Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Advertisement
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research

Neuromuscular exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain in older people: a randomised controlled trial in primary care in Hong Kong

Regina Wing Shan Sit, Shirley Yue Kwan Choi, Bo Wang, Dicken Cheong Chun Chan, Dexing Zhang, Benjamin Hon Kei Yip and Samuel Yeung Shan Wong
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (704): e226-e236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X714053
Regina Wing Shan Sit
Division of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Roles: Clinical associate professor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shirley Yue Kwan Choi
Department of Family Medicine, the New Territories East Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, China.
Roles: Associate consultant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bo Wang
Division of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Roles: Research assistant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dicken Cheong Chun Chan
Division of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Roles: Research associate
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dexing Zhang
Division of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Roles: Research assistant professor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin Hon Kei Yip
Division of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Roles: Assistant professor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samuel Yeung Shan Wong
Division of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Roles: Clinical professor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

eLetter submission guidelines

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • A caution on interpreting findings of randomised controlled trials
    Pardis Zalmay
    Published on: 03 March 2021
  • Published on: (3 March 2021)
    A caution on interpreting findings of randomised controlled trials
    • Pardis Zalmay, Senior House Officer (Doctor), Royal Surrey County Hospital

    I read with interest the randomised controlled trial (RCT) by Sit et al proposing neuromuscular (NM) exercise training as a management option in chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain.1

    RCTs have traditionally been hailed as the ‘gold-standard’ for studying treatment effects.2 However, the article in question provides a good example as to why a reader should look beyond the basic study design, into the detail.

    When investigating a new treatment, a useful RCT will compare the proposed intervention with the current gold-standard treatment. In the case of chronic MSK pain it would have been useful to see how NM exercise training compares to another form of exercise training. In reality, the authors have compared their intervention to a ‘waiting list’ control group.

    Not only does this design introduce the ‘nocebo effect’ into the equation as a huge potential confounder, but it also means that the study does little to help guide clinical practice. Although the authors point this out as a limitation of their study towards the end of their paper, the importance of this is vastly understated in my opinion.

    The authors defend their use of a ‘waiting list’ control group by referencing a ‘Personal View’ paper.3 In the current research climate, it is easy to draw on papers that defend various viewpoints - such as the RCT by Cunningham et al that demonstrated that tr...

    Show More

    I read with interest the randomised controlled trial (RCT) by Sit et al proposing neuromuscular (NM) exercise training as a management option in chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain.1

    RCTs have traditionally been hailed as the ‘gold-standard’ for studying treatment effects.2 However, the article in question provides a good example as to why a reader should look beyond the basic study design, into the detail.

    When investigating a new treatment, a useful RCT will compare the proposed intervention with the current gold-standard treatment. In the case of chronic MSK pain it would have been useful to see how NM exercise training compares to another form of exercise training. In reality, the authors have compared their intervention to a ‘waiting list’ control group.

    Not only does this design introduce the ‘nocebo effect’ into the equation as a huge potential confounder, but it also means that the study does little to help guide clinical practice. Although the authors point this out as a limitation of their study towards the end of their paper, the importance of this is vastly understated in my opinion.

    The authors defend their use of a ‘waiting list’ control group by referencing a ‘Personal View’ paper.3 In the current research climate, it is easy to draw on papers that defend various viewpoints - such as the RCT by Cunningham et al that demonstrated that trials with ‘waiting list’ control conditions may significantly overestimate treatment effects.4

    With this in mind, one must take a common-sense approach in interpreting findings from studies such as this.

    References
    1. Sit R, Choi S, Wang B et al. Neuromuscular exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain in older people: a randomised controlled trial in primary care in Hong Kong. Br J Gen Pract 2020;71(704): e226-e236.
    2. Gosall N, Gosall G. The doctor's guide to critical appraisal. Knutsford: PasTest; 2015.
    3. Gold S, Enck P, Hasselmann H et al. Control conditions for randomised trials of behavioural interventions in psychiatry: a decision framework. Lancet Psychiatry 2017; 4(9):725-732.
    4. Cunningham J, Kypri K, McCambridge J. Exploratory randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of a waiting list control design. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013; 13(1).

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 71 (704)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 71, Issue 704
March 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Neuromuscular exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain in older people: a randomised controlled trial in primary care in Hong Kong
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Neuromuscular exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain in older people: a randomised controlled trial in primary care in Hong Kong
Regina Wing Shan Sit, Shirley Yue Kwan Choi, Bo Wang, Dicken Cheong Chun Chan, Dexing Zhang, Benjamin Hon Kei Yip, Samuel Yeung Shan Wong
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (704): e226-e236. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X714053

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Neuromuscular exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain in older people: a randomised controlled trial in primary care in Hong Kong
Regina Wing Shan Sit, Shirley Yue Kwan Choi, Bo Wang, Dicken Cheong Chun Chan, Dexing Zhang, Benjamin Hon Kei Yip, Samuel Yeung Shan Wong
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (704): e226-e236. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X714053
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHOD
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • aged
  • chronic musculoskeletal pain
  • exercise therapy
  • neuromuscular exercise
  • pain
  • randomised controlled trial

More in this TOC Section

  • GPs’ and patients’ views on the value of diagnosing anxiety disorders in primary care: a qualitative interview study
  • The readability of general practice websites: a cross-sectional analysis of all general practice websites in Scotland
  • Antimicrobial stewardship in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based cohort study and interrupted time-series analysis
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242