Jump to comment:
- Page navigation anchor for Beyond relational continuityBeyond relational continuity
I read with interest the proposed mechanisms that link relational continuity to outcomes. The discussion is comprehensive and the proposed theories plausible. It is important to note though, that most trial evidence supporting continuity and outcomes examines longitudinal, rather than relational continuity. These two forms of continuity are obviously related and often conflated, but they are different. Despite this, and the lack of trial evidence supporting causation, relational continuity for patients is primary care, is almost certainly a "good thing” which should be maximised wherever possible. However, the current constraints of primary care also make relational continuity difficult to deliver for many practices. We also know that not all patients desire relational continuity or, at times, prioritise timely convenient access over continuity. Whilst policies that attempt to increase relational continuity of care should be advocated for, we need to accept many patients in do not receive relational continuity. It is interesting that the RCGP has chosen to promote Relationship Based Care rather than directly advocating for relational continuity.
Patients who may not want, or be able to see the same clinician, want continuity in its other forms. Continuity encompasses more than seeing the same clinician. Models of continuity such as Haggerty’s describe several aspects of continuity, including clinicians having accesses to appropriate informati...
Competing Interests: None declared.