Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editorials

Long COVID and the importance of the doctor–patient relationship

Helen Atherton, Tracy Briggs and Carolyn Chew-Graham
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (703): 54-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp21X714641
Helen Atherton
Primary Care Research, Social Science and Systems in Health, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry.
Roles: Expert by experience; Associate Professor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tracy Briggs
Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester.
Roles: Expert by experience; Senior Lecturer and Honorary Consultant in Genomic Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carolyn Chew-Graham
Manchester; Professor of General Practice Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele.
Roles: GP Principal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

A pandemic was declared in March 2020, due to a novel virus, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). It was initially reported that COVID-19 infection could cause dramatic variation in clinical outcome, from asymptomatic infection through to multi-organ failure and death. Early data reported that 17% of people hospitalised due to COVID-19 would require intensive care, and 32% of these people would die.1,2 Nationally, and internationally, planning focused on identifying and managing the very sick, and reducing people’s exposure to the virus. In primary care, in the UK, there was a move to remote consulting, with the majority of consultations being conducted by telephone or video, and face-to-face consultations being in the minority for the first time in the history of the NHS.3 The prominence of NHS 111 to differentiate between the ‘sick’ and ‘not sick’, and setting up ‘hot hubs’ for assessment of people suspected of having COVID-19 in the community, changed the face of primary care.4

WITNESSING THE EMERGENCE OF A NEW DISEASE

It became clear, however, that the perception that people either die, get admitted to hospital, or recover after 2 weeks was wrong, and that people were continuing to experience persistent symptoms despite apparently mild acute symptoms. Clinicians in primary care, consulting virtually, were hearing narratives from patients who described persistent problems, such as chest pain, palpitations, shortness of breath, fatigue, ‘brain fog’, odd rashes, and loose stools. People with these symptoms, however, were rarely offered a face-to-face appointment with a GP, often spoke to a number of different GPs, and were distressed to find that GPs were as baffled as they were.5 Remote consulting added to the delay in recognition that persistent symptoms were not rare. Some people with ongoing symptoms took to the media (mainstream and social) to describe their problems,6,7 and to raise awareness of persistent symptoms,8 which came to be labelled as ‘long COVID’ by patients themselves.9

Primary care clinicians were initially working in an evidence-free zone, but gradually key primary care researchers published helpful guidance,10 with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence scoping guidance published in October 2020,11 and full guidance in December 2020.12 The latter not using the patient-preferred term ‘long-COVID’, rather using ‘post COVID-19 syndrome’, to describe symptoms persisting after 12 weeks. Some people with persisting symptoms were not happy with this new label.9 A National Institute for Health Research themed review13 emphasised the fluctuating and multi-system symptoms, and suggested that there was a need for ‘one-stop shop’ clinics to offer assessment and investigation for people with long COVID.

FINDING THE ‘RIGHT’ GP

The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) published guidance,14 which included ‘top tips’ for clinicians — the first of which emphasised the need for the patient to be believed, that their symptoms are taken seriously and not dismissed as due to ‘anxiety’, and the importance of finding the ‘right’ GP.5 In addition, a possible pathway for investigation and management was outlined. The RCGP also developed an online learning module, made free to non-members, which emphasised the priority the RCGP gives to this topic, and the RCGP presented evidence to the House of Lords report.15

The NHS released the ‘Your COVID recovery’ website (https://www.yourcovidrecovery.nhs.uk) and announced investment in services for people with persisting symptoms.16 At the time of writing this editorial, we are far from seeing long COVID clinics in every locality. Some people with long COVID, with the financial means to do so, have sought private or complementary therapies.5,17 Such help-seeking may be the result of people feeling desperate and frustrated that the NHS (and GPs in particular) does not seem able to help.5

Management of people with long COVID is the responsibility of general practice. People with persistent symptoms have had to become experts in their symptoms and impact, and GPs may only know as much as their patients can share with them, given the rapidly emerging evidence-base.

IMPORTANCE OF THE DOCTOR–PATIENT RELATIONSHIP

One of the RCGP’s current priorities is ‘relationship-based care’,18 and the patient–doctor relationship is vital in the management of people with long COVID. GPs need to listen to people with persisting symptoms following acute-COVID infection, offer empathy and support, and most importantly, help them to navigate the developing referral pathways — acknowledging that currently this may involve referrals to different specialties. The GP must support the patient, and their families, in ‘putting it all together’.

There have been attempts in the media to link long COVID with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME)19 or post-viral fatigue; however, this linkage has the potential to leave persistent symptoms uninvestigated and may be potentially harmful to patients.17 Certainly long COVID is currently unexplained, but organic pathology must be excluded before a plan for rehabilitation is suggested to the person living with symptoms.20 So the questions remain for GPs: ‘how am I going to differentiate long COVID from other complex symptoms?’, and ‘what resources are available for me to refer patients with long COVID to?’ There is a need to translate the NICE guidance12 into services for people with persistent symptoms. This will require investment in UK-wide community diagnostics, access to therapies, such as physiotherapy, psychology (including Improving Access to Psychological Therapies services21), occupational therapy, and specialist rehabilitation, and organised as an integrated offer for patients. Investment and commitment, however, is also needed by practices to ensure that we can offer continuity of care, recognising the value of the patient–doctor relationship in the delivery of high-quality, safe, care.

