Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Oral Presentations

A qualitative evaluation of a prescribing e-learning package for general practice

Richard Knox, Nde-Eshimuni Salema, Naomi Clement, Brian Bell, Gill Gookey, Glen Swanick and Anthony Avery
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (suppl 1): bjgp20X711353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X711353
Richard Knox
University of Nottingham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nde-Eshimuni Salema
University of Nottingham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Naomi Clement
University of Nottingham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian Bell
University of Nottingham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gill Gookey
Rushcliffe CCG
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Glen Swanick
University of Nottingham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony Avery
University of Nottingham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

Background The GMC PRACtiCe study identified a 1 in 20 error rate in prescriptions issued in general practice and identified a need for further training in prescribing. As a result, an e-Learning prescribing package was designed and launched to healthcare professionals through the Royal College of General Practitioners in January 2014.

Aim This part of the study explored the longer-term impact on prescribing knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of practitioners completing the eLearning prescribing package.

Method On completion of the e-Learning package, participants were asked to indicate their willingness to be contacted for a telephone interview. Semi-structured interviews were conducted which were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis, aided by NVivo. Interviewees were invited to enter a prize draw to win Stockley’s Drug Interaction textbook (provided courtesy of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society).

Results Of the 120 participants who expressed an interest in being followed up for interview, seven prescribers were interviewed in 2014 and 2015. Reasons for completing the course were explored, and interviewees gave examples of changes made to their prescribing practice as a result of completing the e-Learning. This included the adoption of specific strategies to enhance safe practice, and enacting enhanced vigilance in key areas such as renal function monitoring. Some changes to the course content and presentation were also recommended.

Conclusion These interviews have highlighted the potential for using e-Learning for prescribing training and to achieve long-term changes in prescribing practice. However, further work is needed to generate substantive evidence of its impact on prescribing.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2020
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 70 (suppl 1)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 70, Issue suppl 1
June 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A qualitative evaluation of a prescribing e-learning package for general practice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A qualitative evaluation of a prescribing e-learning package for general practice
Richard Knox, Nde-Eshimuni Salema, Naomi Clement, Brian Bell, Gill Gookey, Glen Swanick, Anthony Avery
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (suppl 1): bjgp20X711353. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X711353

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
A qualitative evaluation of a prescribing e-learning package for general practice
Richard Knox, Nde-Eshimuni Salema, Naomi Clement, Brian Bell, Gill Gookey, Glen Swanick, Anthony Avery
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (suppl 1): bjgp20X711353. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X711353
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters

More in this TOC Section

  • Workforce Race Equality Standard survey in general practice: Lewisham 2019
  • Identification and management of frailty in English primary care: a qualitative study of national policy
  • Dermatology in primary care: an audit of the proportion of patients who present to general practice with a dermatological problem that could be self-managed
Show more Oral Presentations

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242