpretation: the hermeneutics of medicineTheor Med1990111924
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Heath I,
    2. Berger J
    Matters of life and death Key writingsOxfordRadcliffe Publishing2008
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kleinman A
    The illness narratives Suffering, healing and the human conditionNew YorkBasic Books1998
  11. 11.↵
    1. Heron J
    Helping the client A creative practical guide5th ednLondonSAGE Publications Ltd2001
  12. 12.↵
    1. Launer J
    Conversations inviting changePostgrad Med J20088498745
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 70 (699)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 70, Issue 699
October 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Finding meaning in the consultation: introducing the hermeneutic window
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Finding meaning in the consultation: introducing the hermeneutic window
Rupal Shah, Robert Clarke, Sanjiv Ahluwalia, John Launer
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (699): 502-503. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X712865

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Finding meaning in the consultation: introducing the hermeneutic window
Rupal Shah, Robert Clarke, Sanjiv Ahluwalia, John Launer
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (699): 502-503. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X712865
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • INTRODUCTION
    • WHOLE-PERSON CARE
    • INTRODUCING THE HERMENEUTIC WINDOW MODEL
    • IMPLICATIONS
    • SUMMARY
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Yonder: Sexual health in diabetes, contraceptive empowerment, legal support for homeless people, and good Chinese doctors
  • Books: What Mental Illness Really Is … (And What It Isn’t)
  • Hummingbirds and Foxes
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

Tweets by @BJGPjournal

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242