Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research

Association of multimorbidity with higher levels of urinary incontinence: a cross-sectional study of 23 089 individuals aged ≥15 years residing in Spain

Louis Jacob, Guillermo Felipe López-Sánchez, Hans Oh, Jae Il Shin, Igor Grabovac, Pinar Soysal, Petre Cristian Ilie, Nicola Veronese, Ai Koyanagi and Lee Smith
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (702): e71-e77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X713921
Louis Jacob
Faculty of Medicine, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
Roles: Doctor, public health researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guillermo Felipe López-Sánchez
Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Roles: Doctor, public health researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans Oh
University of Southern California, Suzanne Dworak Peck School of Social Work, Los Angeles, US.
Roles: Doctor, public health researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jae Il Shin
Department of Pediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Roles: Professor, public health researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Igor Grabovac
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Centre for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Roles: Doctor, public health researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pinar Soysal
Department of Geriatric Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Roles: Doctor, public health researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Petre Cristian Ilie
Research and Innovation Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King’s Lynn, UK.
Roles: Doctor, public health researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicola Veronese
Geriatric Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Roles: Doctor, public health researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ai Koyanagi
ICREA, Barcelona, Spain.
Roles: Professor, public health researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lee Smith
The Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Roles: Professor, public health researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background One can assume a relatively high prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) in people with multimorbidity. However, literature in this area is scarce. There is a need for further robust research to aid GPs to identify patients at a particular risk for UI, and to initiate the early treatment and multidisciplinary management of this condition.

Aim To examine the association between multimorbidity and UI in 23 089 individuals aged ≥15 years and residing in Spain.

Design and setting This study used data from the Spanish National Health Survey 2017, a cross-sectional sample of 23 089 participants aged ≥15 years residing in Spain (54.1% female; mean [standard deviation] age = 53.4 [18.9] years).

Method UI and 30 other physical and mental chronic conditions were self-reported. Multimorbidity was defined as the presence of ≥2 physical and/or mental chronic conditions (excluding UI). Control variables included sex, age, marital status, education, smoking, and alcohol consumption. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between multimorbidity and UI.

Results The prevalence of UI was 5.9% in this sample. UI was more frequent in the presence than in the absence of each one of the 30 chronic conditions (P<0.001). The proportion of people with UI was also higher in the multimorbidity than in the no-multimorbidity group (9.8% versus 0.7%, P<0.001). After adjusting for several potential confounders (that is, sex, age, marital status, education, smoking, and alcohol), there was a significant and positive relationship between multimorbidity and UI (odds ratio = 5.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.89 to 6.59, P<0.001).

Conclusion In this large sample of Spanish individuals aged ≥15 years, suffering from multimorbidity was associated with a significantly higher level of UI.

  • cross-sectional studies
  • logistic models
  • multimorbidity
  • Spain
  • urinary incontinence

INTRODUCTION

According to the International Continence Society, urinary incontinence (UI) is defined as ‘the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine’.1 The global prevalence of UI is 3–17% in females and 3–11% in males, with varying prevalence across countries.2 Although it is most common in older adults, the condition can affect people of all ages. For example, in a study carried out in nulliparous females, the incidence of UI increased from 3% in those aged 25–34 years to 7% in those aged 55–64 years.3 Moreover, another study found that the prevalence of moderate–severe UI in community-dwelling females was 7%, 17%, 23%, and 32% in those aged 20–39, 40–49, 60–79, and ≥80 years, respectively.4 In studies carried out on males and females, the prevalence of UI was found to be between 11–34% in males aged >65 years, and about twice that frequency in females, proving that UI is more common in females than males.5 UI is associated with impaired quality of life6 and imposes a tremendous economic burden on national health services/systems.7

Multimorbidity is defined as the simultaneous occurrence of ≥2 chronic diseases in one person and can include both physical and mental health complications. It has been found that in developed countries >40% of the population have ≥1 chronic condition, and approximately 25% have >1 condition (that is, multimorbidity).8 Similar to UI, multimorbidity is most common among older adults, but can affect people of all ages.9 Multimorbidity is a public health concern as it has been shown to be associated with high mortality,10 reduced functional status,11 and increased use of both inpatient and ambulatory health care.12,13 Multimorbidity is more difficult to manage than singular conditions, and requires close coordination across specialists and generalists.

