Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Advertisement
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editor’s Briefing

The Adjacent Possible in Primary Care

Euan Lawson
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (705): 147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp21X715301
Euan Lawson
Editor,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Highlights

Research on respiratory health this month will inform the care of people with pneumonia post-discharge, the ever-challenging timely diagnosis of lung cancer, and the use of antibiotics in COPD. No one wants to miss a cancer diagnosis, much less on the rare occasions when they occur in a child, and an editorial explores this challenging topic. There has been emerging concern about people with learning disabilities and the disproportionate impact of COVID, and Shemtob et al draw our attention back to our primary care systems.

Professor Trish Greenhalgh has been a beacon of evidence-informed commonsense in the pandemic: ferocious academic rigour in lockstep with a GP’s pragmatic wisdom. Throughout the past year this approach to remote consultations has proved invaluable. Alongside Rebecca Rosen, she offers a provocative tilt at the future for remote consultations. Matt ‘remote-by-default’ Hancock would do well to heed them to appreciate the complexities and to understand when clinicians express reservations.

The adjacent possible

A smartphone app that can diagnose pneumonia? Not long ago this would be the stuff of science fiction but in this issue we publish research on a diagnostic accuracy study that can analyse cough sounds. The study by Paul Porter and colleagues reports on how they recorded coughs with an iPhone 6, added in some key questions, and ran it through their algorithm. Your grip may tighten defensively on your stethoscope but pause and consider the diagnostic accuracy of chest auscultation first. Many doctors will fear the unintended consequences of technology and that it is denaturing the ‘care’ in health care. It would take little to irrecoverably damage general practice, which is, as Madeleine Bunting put it, a ‘powerful but fragile construct.’ 1

Recording coughs and running them through a computer is innovative and nudges us into the realms of the ‘adjacent possible’. This phrase was first coined by doctor and biologist Stuart Kauffman but covered in Steven Johnson’s excellent book Where Good Ideas Come From: The Seven Patterns of Innovation, itself a must-read manual for change-seekers.2 The idea of cough analysis by algorithm would have been barely conceivable in the 1980s but it needed the particular confluence of mobile recording technology and computing power to bring it within range. It’s not yet incorporated into the complex system that is human society but it’s close enough that we can grasp the possibilities.

Once innovations creep into the territory of the adjacent possible they are, arguably, inevitable. William F Ogburn and Dorothy Thomas wrote a fascinating essay in 1922 suggesting just that and cited scores of inventions in history that have happened almost simultaneously.3 There are many medical discoveries in this category: the theory of the infection of micro-organisms; the nature of cataracts; and the function of the pancreas were all revealed together. It is easy to be beguiled by technology and while there may be an inevitability to this progress we can remain judicious in how we use them.

We’ve always had ‘technology’ in various guises, and as Stefan Timmermans and Marc Berg put it: ‘Medicine forms an archaeology of layer upon layer of technologies from the most mundane band-aids and pencils to sophisticated machines such as MRIs and artificial hearts ...’ 4

Remote consultations are now with us and, like smartphone apps to listen to coughs, we will have to find ways to accommodate them into our practice.

The adjacent possible in primary care is awaiting us.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2021

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Bunting M
    (2020) Labours of Love: The Crisis of Care (Granta, London).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Johnson S
    (2011) Where Good Ideas Come From: The Seven Patterns of Innovation (Penguin, London).
  3. 3.↵
    1. Ogburn WF,
    2. Thomas D
    (1922) Are inventions inevitable? A note on social evolution. Political Science Quarterly 37, 1, 83–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Timmermans S,
    2. Berg M
    (2003) The practice of medical technology. Sociol Health Illn 25, 3, 97–114.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 71 (705)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 71, Issue 705
April 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Adjacent Possible in Primary Care
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Adjacent Possible in Primary Care
Euan Lawson
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (705): 147. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21X715301

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The Adjacent Possible in Primary Care
Euan Lawson
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (705): 147. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21X715301
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Highlights
    • The adjacent possible
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Health Inequalities — It’s DÉJÀ-VU All Over again
  • Sanity and Insanity
Show more Editor’s Briefing

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242