Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

RCGP Research Paper of the Year 2019: impact of COVID-19

Carolyn Chew-Graham
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (701): 602-603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X713777
Carolyn Chew-Graham
Manchester; Professor of General Practice Research, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire; Chair, Research Paper of the Year, RCGP. Email: @CizCG0
Roles: GP Principal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: c.a.chew-graham@keele.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The Research Paper of the Year (RPY), awarded by the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP), gives recognition to an individual or group of researchers who have undertaken and published an exceptional piece of research relating to general practice or primary care. The three categories are: Clinical Research; Health Services Research (including Implementation and Public Health); and Medical Education with relevance to primary care.

Papers are scored on the criteria of originality, impact, contribution to the reputation of general practice, scientific approach, and presentation.

CLINICAL RESEARCH — OVERALL WINNER

The overall winner of the RPY award 2019, from 52 submissions (down on last year, because of COVID-19?) was the winner of the Clinical Research category, reporting a trial led by Professor Christopher Butler, University of Oxford, titled ‘C-reactive protein testing to guide antibiotic prescribing for COPD exacerbations’.1

This study recruited 653 people with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and demonstrated that using a C-reactive protein finger-prick blood test resulted in 20% fewer people using antibiotics for COPD flare-ups. Importantly, this reduction in antibiotic use did not have a negative effect on patients’ recovery over the first 2 weeks after their initial consultation, or on their wellbeing or use of healthcare services over the following 6 months. Professor Butler says: ‘More than a million people in the UK have COPD, which is a lung condition associated with smoking and other environmental pollutants. People living with the condition often experience exacerbations, or flare-ups, and when this happens, three out of four are prescribed antibiotics. However, two-thirds of these flare-ups are not caused by bacterial infections and antibiotics often do not benefit patients. Safely reducing the use of antibiotics using this test may help in the battle against antibiotic resistance.’

With the ongoing pressure on primary care due to the COVID-19 pandemic, support for primary care clinicians in decision making about antibiotic prescribing would be very welcome.

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH — WINNER

The winner of category 2, Health Services Research, was led by Dr Ross McQueenie, University of Glasgow, and titled ‘Morbidity, mortality and missed appointments in healthcare: a national retrospective data linkage study’.2 Dr McQueenie says: ‘This was a study of linked general practice data — 15% of the Scottish population. We found that missing multiple GP appointments was a strong risk factor for greatly increased mortality. This was the case for patients with more long-term conditions, and this risk increased with the number of missed appointments. We were shocked to find that patients with long-term mental health conditions missing more than 2 appointments per year had more than 8 times the risk of all-cause mortality compared with those who had long-term mental health conditions but missed no GP appointments.’

This work was conducted before the COVID-19 pandemic and the move to remote consulting in general practice. What might be the impact of the increase in telephone and video consultations on this vulnerable population?

MEDICAL EDUCATION WITH RELEVANCE TO PRIMARY CARE — WINNER

The winning paper of category 3, Medical Education with relevance to primary care, was ‘Exploring reasons for differences in performance between UK and international medical graduates in the Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners Applied Knowledge Test: a cognitive interview study’,3 led by Dr Julie Pattinson, University of Lincoln. Dr Pattinson says: ‘We did this study because we do not understand why doctors who did medical training abroad, most from a BAME background, are less likely to pass the licensing exam for general practice. We interviewed GP trainees while they answered AKT questions. Cultural barriers for overseas trained doctors included differences in undergraduate experience, lack of familiarity with UK guidelines and language barriers. This study provides information about how we can practically support GP trainees, including overseas-trained doctors by highlighting and addressing gaps in training and experience.’

COVID-19 has added to the complexity of GP training and preparation for the MRCGP examination. We know that COVID-19 has impacted on GP workload and GP training. Trainees’ experiences during this time are likely to influence their career choices going forwards.

Highly commended

A study led by Dr Sharon Spooner in Manchester titled ‘The influence of training experiences on career intentions of the future GP workforce: a qualitative study of new GPs in England’,4 was ‘highly commended’ by Panel 3. Dr Spooner reflects: ‘These findings suggest that there were deficiencies in understanding business and management aspects of general practice, and that unacceptably heavy workloads in general practice motivate many trainees to limit their hours of GP work to achieve a more sustainable work-life balance.’

I hope that you will (re)read the winning papers and reflect on how general practice and general practice training have changed since March 2020, and how these studies are relevant to ourselves as clinicians, our practice, patients, and trainees. What will you do differently after reading the papers?

Acknowledgments

We are well supported by RCGP staff in Policy, Research and Campaigns. Thank you to everyone involved in the process for giving their time, particularly with all the competing demands on us.

Footnotes

  • This article was first posted on BJGP Life on 5 November 2020; https://bjgplife.com/RPY

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2020

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Butler C,
    2. Gillespie D,
    3. White P,
    4. et al.
    (2019) C-reactive protein testing to guide antibiotic prescribing for COPD exacerbations. N Engl J Med 381, 2, 111–120, https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1803185 (accessed 29 Oct 2020).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. McQueenie R,
    2. Ellis DA,
    3. McConnachie A,
    4. et al.
    (2019) Morbidity, mortality and missed appointments in healthcare: a national retrospective data linkage study. BMC Med 17, 1, 2, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30630493 (accessed 29 Oct 2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Pattinson J,
    2. Blow C,
    3. Sinha B,
    4. Siriwardena A
    (2019) Exploring reasons for differences in performance between UK and international medical graduates in the Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners Applied Knowledge Test: a cognitive interview study. BMJ Open 9, 5, e030341, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6549602 (accessed 29 Oct 2020).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Spooner S,
    2. Laverty L,
    3. Checkland K
    (2019) The influence of training experiences on career intentions of the future GP workforce: a qualitative study of new GPs in England. Br J Gen Pract, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X703877.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 70 (701)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 70, Issue 701
December 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
RCGP Research Paper of the Year 2019: impact of COVID-19
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
RCGP Research Paper of the Year 2019: impact of COVID-19
Carolyn Chew-Graham
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (701): 602-603. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X713777

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
RCGP Research Paper of the Year 2019: impact of COVID-19
Carolyn Chew-Graham
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (701): 602-603. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X713777
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • CLINICAL RESEARCH — OVERALL WINNER
    • HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH — WINNER
    • MEDICAL EDUCATION WITH RELEVANCE TO PRIMARY CARE — WINNER
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • The trolley problem, 2021 style
  • The MRCGP Recorded Consultation Assessment: time to drop 10 minutes as standard?
  • Three types of agnosia
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242