Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

MRCGP Recorded Consultation Assessment — the hidden fourth construct

Chris Williams
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (703): 58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp21X714689
Chris Williams
Rosebery Medical Centre, Loughborough; Senior GP Educator, Tutor Development and Quality, University of Leicester, Leicester. Email:
Roles: GP and Trainer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cdw4@leicester.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The MRCGP Recorded Consultation Assessment (RCA) uses recorded consultations, ostensibly to assess three skills: inter-professional; data gathering, technical and assessment; and decision making and clinical management. These are entirely reasonable constructs for an assessment of readiness for safe independent practice.

However, the RCA has a hidden fourth construct: candidates must select cases that align with the examiners’ view of reasonable level of ‘challenge’. The latest Examiners’ Reports highlight that case selection continues to be a major issue, and some candidates have probably failed for this reason.

This alludes to a problem of construct validity: is the skill of identifying ‘suitable RCA cases’ really a prerequisite for safe, independent general practice? If not, can we justify continuing an assessment that has this hidden fourth construct as a prerequisite skill? Indeed, can ‘level of challenge’ of a GP consultation even be judged reliably? Even the latest candidate guidance appears somewhat vague in its definition. Furthermore, some candidates are likely to have greater difficulty collecting cases to choose from, with part-time trainees, those in smaller practices, and those in areas with large non-English-speaking populations likely to be at a particular disadvantage.

We are now past the early stages of COVID-19 and the ongoing use of the RCA is surely problematic, especially for high-stakes ‘fail’ decisions. Perhaps the RCA should instead be used as a screening test with unsuccessful RCA candidates then sitting the Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA). Smaller numbers of CSA candidates would ensure adequate social distancing. This approach would benefit potentially good candidates with fewer opportunities to record cases or who simply struggle to choose cases that align with the examiners’ particular view of ‘challenge’.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2021
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 71 (703)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 71, Issue 703
February 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MRCGP Recorded Consultation Assessment — the hidden fourth construct
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
MRCGP Recorded Consultation Assessment — the hidden fourth construct
Chris Williams
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (703): 58. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21X714689

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
MRCGP Recorded Consultation Assessment — the hidden fourth construct
Chris Williams
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (703): 58. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21X714689
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying patients at risk of psychosis
  • Social prescribing in ethnic minority communities
  • It wasn’t always rosy …
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242