Owing to a multifactorial aetiology behind UI and that cognitive, neurological, muscular, and urological systems must be robust to maintain continence,14,15 one can assume a relatively high prevalence of UI in people with multimorbidity. However, literature in this area is scarce. In one study of 622 Brazilian females aged ≥50 years it was found that approximately two-thirds of females suffering from UI reported multimorbidity.16 The authors of the present study are not aware of any other literature on this topic. Clearly there is a need for further research investigating the association between multimorbidity and UI in population-based samples, among people of multiple ages and from other countries, to establish a better understanding of this topic as well as the underlying risk factors for UI. Consequently, this would help GPs to identify patients at particular risk for UI, and to initiate the early treatment and multidisciplinary management of this condition. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine the association between multimorbidity and UI in 23 089 individuals aged ≥15 years residing in Spain.

Understanding multimorbidity and urinary incontinence (UI) is critical for medical practitioners. This study found that UI was more frequent in the presence than in the absence of chronic conditions. Those with multimorbidity were five times more likely to suffer from UI. GPs should be aware that those with multimorbidity are at an increased risk of UI.

How this fits in

METHOD

The survey

Data from the Spanish National Health Survey 2017 were analysed. This survey was undertaken in Spain between October 2016 and October 2017. Details of the survey method have been already published.17 For the data collection, a stratified three-stage sampling was used in which the census sections were first considered, followed by the family dwellings, and then an individual aged ≥15 years was selected within each dwelling. The sections were selected within each stratum with probability proportional to their size. After arrangement by the size of the dwellings, the dwellings in each section were selected with equal probability by systematic sampling. This procedure leads to self-weighting samples in each stratum. For the selection of the person who had to complete the adult questionnaire, the random Kish method was used, which assigns equal probability to all adults in the household. The sample consisted of 23 089 individuals aged 15–103 years residing in Spain. There were no exclusion criteria in the present study, and the overall sample was included in the statistical analyses. The method of data collection used was computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI), conducted in the homes of the selected participants. The interviewers, previously trained, completed the questionnaires with the information provided by the participants. All of them signed an informed consent form before responding to the survey questions.

Multimorbidity (independent variable)

Multimorbidity was defined as the presence of ≥2 chronic conditions (excluding UI). Those who answered affirmatively to the yes/no question ‘Have you ever been diagnosed with ‘chronic condition’?’ were considered to have the specific chronic condition. All conditions except obesity were assessed with this question. Previous research has confirmed the validity and high accuracy of self-reported diagnosis of chronic conditions.18,19 Using the standard World Health Organization (WHO) definition, obesity was defined as body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2, and BMI <30 kg/m2 was considered no obesity.20 BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared based on self-reported weight and height. The chronic conditions that were included are listed in Box 1 classified following the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11), of the WHO.

Diseases of the circulatory systemHypertension
Myocardial infarction
Angina pectoris and other coronary diseases
Other cardiac diseases
Varicose veins of lower extremities
Diseases of the nervous systemStroke
Migraine and other frequent headaches
Diseases of the musculoskeletal system or connective tissueOsteoarthritis
Chronic neck pain
Chronic low back pain
Osteoporosis
Diseases of the immune systemChronic allergy (excluding allergic asthma)
Diseases of the respiratory systemAsthma (including allergic asthma)
Chronic bronchitis, emphysema, or COPD
Diseases of the digestive systemLiver cirrhosis and other hepatic disorders
Peptic ulcer disease
Chronic constipation
Haemorrhoids
Diseases of the genitourinary systemRenal disease
Diseases of the visual systemCataract
Diseases of the skinChronic skin disease
Mental, behavioural, or neurodevelopmental disordersDepression
Anxiety disorder
Other psychiatric disorders
NeoplasmsCancer
Endocrine, nutritional, or metabolic diseasesThyroid disease
Diabetes
Hypercholesterolaemia
Obesity
Injury, poisoning, or certain other consequences of external causesPermanent injuries caused by an accident
  • COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Box 1.

