Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editor’s Briefing

Legislating for the Future: Reshaping Laws

Euan Lawson
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (702): 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp21X714329
Euan Lawson
Acting Editor,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Reshaping primary care has been an abrupt, if not brutal, process in 2020 and the debates on the future direction of primary care roil. Multimorbidity is the norm and we should be mindful of the challenges of treatment burden.1 Living with a single chronic disease is hard enough and living with three or more can be all-consuming. Complexity may lie with the patient but shouldn’t be designed into the system. When people struggle to access care or attend appointments we must guard against personal blame. There is a single principle we need to underpin any service redesign if we want to avoid unintentionally deepening inequalities: the more complex the patient, the simpler the healthcare pathways that are needed.

On the 27 February 2021 it will be the 50th anniversary of the publication of Tudor Hart’s totemic article on the inverse care law.2 Reshaping primary care has multiple competing priorities and Tudor Hart, who was largely railing against marketisation, was aware that the NHS has functioned quite well without the profit motive. He knew its limitations as well: ‘Medical services are not the main determinant of mortality or morbidity; these depend most upon standards of nutrition, housing, working environment, and education, and the presence or absence of war.’

We are reshaping our own systems. In 2021 the BJGP will be providing early access to accepted manuscripts so that research doesn’t linger in a virtual drawer awaiting an issue. That should happen within a matter of days of acceptance. We have just accepted our first Registered Report and we hope to see more. And we are simplifying the pathway for our research to influence and shape primary care — in 2021 we will publish all research open access so it is available to everyone. We can all acknowledge the bruising experience of 2020 and the many challenges 2021 will offer us, but we should be optimistic about our capabilities.

Tudor Hart was plain in stating there was ‘no excuse for failure to match the greatest need with the highest standards of care.’2 The focus in the BJGP in 2021 will be on action and translation into practice to help with that matching of need and standards. We already have the tools to reduce inequalities in healthcare delivery — it doesn’t have to involve extra work and it is not a call for GPs to become public health doctors.

We will continue to publish research in all areas but we will be seeking articles that illuminate some neglected corners of practice. We have some ideas on these but, inevitably, because they are neglected we need your help to identify them.

Let us know, we want to hear from you!

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2021

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Rosbach M,
    2. Andersen JS
    (2017) Patient-experienced burden of treatment in patients with multimorbidity — a systematic review of qualitative data. PLoS One 12, 6, e0179916.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Tudor Hart J
    (1971) The inverse care law. Lancet 1, 7696, 405–412.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 71 (702)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 71, Issue 702
January 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Legislating for the Future: Reshaping Laws
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Legislating for the Future: Reshaping Laws
Euan Lawson
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (702): 3. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21X714329

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Legislating for the Future: Reshaping Laws
Euan Lawson
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (702): 3. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21X714329
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Highlights
  • Highlights
Show more Editor’s Briefing

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242