Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Analysis

Ten years’ GP training in China: progress and challenges

Chuan Zou, Xiao-yang Liao, John Spicer and Benedict Hayhoe
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (699): 511-512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X712961
Chuan Zou
Department of General Practice, Chengdu Fifth People’s Hospital, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu City, China.
Roles: GP and GP Trainer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiao-yang Liao
International Medical Center/Center of General Practice, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu City, China.
Roles: Professor of Primary Care
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Spicer
GP and Tutor in Clinical Ethics. Institute of Medical and Biomedical Education, St George’s University of London, London, UK.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benedict Hayhoe
Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Roles: GP and Clinical Lecturer in Primary Care
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

In 2009, China launched a programme of major primary healthcare reform, with the aim of achieving universal health coverage across urban and rural areas by 2020.1 This required a strong GP workforce. Facing a critical shortage of qualified GPs [32 400 nationwide], the Chinese government set a national target of providing 2–3 GPs per 10 000 population, a total of 300 000 GPs by 2020. Efforts to achieve this goal have progressed, as illustrated by data suggesting there were 309 800 in total (2.2 GPs per 10 000 population) in 2018 (Figure 1). We explore the progress and challenges in GP training in China over the past 10 years and its prospects for the future.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Growth of GP numbers in China from 2009 to 2018. Source: China Health Statistics from 2010 to 2019.

PROGRESS AND ACHIEVEMENT

The education of GPs has attracted significant attention from the Chinese government since 2009, with the introduction of a series of new policies and GP training programmes. Huge investment was made (20 billion RMB, £2.2 billion, $2.8 billion) during 2010–2015 to promote development of the GP workforce.2 In 2011, the State Council initiated a unique GP training system with multiple pathways, tailored for China’s huge population and uneven distribution of resources, and accounting for existing community medical personnel.

China now has five GP training programmes, each with specific aims, duration, curriculum, and targeted trainees. A new ‘5 + 3’ model of residency training (5-year medical school plus 3-year GP residency) is expected to become a gold standard. The government has established 559 hospital and 1660 community training bases nationally.3 Residency training becomes mandatory for new medical graduates from 2015, with an additional requirement that GP residents should exceed 20% of total residents, meaning that numbers of GP residents are expected to continue to rise. A new Masters’ degree in GP training has also been established as an extension of residency training, aiming to provide academic leaders in general practice and GP trainers for the next generation of GPs; more than 800 graduates received the Masters’ between 2012–2018.3

A post-transfer programme with 1 year’s curriculum (10 months’ hospital, 1 month’s community, plus 1 month’s theoretical learning) offers conversion of existing primary care providers in the community to become GPs. Since 2010, this has trained 150 000 physicians and has been the main approach to producing GPs over this short period.3 The rural designated undergraduate education programme and assistant GP programme aim to produce qualified GPs for rural and poor areas. The former offers high school graduates free medical education on condition that they work for 3 years in rural practice; between 2010 and 2018, 73 universities have enrolled more than 50 000 undergraduates on this scheme. Assistant GP training (the ‘3 + 2’ programme), starting in 2016, consists of 3-year undergraduate plus 2-year residency training and is another transitional strategy to address the shortage of GPs in undeveloped regions.

CHALLENGES IN GP TRAINING

Although the development of such a large number of new GPs in a short time frame is extremely impressive, many challenges remain in establishing a reliable and effective primary care workforce that can provide safe and clinically cost-effective primary care to a vast and varied population.

The first challenge concerns quality. China has adopted various pathways to training GPs, differing in prospective trainees, duration, curriculum, and training base. However, a uniform educational blueprint and core competencies for GP trainees were not established across these training programmes. In addition, although there are national requirements and standardisation of each programme, variation exists across China. Significant heterogeneity in training contributes to inconsistency in GP competency and jeopardises public trust.4 Furthermore, rotations in community-based clinics are short compared with hospital training; excessive exposure to hospitalised patients will not enhance the capacity of GP trainees to provide community services in future.

The GP trainer role is key in guaranteeing quality of training. However, there is a significant lack of Chinese GP trainers and their teaching ability is open to question; they are certified after only 5 days of theoretical courses and some assignments in course design. In addition, most GP trainers are hospital specialists, unfamiliar with management of common medical conditions in the community.5 Although some GP trainers are practising GPs in the community, their current work, dealing mainly with minor diseases, may lead to negative role modelling.

Retention is another huge challenge. Audit reveals that only 21.4% of students in a designated programme were willing to work in a rural community after their 3-year employment contract,6 and 57.8% of surveyed GP trainees across different programmes reported working as GPs after graduation.7 Public data in 2018 also showed there were only 156 800 (50.8%) registered GPs, despite 308 740 physicians being qualified as GPs. Low retention rates reflect current conditions in China’s hospital-driven system, where GPs in community health facilities have less pay, lower social status, and poorer career prospects compared with hospital doctors. This adversely influences the choice of talented medical students: in each year’s residency programme recruitment, GP training positions remain unfilled while other specialties are oversubscribed, for example, only 50% of 10 000 GP positions were applied for nationally in 2014.