List of chronic conditions classified following the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11)21

UI (dependent variable)

Those who answered affirmatively to the question ‘Have you ever been diagnosed with UI?’ were considered to have UI. Previous research has confirmed the validity and high accuracy of self-reported diagnosis of UI.22

Control variables

The selection of the control variables was based on previous studies showing that these factors are associated with both the independent23–27 and the dependent variable.28–31 Sociodemographic variables included sex, age, marital status, and education. Marital status was categorised as married and not married (single/widowed/divorced/separated). Education was based on the highest educational level achieved and was categorised as ≤primary, secondary, and ≥tertiary. Smoking status was self-reported and categorised as never, past, and current smoking. Alcohol consumption in the past 12 months was self-reported and categorised as yes (any) and no (none).

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was performed with R 3.5.2 (the R Foundation, https://www.r-project.org). All the analyses were carried out taking into account the cross-sectional design of the survey, using appropriate tests for this design. Differences in the sample characteristics (by multimorbidity status) and in the prevalence of UI (by chronic condition and multimorbidity status) were assessed by χ2 tests for all variables except age (t-test). The association between multimorbidity (independent variable) and UI (dependent variable) was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Independent variables were included in the models as categorical variables with the exception of age, which was included as a continuous variable. UI was included in the model as dichotomous variable. Models were adjusted for basic sociodemographic and behavioral variables (that is, sex, age, marital status, education, smoking, alcohol).23–31 There were missing data for the following variables only: marital status (n = 39, 0.17%), smoking (n = 22, 0.10%), alcohol consumption (n = 26, 0.11%), and obesity (n = 1070, 4.63%). Complete-case analysis was carried out. Results from the logistic regression analyses are presented as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Confidence intervals and P-values were corrected using the Benjamini–Yekutieli and the Benjamini–Hochberg procedures to control the false discovery rate. The level of statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

RESULTS

There were 23 089 individuals aged ≥15 years included in this cross-sectional study (54.1% of females; mean (standard deviation) age = 53.4 (18.9) years; Table 1). The proportion of females, married individuals, people with ≤primary education, past smokers, and people with no alcohol consumption was more frequent in the multimorbidity than in the no-multimorbidity group, whereas people with multimorbidity were older than those without multimorbidity. The prevalence of UI was 5.9% in this sample. UI was more frequent in the presence than in the absence of each one of the 30 chronic conditions (P<0.001; Figure 1). The proportion of people with UI was also higher in the multimorbidity than in the no-multimorbidity group (9.8% versus 0.7%, P<0.001). The results of the regression analysis are displayed in Table 2. After adjusting for several potential confounders (that is, sex, age, marital status, education, smoking, alcohol), there was a significant and positive relationship between multimorbidity and UI (odds ratio = 5.02, CI = 3.89 to 6.59 , P<0.001).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Sample characteristics (overall and by multimorbidity status)a

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Prevalence of urinary incontinence by chronic condition and multimorbidity.a

aMultimorbidity was defined as the presence of two or more chronic conditions. Chronic conditions are listed in Box 1. Urinary incontinence and other chronic conditions except obesity were assessed with questions with ‘yes’ and ‘no’ options. BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared based on self-reported weight and height. Using the standard WHO definition, obesity was defined as BMI ≥30 kg/m2, and BMI <30 kg/-m2 was considered no obesity. Urinary incontinence was more frequent in the presence than in the absence of each one of the 30 chronic conditions or multimorbidity.P -values were based on χ2 tests and were corrected using the Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment method. AllP -values were lower than 0.001 (not displayed in the figure). BMI = body mass index. COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. WHO = World Health Organization.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Association between multimorbidity (independent variable) and urinary incontinence (dependent variable) in adults residing in Spaina

DISCUSSION

Summary

In this large sample of the Spanish population, it was found that the prevalence of UI was 5.9%. Moreover, those with multimorbidity were five times more likely to suffer from UI. These findings support previous literature where another study showed in a small sample of Brazilian females that approximately two-thirds of those with UI suffered from multimorbidity.16 The present study adds to this literature by showing that such an association exists in a large sample of males and females residing in Spain.

