Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research

Management of non-urgent paediatric emergency department attendances by GPs: a retrospective observational study

Simon Leigh, Bimal Mehta, Lillian Dummer, Harriet Aird, Sinead McSorley, Venessa Oseyenum, Anna Cumbers, Mary Ryan, Karl Edwardson, Phil Johnston, Jude Robinson, Frans Coenen, David Taylor-Robinson, Louis W Niessen and Enitan D Carrol
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (702): e22-e30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X713885
Simon Leigh
Institute of Infection and Global Health;
Roles: PhD student
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bimal Mehta
Emergency Department;
Roles: Consultant in paediatric emergency medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lillian Dummer
School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool.
Roles: Medical student
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harriet Aird
School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool.
Roles: Medical student
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sinead McSorley
School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool.
Roles: Medical student
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Venessa Oseyenum
School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool.
Roles: Medical student
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Cumbers
Primary Care 24, Liverpool.
Roles: Business intelligence lead
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary Ryan
Primary Care 24, Liverpool.
Roles: Chief executive officer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karl Edwardson
Information Department, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool.
Roles: Deputy head of information
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Phil Johnston
Information Department, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool.
Roles: Informatics business development manager
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jude Robinson
School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.
Roles: Professor in health & wellbeing
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frans Coenen
Department of Computer Science;
Roles: Professor of computer science
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Taylor-Robinson
Department of Public Health and Policy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Louis W Niessen
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool.
Roles: Chair in health economics
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Enitan D Carrol
Institute of Infection and Global Health;
Roles: Professor of paediatric infection
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

eLetter submission guidelines

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Drawing comparisons between co-located primary care and emergency department services within adult and paediatric care
    Leila Mohammadi and Lauren Frame
    Published on: 10 January 2021
  • Antibiotic prescribing by GPs in the emergency department
    Kevork Hopayian
    Published on: 07 December 2020
  • Published on: (10 January 2021)
    Drawing comparisons between co-located primary care and emergency department services within adult and paediatric care
    • Leila Mohammadi, Medical Student, Keele University
    • Other Contributors:
      • Lauren Frame, Medical Student, Keele University

    We read with interest this paper by Leigh and colleagues,1 which sparked intrigue at the mention of limited supportive data from other studies. This enticed us to explore other papers regarding this topic in order to identify novel or unique features of the current study such that they could be reproduced. Upon doing so, we noticed that the common denominator appeared to be the differentiation between paediatric emergency department (ED) and adult ED services, with the former having notable beneficial outcomes compared to the limited findings from adult services.2-5

    On analysing the literature referenced from the current study we found that those conducted in a general ED setting had minimal benefit from the adjunct of a GP to the service. This was reinforced by our exploration of multiple studies that specifically focused on children’s ED services.6-9 These demonstrated significant increases in cost effectiveness and efficiency including reduced length of stay and admission rates. We recognise that this may result from parents being more likely to bring their child to the ED with non-urgent ailments.10  This coincides with findings from the current study that costs were reduced by almost 60% for children under 6 months.

    Consideration should be given to the time frame of GP availability. The current study explicitly specifies the time period as 2pm-10pm. By and large, no mention is made of this in...

    Show More

    We read with interest this paper by Leigh and colleagues,1 which sparked intrigue at the mention of limited supportive data from other studies. This enticed us to explore other papers regarding this topic in order to identify novel or unique features of the current study such that they could be reproduced. Upon doing so, we noticed that the common denominator appeared to be the differentiation between paediatric emergency department (ED) and adult ED services, with the former having notable beneficial outcomes compared to the limited findings from adult services.2-5

    On analysing the literature referenced from the current study we found that those conducted in a general ED setting had minimal benefit from the adjunct of a GP to the service. This was reinforced by our exploration of multiple studies that specifically focused on children’s ED services.6-9 These demonstrated significant increases in cost effectiveness and efficiency including reduced length of stay and admission rates. We recognise that this may result from parents being more likely to bring their child to the ED with non-urgent ailments.10  This coincides with findings from the current study that costs were reduced by almost 60% for children under 6 months.

    Consideration should be given to the time frame of GP availability. The current study explicitly specifies the time period as 2pm-10pm. By and large, no mention is made of this in other articles. Similarly, other papers reference walk-in centres without defining the associated personnel. Should other papers encompass these finer details, it could allow further and more precise parallels to be drawn, thus uncovering the salient features needed to improve integration of primary care into emergency medicine.