Acknowledgments

We wish to acknowledge people with long COVID who participated in interviews in a qualitative study;5 colleagues Kate O’Donnell, David Blane, Tom Kingstone, and Anna Taylor; and the many people with long-COVID who we have spoken with over the past 9 months.

Notes

Provenance

Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Competing interests

The authors have declared no competing interests.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2021

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. UK Government
    (2020) Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the UK (UK Government, London).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Docherty AB,
    2. Harrison EM,
    3. Green CA,
    4. et al.
    (2020) Features of 20 133 UK patients in hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ 369, m1985.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. NHS England and NHS Improvement
    (2020) Advice on how to establish a remote ‘total triage’ model in general practice using online consultations (NHS England and NHS Improvement, London).
  4. 4.↵
    1. Thornton J
    (2020) Covid-19: how coronavirus will change the face of general practice forever. BMJ 368, m1279.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kingstone T,
    2. Taylor AK,
    3. O’Donnell CA,
    4. et al.
    (2020) Finding the ‘right’ GP: a qualitative study of the experiences of people with long-COVID. BJGP Open, DOI:https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen20X101143.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Harding L
    (Jun 7, 2020) ‘It feels endless’: four women struggling to recover from Covid-19. The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/07/it-feels-endless-four-women-struggling-to-recover-from-covid-19-coronavirus-symptoms (accessed 11 Jan 2021).
  7. 7.↵
    1. Campbell J
    (Jun 15, 2020) Fears over thousands of ‘long haul’ Covid-19 sufferers. The Scotsman, https://www.scotsman.com/regions/fears-over-thousands-long-haul-covid-19-sufferers-2884703 (accessed 11 Jan 2021).
  8. 8.↵
    1. Alwan NA,
    2. Attree E,
    3. Blair JM,
    4. et al.
    (2020) From doctors as patients: a manifesto for tackling persisting symptoms of covid-19. BMJ 370, m3565.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Perego E,
    2. Callard F,
    3. Stras L,
    4. et al.
    (2020) Why we need to keep using the patient made term ‘Long COVID’ https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/10/01/why-we-need-to-keep-using-the-patient-made-term-long-covid (accessed 11 Jan 2021).
  10. 10.↵
    1. Greenhalgh T,
    2. Knight M,
    3. A’Court C,
    4. et al.
    (2020) Management of post-acute covid-19 in primary care. BMJ 370, m3026.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
    (2020) Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP). COVID-19 guideline scope: management of the long-term effects of COVID-19 (NICE, London).
  12. 12.↵
    1. NICE
    (2020) COVID-19 rapid guideline: managing the long-term effects of COVID-19. NG188 (NICE, London).
  13. 13.↵
    1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
    (2020) Living with COVID: NIHR publishes dynamic themed review into ‘ongoing COVID’. (NIHR, London).
  14. 14.↵
    1. RCGP
    (2020) Management of the long term effects of COVID-19 (RCGP, London).
  15. 15.↵
    1. RCGP
    (2020) Royal College of General Practitioners — written evidence (COV0051) (UK Government, London).
  16. 16.↵
    1. NHS Digital
    (2020) NHS launches 40 ‘long COVID’ clinics to tackle persistent symptoms (NHS Digital, London).
  17. 17.↵
    1. Perrin R,
    2. Riste L,
    3. Hann M,
    4. et al.
    (2020) Into the looking glass: post-viral syndrome post COVID-19. Med Hypotheses 144, 110055.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. RCGP
    (2020) Policy and campaigning priorities 2020–23 (RCGP, London).
  19. 19.↵
    1. Shepherd C
    (2020) Update: post-covid fatigue, post/long-covid syndromes, and ME/CFS (The ME Association, Gawcott).
  20. 20.↵
    1. Gorna R,
    2. MacDermott N,
    3. Rayner C,
    4. et al.
    (2020) Long COVID guidelines need to reflect lived experience. Lancet doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32705-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    1. NHS Digital
    Adult Improving Access to Psychological Therapies programme (NHS Digital, London).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 71 (703)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 71, Issue 703
February 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Long COVID and the importance of the doctor–patient relationship
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Long COVID and the importance of the doctor–patient relationship
Helen Atherton, Tracy Briggs, Carolyn Chew-Graham
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (703): 54-55. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21X714641

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Long COVID and the importance of the doctor–patient relationship
Helen Atherton, Tracy Briggs, Carolyn Chew-Graham
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (703): 54-55. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21X714641
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • WITNESSING THE EMERGENCE OF A NEW DISEASE
    • FINDING THE ‘RIGHT’ GP
    • IMPORTANCE OF THE DOCTOR–PATIENT RELATIONSHIP
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Primary care and bipolar disorder
  • Determining the role of genetic risk scores in symptomatic cancer detection
  • Antibiotic stewardship: where next?
Show more Editorials

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242