Strengths and limitations

The present study investigated the relationship between multimorbidity and UI in a large sample of males and females. However, the present findings must be interpreted in light of the study limitations. Both UI and all chronic conditions were self-reported, potentially introducing bias. The stem question asked was ‘Have you ever been diagnosed with “chronic condition”?’ Owing to the wording of the question it is possible that a person used to have a specific chronic condition but no longer does, potentially inflating the prevalence of multimorbidity observed in this study. Furthermore, participants were only asked whether they suffered from UI and not the type of UI; different types of UI may have different associations with multimorbidity, and further research is now required to address this question. Data on duration of chronic conditions were not available, thus potentially introducing some bias into analyses. Moreover, there was no information on parity, although parity is a well known risk factor for UI in females. Data on those who received the invitation to participate in the survey and did not respond are not available. Moreover, there are no recent available national statistics to compare the present sample to. Therefore, the representativeness of the present sample is not known. Finally, the cross-sectional nature of the study means the direction of observed associations is not known. Therefore, future longitudinal studies are needed to clarify the direction of causality. Nevertheless, the mere coexisting presence of UI with chronic conditions and multimorbidity highlights an important health priority and informs targeted intervention.

Comparison with existing literature

In this large sample of the Spanish population, the prevalence of UI was 5.9% and the prevalence of multimorbidity was 56.9%. This prevalence is comparable with existing literature. For example, a systematic review assessed the global prevalence of UI in different samples of adults from Europe, the United States, Asia, and Africa, obtaining varying UI prevalence estimates with ranges of 1.8–30.5% in European populations, 1.7–36.4% in US populations, and 1.5–15.2% in Asian populations, with prevalence dependent on age and sex.7 Regarding the prevalence of multimorbidity, another systematic review including 70 057 611 patients in 12 countries found a multimorbidity prevalence ranging from 12.9–95.1%.32

There are several plausible mechanisms that likely increase risk of UI for those suffering from multimorbidity. First, changes in age-related immune functions, hormonal changes, and increasing incidence of comorbid diseases may facilitate urinary tract infections that can result in UI.33 Second, poor sleep quality34 is associated with nocturia (waking from sleep to void). Third, multimorbidity is associated with mild cognitive impairment35,36 and with cognitive decline37 and, in turn, those with a dementia diagnosis (a condition not available to the present study) have approximately three times the rate of diagnosis of UI.38 Fourth, another possible mechanism is polypharmacy (often defined as the prescription of ≥5 different drugs), as polypharmacy is strongly associated with multimorbidity,39 while the frequency of polypharmacy is high among patients attending a specialist outpatient department for UI.40 Fifth, sarcopenia could also have a mediating role in the association between multimorbidity and UI, as previous studies have found associations of sarcopenia with both multimorbidity41 and UI.42 Sixth, another important factor is physical activity, as less physical activity is associated with a higher prevalence of multimorbidity43 and UI.44

Implications for practice

Understanding multimorbidity and UI is critical for medical practitioners. First, in managing multimorbidity, UI can easily be overlooked or eclipsed by other more pressing complaints, especially if patients feel too embarrassed to mention the topic. In this case, it is incumbent upon the medical provider to elicit this information from the patient. These findings suggest that UI should become a standard feature of clinical interviews, given that treatment for UI could involve a number of interventions (for example, pelvic floor exercises, medications, surgery, medical devices) that must figure into already complicated treatment plans for patients with multimorbidity. Second, UI is associated with significant impairment in occupational, social, sexual, and recreational functioning. That is, daily activities may be constrained by geographic proximity to bathrooms. Patients with multimorbidity may already face significant impairment from multiple underlying conditions, and often treatment for these conditions aims to maximise overall functioning and independent living. The presence of UI can interfere with this treatment aim. Third, UI is associated with falls and other injuries that are especially concerning if occurring among people with multimorbidity, given that they are already physically vulnerable, and may likely suffer more serious injuries or take longer to recover. Taking that into account, addressing UI may help prevent further injury.

