Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editorials

Suicide prevention and COVID-19: the role of primary care during the pandemic and beyond

Faraz Mughal, Allan House, Nav Kapur, Roger T Webb and Carolyn A Chew-Graham
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (706): 200-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp21X715637
Faraz Mughal
School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele.
Roles: GP and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Doctoral Fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allan House
Division of Psychological and Social Medicine, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds.
Roles: Emeritus Professor of Liaison Psychiatry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nav Kapur
NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre and Centre for Mental Health and Safety, University of Manchester; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester.
Roles: Professor of Psychiatry and Population Health
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roger T Webb
NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre and Centre for Mental Health and Safety, University of Manchester; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester.
Roles: Professor in Mental Health Epidemiology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carolyn A Chew-Graham
School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele.
Roles: GP Partner and Professor of General Practice Research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought with it multiple threats to mental wellbeing — the possibility or reality of serious physical illness; complex COVID-related bereavement; lockdowns that cause isolation and inhibit social contact, or that can increase exposure to abuse in the family; caring for children unable to go to school; and precarious employment and redundancy, failing businesses, and financial insecurity. The pandemic has exacerbated the longstanding pressure on resources and underinvestment in both statutory mental health and wider community services. Against this background we outline the current evidence for impact of COVID-19 on self-harm and suicide rates, and we consider how primary care can contribute to suicide prevention during COVID-19 and after the acute crisis has passed.

IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON MENTAL HEALTH

There is international evidence of raised prevalence of anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and depression symptoms, especially during lockdowns implemented to contain COVID-19, and particularly in young people and those living with children.1,2 Those with pre-existing mental and chronic illness may be at higher risk.3 These increases in prevalence of symptoms of mental illness are important in their own right, and may also increase suicide risk.

SELF-HARM, SUICIDE, AND COVID-19

Self-harm is the strongest risk factor for suicide. Although thoughts of self-harm and suicide are common accompaniments of adversity and poor mental health, evidence to date has not indicated increased rates of self-harm during the UK’s COVID-19 epoch.4 Data from electronic health records in UK general practice identified substantial reductions in recorded incident diagnoses of anxiety disorders, depression, and self-harm episodes during April 2020 compared to previous years.5 Although these rates had returned to expected levels in England by mid-September 2020, we do not yet know the impact of the subsequent stringent regional restrictions and two successive national lockdowns. Marked reductions in help seeking are potentially worrying and warrant close observation. These records-based investigations, however, cannot reveal whether self-harm incidence has fallen commensurately in the community, since the COVID-19 pandemic began.

Suicide is complex and rarely due to a single cause. Evidence about the impact of COVID-19 on suicide rates is emerging. There was a reported rise in thoughts about suicide among young people in the UK during early phases of the pandemic, but such thoughts are common in distress and do not necessarily predict subsequent suicide.6 During the spring and summer months of 2020, suicide rates in the UK and other western countries were found not to have increased;7 however, increased suicide rates were reported in females and young people from July to October 2020 in Japan, and, in the State of Maryland, US, case counts rose among Black residents while falling among White residents from March to May 2020.8,9

For self-harm and suicide, it is possible that the incidence may have risen during the challenging 2020–21 winter months, and risk could rise further in the aftermath of COVID-19, especially as the economic impact of the crisis takes full effect. Thus, ongoing monitoring of these patterns is crucial.

THE ROLE OF PRIMARY CARE

Suicide prevention is considered a multisector public health responsibility, and within this, primary care is a setting where most people (up to 85%) who die by suicide have been seen in general practice the year before, and where high-risk groups such as middle-aged males aged 45–49 years can be identified.10,11 Although suicide is a major public health and primary care challenge, it can be uncommon for some individual practice teams. GPs do, however, consult with many patients who are distressed, who have harmed themselves, and who express suicidal thoughts and intent. Evidence is currently lacking, but it is possible that levels of distress, anxiety, thoughts about suicide, and self-harm in the community will increase through the later stages of the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath, and some GPs have already noticed increases in these presentations.

