Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

In harm’s way

Samar Razaq
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (700): 548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X713249
Samar Razaq
Burnham Health Centre, Burnham, Buckinghamshire. Email:
Roles: GP Partner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: samarrazaq@yahoo.co.uk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

‘The greatest confidence may be expressed in the intelligence and enthusiasm of the doctors of this country who will surely find a method of cure.’

(The Sunderland Herald, October, 1831).1

This optimistic declaration was made by a journalist of a local newspaper just as the UK was on the verge of an epidemic of Asiatic cholera. The gaze of a nation lifted towards the doctors and scientists of their time in the hope that the impending disaster could be averted.

As the country is gripped by fear of a new pandemic it places doctors and other healthcare workers once again in the spotlight. There is understandable fear among the public about the nature of the current pandemic and how it may affect them.

This fear, however, is shared by those on the frontline too. They carry the greater responsibility of having to ensure the safety of the public at large but also loved ones at home. Serious concerns have been raised about the availability of appropriate protective equipment for front-line staff. Consternation has been exacerbated by news of huge numbers of healthcare workers falling ill with tragic consequences in some.

WHERE DOES ONE TURN TO FOR GUIDANCE IN SUCH UNPRECEDENTED TIMES?

As the famous American polymath Carl Sagan (1934–1996), put it, ‘you have to know the past to understand the present.’ We stand on the shoulders of people who took many risks to provide us with the information and techniques that we rely on as we go to work every day.

A Dorset farmer Benjamin Jesty (1736–1816), a few decades before the more well-known Edward Jenner, rubbed matter from cowpox pustules onto the arms of his wife and children to protect them from smallpox. Jenner, famously, learnt that milkmaids infected with a milder virus called cowpox seemed immune to smallpox and carried out the more formal inoculation on the son of his gardener and then later his own child, which eventually led to the eradication of smallpox from the world.

Figure1

Vaccination: “Dr Jenner performing his first vaccination, 1796”. Oil painting by Ernest Board. Credit: Wellcome Collection.

The American virologist Jonas Salk (1914–1995), tested his polio vaccine on himself and his family, which, after a few setbacks, led to the plummeting of polio cases in the US. The Italian physician and zoologist Giovanni Battista Grassi (1854–1925), took his sense of duty to new heights as he infected himself with the eggs of the giant roundworm Ascaris lumbricoides. He later discovered its eggs in his faeces thus helping elucidate the lifecycle of the worms.

Scientists such as Vincent Zigas (1920–1983), and Daniel Carleton Gajdusek (1923–2008), spent months trekking through the remote regions of Papua New Guinea, observing and documenting cases of kuru, a rare spongiform encephalopathy, among the Fore people (the highest prevalence occurring during the 1950s and 1960s). Their work not only led to the discovery of ritualistic cannibalism being the cause of transmission of ‘the laughing death’, but also contributed towards elusive prions being identified as a causative agent of disease.

Marie Curie, who died from leukaemia in 1934, was just one of the early radiographers dying as a result of excessive exposure to radiation. These are just a few examples from among the annals of medical history where self-regard and preservation were disregarded for the benefit of others.

Recklessness is not, however, to be the desired default and an excuse for government inaction. It would be prudent not to follow the brash actions of Max Joseph von Pettenkofer (1818–1901). A German hygienist, Pettenkofer was a contemporary of the more renowned Robert Koch (1843–1910). Disagreeing with Koch’s idea that cholera was caused by bacteria, Pettenkofer asked the famous microbiologist to send him a flask containing a culture infected with the cholera bacillus. Himself being a proponent of the miasmatic theory of disease, Pettenkofer, in front of witnesses, proceeded to quaff the contents of the flask. To further disprove Koch, he followed it up with some bicarbonate of soda to counter Koch’s argument that stomach acid could render the bacteria ineffective. How he survived remains a mystery!

The optimism of the young journalist of The Sunderland Herald, and undoubtedly countless others, was misplaced. Within a few months of the article, cholera had swept through Sunderland and the rest of Europe and eventually into North America creating mass panic, death, and misery. Despite the best efforts of doctors and scientists a cure was not found. However, they did their best with what they could and probably saved countless lives.

So, as was in the past, and will be in the future, new names will come to the fore, selfless men and women putting themselves in harm’s way as they forge the path for those to come, to follow.

Footnotes

  • This article was first posted on BJGP Life on 21 August 2020; https://bjgplife.com/harm

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2020

REFERENCE

  1. 1.↵
    1. Dobson M
    (2015) Murderous contagion. A human history of disease (Quercus, London).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 70 (700)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 70, Issue 700
November 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In harm’s way
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
In harm’s way
Samar Razaq
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (700): 548. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X713249

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
In harm’s way
Samar Razaq
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (700): 548. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X713249
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • WHERE DOES ONE TURN TO FOR GUIDANCE IN SUCH UNPRECEDENTED TIMES?
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCE
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • COVID-19 vaccine availability: what are the side effects?
  • Each of our patients is unique: the limits of biomedical entities
  • How can general practice improve the mental health care experience of Black men in the UK?
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242