In conclusion, in this large sample of Spanish individuals aged ≥15 years, suffering from multimorbidity was associated with a significantly higher increased risk of UI. Interventions specifically designed for those with multimorbidity to reduce or manage co-occurring UI are required. Finally, urologists and GPs should be aware that those with multimorbidity are at an increased risk of UI.

Notes

Funding

None.

Ethical approval

This study obtained ethical approval by the Spanish Statistics Institute (ENS-2017) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Provenance

Freely submitted; externally peer reviewed.

Competing interests

The authors have confirmed no competing interests.

Discuss this article

Contribute and read comments about this article: bjgp.org/letters

  • Received May 11, 2020.
  • Revision requested June 1, 2020.
  • Accepted June 23, 2020.
  • © The Authors
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/).

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Abrams P,
    2. Cardozo L,
    3. Fall M,
    4. et al.
    (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub–committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21, 2, 167–178.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Nitti VW
    (2001) The prevalence of urinary incontinence. Rev Urol 3, Suppl 1, S2–S6.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Othman JA,
    2. Åkervall S,
    3. Milsom I,
    4. Gyhagen M
    (2017) Urinary incontinence in nulliparous women aged 25–64 years: a national survey. Am J Obstet Gynecol 216, 2, 149.e1–149.e11.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Nygaard I,
    2. Barber MD,
    3. Burgio KL,
    4. et al.
    (2008) Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 300, 11, 1311–1316.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Buckley BS,
    2. Lapitan MCM
    (2010) Prevalence of urinary incontinence in men, women, and children — current evidence: findings of the Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence. Urology 76, 2, 265–270.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Coyne KS,
    2. Kvasz M,
    3. Ireland AM,
    4. et al.
    (2012) Urinary incontinence and its relationship to mental health and health-related quality of life in men and women in Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Eur Urol 61, 1, 88–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Milsom I,
    2. Coyne KS,
    3. Nicholson S,
    4. et al.
    (2014) Global prevalence and economic burden of urgency urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Eur Urol 65, 1, 79–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Barnett K,
    2. Mercer SW,
    3. Norbury M,
    4. et al.
    (2012) Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 380, 9836, 37–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. World Health Organization
    (2016) Multimorbidity: technical series on safer primary care (WHO, Geneva) https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/252275/9789241511650-eng.pdf;sequence=1 (accessed 14 Sep 2020).
  10. 10.↵
    1. Gijsen R,
    2. Hoeymans N,
    3. Schellevis FG,
    4. et al.
    (2001) Causes and consequences of comorbidity: a review. J Clin Epidemiol 54, 7, 661–674.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Kadam UT,
    2. Croft PR,
    3. North Staffordshire GP Consortium Group
    (2007) Clinical multimorbidity and physical function in older adults: a record and health status linkage study in general practice. Fam Pract 24, 5, 412–419.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Salisbury C,
    2. Johnson L,
    3. Purdy S,
    4. et al.
    (2011) Epidemiology and impact of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract doi:10.3399/bjgp11X548929.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    1. Wolff JL,
    2. Starfield B,
    3. Anderson G
    (2002) Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 162, 20, 2269–2276.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Klingler HC,
    2. Heidler H,
    3. Madersbacher H,
    4. Primus G
    (2009) Nocturia: an Austrian study on the multifactorial etiology of this symptom. Neurourol Urodyn 28, 5, 427–431.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. McGrother C,
    2. Resnick M,
    3. Yalla SV,
    4. et al.
    (1998) Epidemiology and etiology of urinary incontinence in the elderly. World J Urol 16, Suppl 1, S3–S9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Reigota RB,
    2. Pedro AO,
    3. de Souza Santos Machado V,
    4. et al.
    (2016) Prevalence of urinary incontinence and its association with multimorbidity in women aged 50 years or older: a population–based study. Neurourol Urodyn 35, 1, 62–68.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad & Instituto Nacional de Estadística
