Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Trying to carve nature at its joints: respecting the complexity of psychiatric diagnosis

Louise Stone
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (699): 504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X712877
Louise Stone
GP with a clinical, teaching, research, and policy interest in mental health and doctors’ health; Associate Professor, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: louise.stone@anu.edu.au@GPSwampWarrior
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

PSYCHIATRIC TAXONOMIES

It would be nice if the world of mental health fell neatly into a taxonomy. It would be nice if we could, as Plato wrote, carve nature at its joints:1 ‘Plato famously employed this “carving” metaphor as an analogy for the reality of Forms (Phaedrus 265e): like an animal, the world comes to us predivided. Ideally, our best theories will be those which “carve nature at its joints”.’2

We would find it so much easier to cope if all human suffering could be allocated to a relevant, and distinct, category that encapsulated the likely cause and course of the disease. However, in psychiatry, the landscape is not so simple. It’s just easier in many ways to pretend it is.

Psychiatric taxonomies such as DSM-5 and ICD-11 help us to categorise mental illness into a series of diagnoses based on observable characteristics. These taxonomies have helped guide research, and the diagnoses contained within them undoubtedly ground evidence and therefore guide treatment. We have been moving towards simplifying the diagnostic process, using tools in less expert hands to screen and categorise patients, allowing these decisions to guide our treatment pathways.3 It is a seductive model, where diagnostic tools lead to psychiatric diagnosis that leads to evidence-based therapy. This industrial approach to care allows us to roll out increasingly simplistic protocols of care that can be provided, in aliquots, to tightly defined populations. And it works for some. Unfortunately, in general practice we are well acquainted with the large patient population who do not fit this botanical view of the world.

LIVED EXPERIENCE OF MENTAL ILLNESS

Fortunately, categorical diagnoses are not the only way to see mental illness. Throughout history, there have been ways of understanding mental illness that incorporate the lived experience of the person with the disorder, understanding aetiology and potential therapy in the light of this experience. Lived-experience narratives represent and respect culture, trauma histories, identity, and context. Psychological interventions utilise these narratives to shape therapy that is patient centred and recovery focused. Of course, one could argue that the patient’s narratives are important with any illness. However, mental disorders are conditions that disturb a person’s unique sense of self, a self that is biological, storied, encultured, social, political, and existential.4 Bluntly, you do not ‘have’ schizophrenia the way you ‘have’ a broken leg, because mental illness is not just about ‘having’. It is also about ‘being’.5

ECONOMIC AND MENTAL HEALTH CONSEQUENCES OF COVID-19

Good psychiatric diagnosis respects both these perspectives: A good clinician will weave together the ‘warp’ threads of categorical diagnosis (such as major depression) with the ‘weft’ threads of lived experience (such as childhood trauma) to create an explanation that respects both points of view.

At the moment, our shared experience of natural disasters and pandemic will dramatically change the weaving. Post-COVID-19, we will not simply have ‘more’ mental health disorders to deal with: what we see will be qualitatively different, shaped by the changes in our collective lived experience.

We are expecting mental health fallout across the population, and it will not just be in disorders. Parents of newborns will not have access to social support, people will grieve alone, people who are experiencing homelessness will have temporary housing with its associated temporary empathy, and will have difficulty readjusting to life without support again.

The economic consequences of COVID-19 will mean the emergence of anxiety and depression in people who had previously enjoyed a life of generous privilege. We, after months of trying to project empathy through a mask or down a phone line, will have to confront the ongoing task of caring in a world where a sustainable life as a GP seems ever more precarious. And many people, including us, will know the pain of grief and loss.

GPs are masters of complexity and uncertainty, but complex tasks take time. It is undoubtedly quicker to make categorical diagnoses via checklists and questionnaires, but, without understanding the patient and their context, the risk of iatrogenic harm is high. It’s time we recognised, respected, and researched the difficult process of holistic psychiatric diagnosis in the GP setting.

As GPs we see all patients, no matter what category they fall into. They all deserve our understanding and our care.

Footnotes

  • This article was first posted on BJGP Life on 20 Aug 2020: https://bjgplife.com/carve

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2020

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Rapley M,
    2. Moncrieff J,
    3. Dillon J
    1. Rapley M,
    2. Moncrieff J,
    3. Dillon J
    Carving nature at its joints? DSM and the medicalization of everyday lifeRapley M, Moncrieff J, Dillon JDe-medicalizing miseryLondonPalgrave Macmillan201119
  2. 2.↵
    1. Slater MH,
    2. Borghini A
    PhilArchive. 1 Introduction: lessons from the scientific butcheryhttps://philarchive.org/archive/SLAILF (accessed 3 Sep 2020).
  3. 3.↵
    1. Parker BL,
    2. Achilles MR,
    3. Subotic-Kerry M,
    4. O’Dea B
    Youth StepCare: a pilot study of an online screening and recommendations service for depression and anxiety among youth patients in general practiceBMC Fam Pract20202112
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Sadler JZ
    Values and psychiatric diagnosisOxfordOxford University Press2004
  5. 5.↵
    1. Fulford B,
    2. Morris K,
    3. Sadler JZ,
    4. et al.
    1. Kraus A
    How can the phenomenological-anthropological approach contribute to diagnosis and classification in psychiatry?Fulford B, Morris K, Sadler JZ, et al.Nature and narrative: an introduction to the new philosophy of psychiatryOxfordOxford University Press2003
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 70 (699)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 70, Issue 699
October 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Trying to carve nature at its joints: respecting the complexity of psychiatric diagnosis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Trying to carve nature at its joints: respecting the complexity of psychiatric diagnosis
Louise Stone
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (699): 504. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X712877

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Trying to carve nature at its joints: respecting the complexity of psychiatric diagnosis
Louise Stone
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (699): 504. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X712877
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • PSYCHIATRIC TAXONOMIES
    • LIVED EXPERIENCE OF MENTAL ILLNESS
    • ECONOMIC AND MENTAL HEALTH CONSEQUENCES OF COVID-19
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Books: A Bite of the Apple. A Life with Books, Writers and Virago
  • Books: Blinded by Corona. How the Pandemic Ruined Britain’s Health and Wealth and What to do About it
  • How and why have we so hazardously misconceived our NHS staff?
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242