    We propose that differences in patient age groups may explain why the original study reported incongruences with previous literature. Recognition of this fact as a possible explanation could influence future research and aid implementation of primary care resources in emergency medicine. To confirm this potential association, larger scale research into co-located primary care and ED services would be required with evaluation of the presence of successful programmes run within paediatric EDs.

    References
    1.  Leigh S, Mehta B, Dummer L et al. Management of non-urgent paediatric emergency department attendances by GPs: a retrospective observational study. Br J Gen Pract 2020; 71(702):e22-e30.
    2.  Khangura J, Flodgren G, Perera R, Rowe B, Shepperd S. Primary care professionals providing non-urgent care in hospital emergency departments. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012.
    3.  Cooper A, Davies F, Edwards M et al. The impact of general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments: a rapid realist review. BMJ Open 2019; 9(4):e024501.
    4.  Salisbury C, Hollinghurst S, Montgomery A et al. The impact of co-located NHS walk-in centres on emergency departments. Emerg Med J 2007; 24(4):265-269.
    5.  Ramlakhan S, Mason S, O'Keeffe C, Ramtahal A, Ablard S. Primary care services located with EDs: a review of effectiveness. Emerg Med J 2016; 33(7):495-503.
    6.  Kmietowicz Z. Children seen by GP in emergency department less likely to be admitted, study found. BMJ 2017; j4644.
    7.  McCarron M, Burgess K, Gibbs S. G339(P) An evaluation of primary care streaming in a tertiary paediatric emergency department. Arch Dis Child 2019; 104:A138-A139.
    8.  Gritz A, Sen A, Hiles S, Mackenzie G, Blair M. G241(P) More under-fives now seen in urgent care centre than A&E- should we shift our focus? Arch Dis Child 2016;101(Suppl 1):A132.1-A132.
    9.  Gnani S, Morton S, Ramzan F et al. Healthcare use among preschool children attending GP-led urgent care centres: a descriptive, observational study. BMJ Open 2016; 6(6):e010672.
    10.  Ogilvie S, Hopgood K, Higginson I, Ives A, Smith J. Why do parents use the emergency department for minor injury and illness? A cross-sectional questionnaire. JRSM Open  2016;7(3):205427041562369.

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (7 December 2020)
    Antibiotic prescribing by GPs in the emergency department
    • Kevork Hopayian, Professor University of Nicosia Medical School, Sessional GP, Suffolk, University of Nicosia Medical School
    The authors are to be congratulated on having the inspiration to use the “natural experiment” of patients being diverted to the emergency department (ED) when a GP was not available. However, I wonder if, first, this is typical of most GP in ED services and second, if missing data may have reduced the reliability of the findings.
     
    The comparator group were patients referred to the ED when a GP was not available. There were 5737 patients in the ED group and 8707 in the GP group, meaning that the GP service was unavailable for 39.7% of presentations. That is a very large proportion. How does it compare with services elsewhere in the country? I suspect that this service is not typical of the rest of the country so the generalisability of the findings are in doubt.
     
    Eighteen per cent of ED group were excluded from the study because of missing data while only 3% of GP group were. The missing data may have nothing to do with the quality of care and might just represent different patterns of work and pressure but even so, despite adjustment for confounders, this huge differential exclusion reduces the reliability of comparing outcomes of the two services.
     
    Competing Interests: None declared.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 71 (702)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 71, Issue 702
January 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Management of non-urgent paediatric emergency department attendances by GPs: a retrospective observational study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Management of non-urgent paediatric emergency department attendances by GPs: a retrospective observational study
Simon Leigh, Bimal Mehta, Lillian Dummer, Harriet Aird, Sinead McSorley, Venessa Oseyenum, Anna Cumbers, Mary Ryan, Karl Edwardson, Phil Johnston, Jude Robinson, Frans Coenen, David Taylor-Robinson, Louis W Niessen, Enitan D Carrol
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (702): e22-e30. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X713885

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Management of non-urgent paediatric emergency department attendances by GPs: a retrospective observational study
Simon Leigh, Bimal Mehta, Lillian Dummer, Harriet Aird, Sinead McSorley, Venessa Oseyenum, Anna Cumbers, Mary Ryan, Karl Edwardson, Phil Johnston, Jude Robinson, Frans Coenen, David Taylor-Robinson, Louis W Niessen, Enitan D Carrol
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (702): e22-e30. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X713885
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHOD
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • antibiotics
  • cost-effectiveness
  • emergency care
  • paediatrics
  • primary care

More in this TOC Section

  • Attitudes of Trans Men and Non-binary People to UK Cervical Screening
  • GPs’ and patients’ views on the value of diagnosing anxiety disorders in primary care: a qualitative interview study
  • The experience of implementing and delivering group consultations in UK general practice
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242