    [Spanish National Health Survey 2017: Methodology]. (In Spanish.), https://www.mscbs.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/encuestaNacional/encuestaNac2017/ENSE17_Metodologia.pdf (accessed 14 Sep 2020).
  18. 18.↵
    1. Martin LM,
    2. Leff M,
    3. Calonge N,
    4. et al.
    (2000) Validation of self-reported chronic conditions and health services in a managed care population. Am J Prev Med 18, 215–218.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Bergmann MM,
    2. Byers T,
    3. Freedman DS,
    4. Mokdad A
    (1998) Validity of self-reported diagnoses leading to hospitalization: a comparison of self-reports with hospital records in a prospective study of American adults. Am J Epidemiol 147, 10, 969–977.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. World Health Organization
    (2020) Body mass index — BMI (WHO, Geneva) http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/nutrition/a-healthy-lifestyle/body-mass-index-bmi (accessed 14 Sep 2020).
  21. 21.↵
    1. World Health Organization
    (2018) International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11) (WHO, Geneva) https://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/ (accessed 9 Nov 2020).
  22. 22.↵
    1. Bradley CS,
    2. Brown JS,
    3. Van Den Eeden SK,
    4. et al.
    (2011) Urinary incontinence self-report questions: reproducibility and agreement with bladder diary. Int Urogynecol J 22, 12, 1565–1571.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Alimohammadian M,
    2. Majidi A,
    3. Yaseri M,
    4. et al.
    (2017) Multimorbidity as an important issue among women: results of a gender difference investigation in a large population-based cross-sectional study in West Asia. BMJ Open 7, 5, e013548.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.
    1. Lenzi J,
    2. Avaldi VM,
    3. Rucci P,
    4. et al.
    (2016) Burden of multimorbidity in relation to age, gender and immigrant status: a cross-sectional study based on administrative data. BMJ Open 6, 12, e012812.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.
    1. Nagel G,
    2. Peter R,
    3. Braig S,
    4. et al.
    (2008) The impact of education on risk factors and the occurrence of multimorbidity in the EPIC-Heidelberg cohort. BMC Public Health 8, 1, 384.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.
    1. Fortin M,
    2. Haggerty J,
    3. Almirall J,
    4. et al.
    (2014) Lifestyle factors and multimorbidity: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health 14, 1, 686.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Singer L,
    2. Green M,
    3. Rowe F,
    4. et al.
    (2019) Social determinants of multimorbidity and multiple functional limitations among the ageing population of England, 2002–2015. SSM Popul Health 8, 100413.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Teunissen TAM,
    2. van den Bosch WJHM,
    3. van den Hoogen HJM,
    4. Lagro-Janssen ALM
    (2004) Prevalence of urinary, fecal and double incontinence in the elderly living at home. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15, 1, 10–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.
    1. Kirss F,
    2. Lang K,
    3. Toompere K,
    4. Veerus P
    (2013) Prevalence and risk factors of urinary incontinence among Estonian postmenopausal women. Springerplus 2, 1, 524.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.
    1. Bump RC,
    2. McClish DK
    (1992) Cigarette smoking and urinary incontinence in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 167, 5, 1213–1218.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Lee AH,
    2. Hirayama F
    (2011) Is alcohol consumption associated with male urinary incontinence? Low Urin Tract Symptoms 3, 1, 19–24.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Violan C,
    2. Foguet-Boreu Q,
    3. Flores-Mateo G,
    4. et al.
    (2014) Prevalence, determinants and patterns of multimorbidity in primary care: a systematic review of observational studies. PloS One 9, 7, e102149.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Marques LPJ,
    2. Flores JT,
    3. de Oliveira Barros Junior O,
    4. et al.
    (2012) Epidemiological and clinical aspects of urinary tract infection in community-dwelling elderly women. Braz J Infect Dis 16, 5, 436–441.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Fung CH,
    2. Vaughan CP,
    3. Markland AD,
    4. et al.
    (2017) Nocturia is associated with poor sleep quality among older women in the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Am Geriatr Soc 65, 11, 2502–2509.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    1. Koyanagi A,
