Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Inequalities

Saul Miller
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (699): 508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X712937
Saul Miller
Wooler, Northumberland.
Roles: GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

Black infants have better survival odds in the care of black doctors though the reverse is not true; a doctor’s race has little to no impact on the health of a white infant. Black babies’ odds are not as good as their white brethren in any case but even noting that doctors vary for other reasons too — such as skill and experience — there is a clear systematic benefit from them being cared for by black doctors.1

It is tempting to seek solace from this being Florida we are talking about and not the UK. However recent examples of the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 infection on UK BAME healthcare staff2 and patients3 highlight what we already know; health inequalities are pervasive here too. Skin colour is not the only denominator of course. This has been unavoidable news at least since the publication of the Black Report in 1980.4 Reducing inequalities is one of the requirements of primary care networks (PCNs)5 though their access to public health expertise is minimal. The recent decision to abolish Public Health England in favour of a new organisation, the National Institute for Health Protection (NIHP) does not seem likely to help either. This one’s focus has already been questioned as being likely to pay insufficient attention to health promotion.6 Then there is the issue that new bodies take time to establish. The creation of PCNs is against the backdrop of a nadir in the primary care share of NHS funding and a pre-existing mismatch between deprivation and where primary care funding goes.7 Channelling the new resources coming into primary care through PCNs leaves practices still in the tight spot they were in.

COVID-19 has not helped PCNs’ development nor practices’ resilience. Now, under renewed pressure to recruit, even if additional personnel can be found and have the desired effect of eventually relieving GP workload, at present, PCNs still probably represent a net drain on primary care capacity. Supporting CCG and PCN workloads while the overall number of GPs continues steadily to reduce, deepens the vicious cycle already affecting practices’ resilience.8 The law of supply and demand means locum prices are rising, encouraging more to give up practice commitments in favour of what is often now better pay and workload control. This further erodes the chances of patients gaining the personal continuity they value. Personal continuity matters; it has been shown to save lives.9 GP distribution has been shown to be inversely associated with deprivation and sensitive to government policy, particularly funding.10 Settled GPs in a place are a minimum condition for personal continuity.

Perhaps there is hope in medical schools taking on substantially increased numbers of students this year due to A level results being based on teachers’ predictions rather than exam results. A recent survey confirms however that undergraduate exposure to primary care is still funded substantially below cost and that despite ambitions significantly to increase exposure, this is not currently happening.11 Given the size of the new problem of how to teach consultation and examination skills in an environment where most patient contacts are being conducted remotely, it seems unlikely those ambitions will be realised soon. In which case, undergraduate teaching remains a net burden and an unreliable distant prospect in terms of adding to our future workforce.

So, primary care has a declining workforce and increasing pressure on its already poor finances, while future recruitment prospects remain very uncertain. Health inequalities are still very much here and despite our problems, we are meant to be part of the solution.

We need to be clear. Good primary care is, by its nature, integrated with its community: if the community is deprived, so is its primary care. The reverse is also true.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2020

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Brad NG,
    2. Hardeman RR,
    3. Huang L,
    4. Sojourner A
    Physician–patient racial concordance and disparities in birthing mortality for newbornsPNAS2020117352119421200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Cook T,
    2. Kursumovic E,
    3. Lennane S
    Exclusive: deaths of NHS staff from covid-19 analysedHSJApril2020
  3. 3.↵
    1. Pan D,
    2. Sze S,
    3. Minhas JS,
    4. et al.
    The impact of ethnicity on clinical outcomes in COVID-19: a systematic reviewEClinicalMedicine2020DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100404.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Department of Health and Social Security
    Inequalities in health: Report of a Research Working Group1980
  5. 5.↵
    1. NHS England and NHS Improvement
    Network Contract Directed Enhanced Service. Contract specification 2020/21 — PCN Requirements and EntitlementsMarch2020
  6. 6.↵
    1. Buck K
    Health leaders raise concerns over axing of Public Health EnglandLBCSeptember2020
  7. 7.↵
    1. Levene LS,
    2. Baker R,
    3. Bankart J,
    4. et al.
    Socioeconomic deprivation scores as predictors of variations in NHS practice payments: a longitudinal study of English general practices 2013–2017Br J Gen Pract2019DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X704549.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Rimmer A
    GP numbers in England fell by more than 600 in past year, data showBMJ2020370m3366
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Baker R,
    2. Freeman GK,
    3. Haggerty,
    4. et al.
    Primary medical care continuity and patient mortality: a systematic reviewBr J Gen Pract2020DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X712289.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Asaria M,
    2. Cookson R,
    3. Fleetcroft R,
    4. Shehzad A
    Unequal socioeconomic distribution of the primary care workforce: whole-population small area longitudinal studyBMJ Open20165e008783
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Cottrell E,
    2. Alberti A,
    3. Rosenthal J,
    4. et al.
    Revealing the reality of undergraduate GP teaching in UK medical curricula: a cross-sectional questionnaire studyBr J Gen Pract2020DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X712325.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 70 (699)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 70, Issue 699
October 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inequalities
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Inequalities
Saul Miller
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (699): 508. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X712937

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Inequalities
Saul Miller
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (699): 508. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X712937
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Books: The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows
  • Ideas, Concerns, and Expectations for peace in the Middle East
  • Poem: I Would Like To Talk About Why Life Is So Unequal
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

Tweets by @BJGPjournal

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242