Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

‘Cycling On Prescription’: a gear change or a wrong turn?

Heather Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (700): 547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X713237
Heather Jones
Formerly Research Associate in the Centre for Transport & Society at the University of the West of England, Bristol. Email:
Roles: Primary Care Nurse
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: heather.jones46@nhs.net
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

COVID-19 has taught us in the most tragic terms that socioeconomic gradients in health apply in a pandemic just as they do in chronic disease. I have a background of research into cycling and I am now a practice nurse, so for me, the UK Government’s Gear change policy,1 heralding a ‘bold vision for cycling and walking’ on the back of a boom in bike sales and journeys, has been a welcome development amid the headlines of sadness and uncertainty.

The most ear-catching part of the announcement was that of GPs prescribing cycling. But cycling advocates treat grand policy announcements with caution, mindful of the chasm between funding allocated to road building and cycle infrastructure.

ON YOUR BIKE

My last research activity was a 3-year study, Cycle Boom,2 on cycling in the older population. I interviewed 50–80 year-olds about their cycling histories to find the contexts in which there was continuation, rediscovery, disengagement, or absence of cycling through the life-course. This revealed the physical, social, and cultural factors that enable and empower older adults to achieve longevity in, or rediscovery of, cycling. Reasons for diminished motivation or confidence for cycling were multifactorial. Changes in cycling behaviours were often provoked by life events: starting a career; moving job or home; having children; change in health status; and/ or becoming a carer.

When I discuss physical activity with patients, I recall those personal accounts of cycling. My conversations with patients explore and validate their existing physical activity, whether that is walking, gardening, housework, or hobbies. I emphasise the benefits of activity for mood, sleep, stress and anxiety, and conditioning, as well as the better-known effects on weight management and cardiovascular risk.

I viewed physical activity as a ‘best-buy’ for health promotion, one that simply needed pushing up the clinical agenda. But in time-pressed consultations it is challenging to have discussions that empower the patient, given their individual circumstances and motivations. Beyond the surgery walls, conditions for cycling can make it tough to start, or restart, cycling. Clinicians will be wary of laying unrealistic expectations on patients, risking undermining the relationship with the patient.

If ‘cycling on prescription’ hopes to achieve a healthier population, then I fear the Prime Minister is in the wrong gear at the bottom of a steep hill. The NHS could make a bigger improvement on conditions for cycling and walking through its workforce, estate, supply chains, and management activity.

The NHS replenishes its workforce continually, every year training significant numbers of individuals who go on to spend long careers in service. Research indicates that changes in employment, and transitions from education to employment are change points for travel habits.3 These changed behaviours can influence and fix wider household travel resources, attitudes, and behaviours.

In my cohort of 200 student nurses I was one of only three who commuted by bicycle. There was no promotion of cycling as a healthy and affordable commuting choice, and there are no tax-efficient cycle purchase schemes available to students. The acute trust where I trained offered a secure cycling compound and changing rooms that were regularly used to capacity. Now in general practice, my bike stands alone in a makeshift store under the staircase and I’ve learnt that provision for cycling at smaller NHS premises is patchy at best. The NHS has a footprint that extends into most communities. This gives an opportunity to increase the visibility of cycling through the provision of cycle infrastructure and an uplift of staff who cycle.

Modern health care is a transport-intensive business that generates vast numbers of logistics related trips. My own medium-sized practice sees a steady flow of trips through the day. Scale this up and it is apparent that the NHS has great potential to influence the environment to promote cycling. A good model is the recent transformation in health logistics in Copenhagen,4 where a thorough review5 using logistics-planning principles led to measures including the use of a fleet of e-cargo bikes. These proved more efficient and reliable in city traffic and the service saw staff absences fall. ‘Cycling on prescription’ is a promising tool for health promotion suited to delivery through primary care, but clinicians will be understandably cautious in advocating cycling to the uninitiated or lapsed cyclist, particularly where local conditions remain challenging.

The NHS has an unparalleled opportunity to influence the conditions and experiences of cycling in the UK via a focused effort to promote cycling to its staff and logistic networks. As well as enhanced NHS efficiency and staff wellbeing, such efforts would enable and empower the wider population to cycle.

Footnotes

  • This article was first posted on BJGP Life on 24 September 2020: https://bjgplife.com/cycling

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2020

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Department for Transport
    (2020) Gear change A bold vision for cycling and walking, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/904146/gear-change-a-bold-vision-for-cycling-and-walking.pdf (accessed 7 Oct 2020).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Jones T,
    2. Chatterjee K,
    3. Spinney J,
    4. et al.
    (2016) Cycle BOOM Design for lifelong health and wellbeing Summary of key findings and recommendations (Oxford Brookes University, Oxford).
  3. 3.↵
    1. Clark B,
    2. Chatterjee K,
    3. Melia S
    (2016) Changes to commute mode: the role of life events, spatial context and environmental attitude. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 89, 89–105.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Denmark.dk
    A nation of cyclists. https://denmark.dk/people-and-culture/biking (accessed 7 Oct 2020).
  5. 5.↵
    1. Holm AL,
    2. Glümer C,
    3. Diderichsen F
    (2012) Health Impact Assessment of increased cycling to place of work or education in Copenhagen. BMJ Open 2, 4, e001135.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 70 (700)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 70, Issue 700
November 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
‘Cycling On Prescription’: a gear change or a wrong turn?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
‘Cycling On Prescription’: a gear change or a wrong turn?
Heather Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (700): 547. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X713237

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
‘Cycling On Prescription’: a gear change or a wrong turn?
Heather Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (700): 547. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X713237
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • ON YOUR BIKE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • The Last King of Scotland: using film to explore our understanding of professionalism
  • Medical education and war in Ukraine
  • Where I end and you begin: additional roles in British general practice
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242