    2. Lara E,
    3. Stubbs B,
    4. et al.
    (2018) Chronic physical conditions, multimorbidity, and mild cognitive impairment in low–and middle–income countries. J Am Geriatr Soc 66, 4, 721–727.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    1. Vassilaki M,
    2. Aakre JA,
    3. Cha RH,
    4. et al.
    (2015) Multimorbidity and risk of mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 63, 9, 1783–1790.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Wei MY,
    2. Levine DA,
    3. Zahodne LB,
    4. et al.
    (2019) Multimorbidity and cognitive decline over 14 years in older Americans. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 75, 6, 1206–1213.
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.↵
    1. Grant RL,
    2. Drennan VM,
    3. Rait G,
    4. et al.
    (2013) First diagnosis and management of incontinence in older people with and without dementia in primary care: a cohort study using The Health Improvement Network primary care database. PLoS Med 10, 8, e1001505.
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.↵
    1. Kostev K,
    2. Jacob L
    (2018) Multimorbidity and polypharmacy among elderly people followed in general practices in Germany. Eur J Intern Med 55, 66–68.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.↵
    1. Schneidinger CS,
    2. Umek W,
    3. Böhmdorfer B
    (2016) The problem of polypharmacy in female patients with overactive bladders — cross-sectional study in a specialist outpatient department. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 76, 12, 1318–1324.
    OpenUrl
  41. 41.↵
    1. Dodds RM,
    2. Granic A,
    3. Robinson SM,
    4. Sayer AA
    (2019) Sarcopenia, long–term conditions, and multimorbidity: findings from UK Biobank participants. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 11, 1, 62–68.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.↵
    1. Erdogan T,
    2. Bahat G,
    3. Kilic C,
    4. et al.
    (2019) The relationship between sarcopenia and urinary incontinence. Eur Geriatr Med 10, 6, 923–929.
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    1. Cimarras-Otal C,
    2. Calderón-Larrañaga A,
    3. Poblador-Plou B,
    4. et al.
    (2014) Association between physical activity, multimorbidity, self-rated health and functional limitation in the Spanish population. BMC Public Health 14, 1, 1170.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Kikuchi A,
    2. Niu K,
    3. Ikeda Y,
    4. et al.
    (2007) Association between physical activity and urinary incontinence in a community-based elderly population aged 70 years and over. Eur Urol 52, 3, 868–875.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 71 (702)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 71, Issue 702
January 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Association of multimorbidity with higher levels of urinary incontinence: a cross-sectional study of 23 089 individuals aged ≥15 years residing in Spain
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Association of multimorbidity with higher levels of urinary incontinence: a cross-sectional study of 23 089 individuals aged ≥15 years residing in Spain
Louis Jacob, Guillermo Felipe López-Sánchez, Hans Oh, Jae Il Shin, Igor Grabovac, Pinar Soysal, Petre Cristian Ilie, Nicola Veronese, Ai Koyanagi, Lee Smith
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (702): e71-e77. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X713921

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Association of multimorbidity with higher levels of urinary incontinence: a cross-sectional study of 23 089 individuals aged ≥15 years residing in Spain
Louis Jacob, Guillermo Felipe López-Sánchez, Hans Oh, Jae Il Shin, Igor Grabovac, Pinar Soysal, Petre Cristian Ilie, Nicola Veronese, Ai Koyanagi, Lee Smith
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (702): e71-e77. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X713921
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHOD
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • cross-sectional studies
  • logistic models
  • multimorbidity
  • Spain
  • urinary incontinence

More in this TOC Section

  • The impact of remote care approaches on continuity in primary care: a mixed-studies systematic review
  • Performance of ethnic minority versus White doctors in the MRCGP assessment 2016–2021: a cross-sectional study
  • Trends in the registration of anxiety in Belgian primary care from 2000 to 2021: a registry-based study
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242