Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editor’s Briefing

Sanity and Insanity

Euan Lawson
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (703): 51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp21X714617
Euan Lawson
Acting Editor,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Highlights

In the midst of a pandemic mental health dominates many of our conversations and consultations. Daniela Strelchuk’s qualitative paper offers much to fine tune our antennae to help people at risk of developing psychosis; and research on interventions for depression and anxiety provide welcome hope we can develop non-pharmaceutical options that work in primary care. Two editorials gently lay gauntlets at our feet: prison medicine is not mainstream but is long neglected; and long COVID will feature heavily on clinic lists for months and years. The mobilisation of primary care to tackle the immediate problem of vaccination is astonishing and will be a story for the grandchildren in years to come. Our Deputy Editor, Professor David Misselbrook, offers an ethicist’s slant on vaccination and risk. The editorial from the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) fleshes out the policies and their appreciation of the importance of primary care in this national effort.

On being sane in insane places

In the early 1970s Professor David Rosenhan scruffed himself up and walked into the red-bricked Haverford State Hospital in Pennsylvania with a fictional tale of auditory hallucinations: ‘hollow, empty, thud’. He was admitted for 9 days, his apparent acute paranoid schizophrenia in remission. He went on to write a paper on eight ‘pseudo-patients’ admitted to 12 institutions in the US. The pseudo-patients were all faking it and were ‘sane’ but all were admitted and given various diagnoses around psychosis. The paper On being sane in insane places was published in Science in 1973, has thousands of citations, and has had a profound effect on the direction of psychiatry.1 Curiously, there is only a single mention of his paper in the BJGP archives in a 1979 article by BR Barnett, a consultant psychoanalyst.2

There are two enduring themes in Rosenhan’s work: first, the damning inference was that psychiatry has no reliable method to tell who is truly ill. One might sympathise with that conclusion. The lack of objective markers was keenly felt then; you can draw a line between Rosenhan’s study and the development of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders with its relentless pursuit of formal codifications. And, second, once people are labelled, it impacts on everything we do and how we perceive them. Labels, once applied, are notoriously sticky.

I’m not sure I trust any of the statistics around the proportion of GP time spent on mental health. They often require a process of torturous disaggregation and a pursuit of a mind/body dualism that simply doesn’t chime with clinical practice. A 2013 paper by Chris Salisbury and colleagues presents a far more recognisable picture of general practice — an average of 2.5 problems per 11.9 minute consultation but each problem having potential for multiple ‘issues’ be they psychological/emotional, medication-related, or social.3 People are wonderfully messy, deeply entangled, and rarely easily categorised.

There is a critical 2020 post-script to Rosenhan’s study. Susannah Cahalan experienced labelling when she developed psychosis, was initially tagged as schizophrenic, but was then yanked back from the brink when found to have an autoimmune encephalitis. She was cured and not ‘cordoned off from the rest of medicine’.4 This also leads us to an intriguing question about brain pathology: why are neurology and psychiatry separate, though overlapping, specialities? Cahalan’s book The Great Pretender leads us to the incredible conclusion that Rosenhan’s paper was, in all likelihood, a fabrication. Yet, the processes of labelling and the wrestling with diagnostic codes are as pertinent as ever.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2021

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Rosenhan DL
    (1973) On being sane in insane places. Science 179, 4070, 250–258.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Barnett BR
    (1979) Balint, the doctor, and the fear of being unscientific. J R Coll Gen Pract 29, 206, 520–524, 528–529.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Salisbury C,
    2. Procter S,
    3. Stewart K,
    4. et al.
    (2013) The content of general practice consultations: cross-sectional study based on video recordings. Br J Gen Pract, DOI:https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X674431.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Cahalan S
    (2020) The great pretender. The undercover mission that changed our understanding of madness (Canongate Books, London).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 71 (703)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 71, Issue 703
February 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sanity and Insanity
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Sanity and Insanity
Euan Lawson
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (703): 51. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21X714617

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Sanity and Insanity
Euan Lawson
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (703): 51. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21X714617
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Highlights
    • On being sane in insane places
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Health Inequalities — It’s DÉJÀ-VU All Over again
  • Highlights
Show more Editor’s Briefing

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242