Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Poster Presentations

Blood tests in general practice: the use of routine data to characterise venous blood testing in North West London, 2016–2018

Marize Bakhet, Zia Ul-Haq, Tahereh Kamalati, Amanda Lucas, Azeem Majeed and Austen El-Osta
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (suppl 1): bjgp20X711605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X711605
Marize Bakhet
Imperial College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zia Ul-Haq
Imperial College Health Partners
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tahereh Kamalati
Imperial College Health Partners
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda Lucas
Imperial College Health Partners
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Azeem Majeed
Imperial College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Austen El-Osta
Imperial College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

Background Laboratory testing is an integral diagnostic tool, contributing to 70% of diagnoses in the NHS today. Its use has been steadily increasing despite estimates that ≤40% of blood tests ordered are unnecessary. Understanding blood-testing patterns is a fundamental step to tackling overuse.

Aim To characterise the volume, type, and per patient frequency (PPF) of venous blood testing reported in general practice in North West London, 2016–2018.

Method Following ethics clearance, aggregate data of blood tests reported in general practice in North West London between 2016 and 2018 were extracted from the Discover database. Non-venous blood test codes and codes not used within the designated time period were excluded. Codes reporting the same analyte were aggregated. Overall volume and PPF were calculated per analyte.

Results Three hundred and thirty-six individual analytes were reported and grouped into 35 recognised panels or groupings. Blood testing increased by 16.5% over the 3-year period. Full blood count, urea and electrolytes, liver function tests, and lipid profile accounted for 80.4% of all venous blood tests. Requests for HbA1c increased by 52.8% and non-HDL cholesterol by 148.7%, whereas glucose decreased by 13.3% and urea by 15.7%. The PPF remained unchanged over the 3-year period at 1.29 blood tests per person per year. The coagulation assay had the highest PPF at 3.0.

Conclusion Routine general practice data revealed important trends in blood testing. Trends uncovered can inform innovative and targeted solutions to reduce unnecessary blood testing.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2020
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 70 (suppl 1)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 70, Issue suppl 1
June 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Blood tests in general practice: the use of routine data to characterise venous blood testing in North West London, 2016–2018
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Blood tests in general practice: the use of routine data to characterise venous blood testing in North West London, 2016–2018
Marize Bakhet, Zia Ul-Haq, Tahereh Kamalati, Amanda Lucas, Azeem Majeed, Austen El-Osta
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (suppl 1): bjgp20X711605. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X711605

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Blood tests in general practice: the use of routine data to characterise venous blood testing in North West London, 2016–2018
Marize Bakhet, Zia Ul-Haq, Tahereh Kamalati, Amanda Lucas, Azeem Majeed, Austen El-Osta
British Journal of General Practice 2020; 70 (suppl 1): bjgp20X711605. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X711605
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters

More in this TOC Section

  • Cancer treatment decisions for people living with dementia: experiences of family carers
  • A case study evaluation of a community multidisciplinary team in South East England using a mixed-method approach
  • Decision making on clinical care choices including end-of-life decision making for older adults in an acute care setting
Show more Poster presentations

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242