Assessing risk of suicide by stratifying people into risk categories or assigning risk scores is not a useful way to determine what action to take in primary care because of poor positive predictive values (ranging from 1.3% to 16.7%).12 Particular challenges may arise because of overshadowing with physical symptoms (including ‘long COVID’) and because it is difficult to predict when distress will ameliorate naturally as situations improve, or when difficulties will persist. Nonetheless certain features, alone or in combination, should raise concern for heightened suicide risk and these are highlighted in Box 1. These should aid decision-making and can be readily elicited in a primary care consultation.

  • Sex: suicide is 3 times commoner in males, especially in middle age (45–49 years)

  • History of mental illness, especially with recent inpatient care

  • Chronic physical illness and disability

  • Social adversity: poor social support; social isolation/unconnectedness; loneliness; recent bereavement; or unemployment

  • Perceived burdensomeness

  • Low self-worth

  • Hopelessness

  • History of, or current, self-harm and/or alcohol/substance misuse

  • Active plans for suicide and access to means

Box 1.

Concerning clinical features in primary care

COVID-19 has rapidly changed the primary care context, such as the implementation of remote consultations to reduce COVID-19 contagion, but principles of good care remain. Therefore, an important element of suicide prevention in primary care should be to improve mental health care for all patients. The response to identified heightened suicide risk in primary care should include the following components:13

  • supported self-management, including a discussion about staying safe during difficult times and signposting to self-care resources (for example, online and third-sector support);

  • follow-up with active surveillance for deterioration; and

  • referral to specialist mental health services.

Members of the primary care team other than GPs, including practice nurses, clinical pharmacists, physiotherapists, dentists, and physician associates, have an important part to play in identifying and intervening for patients with suicidal thoughts and self-harm, which may facilitate early help seeking during the COVID-19 crisis.

For primary care to become an effective part of the multi-agency approach to suicide prevention during the pandemic and beyond, there has to be effective collaborative working with other sectors such as the education and social care systems, and uniformity in approaches. Facilitators and future priorities to enable primary care to lead the way in suicide prevention during COVID-19 are identified below.

FACILITATORS

Improved communication between mental health services, including liaison psychiatric and community services, and primary care teams can facilitate enhanced management for people who have harmed themselves.13 Tailored services for primary care teams to signpost patients who have suicidal thoughts or have harmed themselves are needed to facilitate effective care for people in distress.13

Third-sector organisations can play a supporting role in providing psychological therapy for patients who have harmed themselves or expressed suicidal thoughts, especially given the lack of bespoke provision of care for these patients through the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies programme.14

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

The planned integrated community and primary care mental health services for self-harm, as outlined in the NHS Long Term Plan (www.longtermplan.nhs.uk), may help to facilitate rapid intervention and treatment, although continued financial investment is needed to sustain such services. It is crucial that these services communicate effectively with primary care teams, are available for GPs to refer to, and include young people.

During 2021, primary care networks have the potential to invest in mental health professionals working in general practice. This may improve care and therapeutic relationships for patients at heightened suicide risk. Remote consultations provide a challenge for clinicians as rapport may be detrimentally affected; an evidence base for best practice in remote mental health and self-harm assessments has not yet been established. There is a pressing need for research to develop and test primary care delivered interventions to reduce self-harm and suicide risk in all patients, in partnership with patients and the public, to mitigate suicide risk during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

Notes

Provenance

Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Competing interests

Faraz Mughal is funded by a NIHR doctoral fellowship (reference: NIHR300957). Carolyn A Chew-Graham is part-funded by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West Midlands; Nav Kapur and Roger T Webb are part-funded by the NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre. Nav Kapur chaired the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for self-harm (longer-term management) 2012 and the NICE Quality Standards on self-harm 2013; and is the topic adviser for the new NICE guideline for self-harm. Faraz Mughal is a member of the new NICE guideline committee for self-harm. Nav Kapur works with NHS England on national quality improvement initiatives for suicide and self-harm and sits on the Department of Health and Social Care’s National Suicide Prevention Strategy Advisory Group for England. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not those of the NHS, NIHR, NICE, or the Department of Health and Social Care.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2021