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT

Defining the precise role of GPs in the Chinese health system is extremely important:8 like GP training in UK and Australia, it will guide the educational blueprint and help to outline the core competencies of general practice. The curriculum should be redesigned towards a more community-based schedule and reflect the real work of community health care. This requires a large cohort of qualified GP trainers in the community, and effective training programmes for GP trainers need to be developed based on local GPs’ learning needs. Although the government relies on the Chinese Medical Doctor Association to lead national standardisation, it is worth considering establishing an independent agency, akin to a national specialty board of GPs in Western countries,9 to provide academic development for GP training, accreditation, the regular assessment of training programmes, certification of GP trainers, and organisation of specialty board examinations, so as to produce homogeneously trained GPs across institutions and different training programmes.

The past decade has seen an impressive rise in GP numbers but a slow development of supporting conditions such as salary, social status, promotion, and healthcare system reform, leading to poor retention for GP graduates. Clearly, the attractiveness of the specialty needs to be further improved. Reducing the salary gap between GPs and hospital specialists should be top priority; as well as opportunities for academic research, teaching, and private business. Academic leadership should be enhanced by forming academic groups, supporting academic GPs, and making dedicated research funds available for primary care.3,10 Ultimately, training more GPs cannot be considered as a solution in isolation within the health system, as its success as a strategy to improve healthcare quality, access, and sustainability will depend on fundamental and wide-reaching reforms. Recognising the substantial cost-saving impact of primary care on healthcare systems, these reforms should include consideration of a gatekeeper role for GPs and compulsory patient registration,11 and transformation of the existing hospital-centred healthcare system to one based on primary care.12

With the new goal of training additional 400 000 GPs over a 10-year period announced by the Chinese State Council in 2018, sustained action should be taken to enhance the quality of training programmes and GP retention based on the past 10 years’ experience.

Notes

Funding

The research associated with this article was supported by the Imperial NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and the National Institute for Health Applied Research Collaboration North West London (NIHR ARC NWL). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care. This research was also supported by Scientific research project of Sichuan provincial health and family planning commission (No. 18PJ526).

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was not required or sought in the writing of this article.

Provenance

Freely submitted; externally peer reviewed.

Competing interests

Benedict Hayhoe and John Spicer are both general practitioners working in the NHS. The authors have declared no competing interests.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2020

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Chinese State Council
    Opinions of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council on deepening the health care system reform2009http://www.china.org.cn/government/scio-press-conferences/2009-04/09/content_17575378.htm (accessed 6 Aug 2020).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Wu N,
    2. Chen MY,
    3. Yan LN,
    4. et al.
    Training development report of GPs. [In Chinese]Chinese General Practice2018211011351142
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Yang H,
    2. Han JJ,
    3. Xu YL
    General practice workforce in China development challenges and outlooks. [In Chinese]Chinese General Practice2019221922672279
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Wu D,
    2. Lam TP,
    3. Lam KF,
    4. et al.
    Public views towards community health and hospital-based outpatient services and their utilisation in Zhejiang, China: a mixed methods studyBMJ Open2017711e017611
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Fetters MD,
    2. Chi C,
    3. Hu L
    Insights on developing general practice education in ChinaAcad Med201792101365
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Li WM,
    2. Zhao X,
    3. Shu QQ,
    4. et al.
    Investigation and analysis of willingness and influencing factors for rural-oriented tuition-waived medical students to perform the contract of Yunnan. [In Chinese]Chinese Journal of Social Medicine201835216735625
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Huang MJ,
    2. Qiu K,
    3. Bao R,
    4. et al.
    General medical students career confidence index GMSCCI in China. [In Chinese]Chinese General Practice2018212531233127
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Mathers N,
    2. Huang YC
    The future of general practice in China: from ‘barefoot doctors’ to GPs?Br J Gen Pract2014DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X679933.
  9. 9.↵
    1. College of Family Physicians of Canada
    Education. Education in family medicine2020https://www.cfpc.ca/en/education-professional-development/education-in-family-medicine (accessed 2 Sep 2020).
  10. 10.↵
    1. Reeve J,
    2. Dowrick CF,
    3. Freeman GK,
    4. et al.
    Examining the practice of generalist expertise: a qualitative study identifying constraints and solutionsJRSM Short Rep201341219
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Sripa P,
    2. Benedict H,
    3. Priya G,
    4. et al.
    Impact of GP gatekeeping on quality of care, and health outcomes, use, and expenditure: a systematic reviewBr J Gen Pract2019DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X702209.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Yip W,
    2. Fu H,
    3. Chen AT,
    4. et al.
    10 years of health-care reform in China: progress and gaps in Universal Health CoverageLancet20193941020411921204
    OpenUrlPubMed
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 70 (699)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 70, Issue 699
October 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ten years’ GP training in China: progress and challenges
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Ten years’ GP training in China: progress and challenges
Chuan Zou, Xiao-yang Liao, John Spicer, Benedict Hayhoe
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (699): 511-512. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X712961

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Ten years’ GP training in China: progress and challenges
Chuan Zou, Xiao-yang Liao, John Spicer, Benedict Hayhoe
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (699): 511-512. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X712961
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • PROGRESS AND ACHIEVEMENT
    • CHALLENGES IN GP TRAINING
    • RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • How do the UK’s guidelines on imaging for suspected lung cancer compare with other countries?
  • Screening children for presymptomatic type 1 diabetes
  • Developing a research agenda for social prescribing in the UK using lessons from the US
Show more Analysis

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242