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Xiong J,
    2. Lipsitz O,
    3. Nasri F,
    4. et al.
    (2020) Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: a systematic review. J Affect Disord 277, 55–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Pierce M,
    2. Hope H,
    3. Ford T,
    4. et al.
    (2020) Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population. Lancet Psychiatry 7, 10, 883–892.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Wong SYS,
    2. Zhang D,
    3. Sit RWS,
    4. et al.
    (2020) Impact of COVID-19 on loneliness, mental health, and health service utilisation: a prospective cohort study of older adults with multimorbidity in primary care. Br J Gen Pract, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X713021.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Kapur N,
    2. Clements C,
    3. Appleby L,
    4. et al.
    (2021) Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm. Lancet Psychiatry 8, 2, e4.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Carr MJ,
    2. Steeg S,
    3. Webb RT,
    4. et al.
    (2021) Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary care-recorded mental illness and self-harm episodes in the UK: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Public Health 6, 2, e124–e135.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. O’Connor RC,
    2. Wetherall K,
    3. Cleare S,
    4. et al.
    (2020) Mental health and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: longitudinal analyses of adults in the UK COVID-19 Mental Health & Wellbeing study. Br J Psychiatry doi:10.1192/bjp.2020.212.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Appleby L
    (2021) What has been the effect of covid-19 on suicide rates? BMJ 372, n834.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Tanaka T,
    2. Okamoto S
    (2021) Increase in suicide following an initial decline during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. Nat Hum Behav 5, 2, 229–238.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Bray MJC,
    2. Daneshvari NO,
    3. Radhakrishnan I,
    4. et al.
    (2021) Racial differences in statewide suicide mortality trends in Maryland during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. JAMA Psychiatry 78, 4, 444–447.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. John A,
    2. DelPozo-Banos M,
    3. Gunnell D,
    4. et al.
    (2020) Contacts with primary and secondary healthcare prior to suicide: case-control whole-population-based study using person-level linked routine data in Wales, UK, 2000–2017. Br J Psychiatry 217, 6, 717–724.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. HM Government
    (2021) Preventing suicide in England: fifth progress report of the cross-government outcomes strategy to save lives (HM Government, London).
  12. 12.↵
    1. Chan MKY,
    2. Bhatti H,
    3. Meader N,
    4. et al.
    (2016) Predicting suicide following self-harm: systematic review of risk factors and risk scales. Br J Psychiatry 209, 4, 277–283.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Mughal F,
    2. Troya MI,
    3. Dikomitis L,
    4. et al.
    (2020) Role of the GP in the management of patients with self-harm behaviour: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X708257.
  14. 14.↵
    1. House of Commons Health Committee
    (2017) Suicide prevention: sixth report of session 2016–17 (UK Parliament, London).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 71 (706)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 71, Issue 706
May 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Suicide prevention and COVID-19: the role of primary care during the pandemic and beyond
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Suicide prevention and COVID-19: the role of primary care during the pandemic and beyond
Faraz Mughal, Allan House, Nav Kapur, Roger T Webb, Carolyn A Chew-Graham
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (706): 200-201. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21X715637

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Suicide prevention and COVID-19: the role of primary care during the pandemic and beyond
Faraz Mughal, Allan House, Nav Kapur, Roger T Webb, Carolyn A Chew-Graham
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (706): 200-201. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21X715637
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON MENTAL HEALTH
    • SELF-HARM, SUICIDE, AND COVID-19
    • THE ROLE OF PRIMARY CARE
    • FACILITATORS
    • FUTURE DIRECTIONS
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Antibiotic stewardship: where next?
  • What needs to be done to address staffing shortages in health and social care?
  • Primary care and bipolar disorder
Show more Editorials

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242